<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EEVblog - The Electronics Engineering Video Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eevblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eevblog.com</link>
	<description>No Script, No Fear, All Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74715</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74715</guid>
		<description>Dave, a blog of you making a blog is not a bad idea. Kind of a &quot;day in the life&quot; so we can see how much work is involved. Sounds like it is a fair bit of work, not to mention the electronics.

...mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, a blog of you making a blog is not a bad idea. Kind of a &#8220;day in the life&#8221; so we can see how much work is involved. Sounds like it is a fair bit of work, not to mention the electronics.</p>
<p>&#8230;mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74712</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74712</guid>
		<description>Lintek are indeed high end, but their pricing for regular PCBs is very competitive for a local manufacturer. When I started using Lintek a few years ago I got quotes from all the manufacturers who were left in Australia (back then it was Entech, Lintek, IMP, BEC, Precision Circuits, Artronic), and Lintek was the cheapest for a double layer board.

Try getting a quote from Lintek on your uCurrent boards to see how they compare to the NZ manufacturer.

IMP still do local manufacturing, but they can also source PCBs from China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lintek are indeed high end, but their pricing for regular PCBs is very competitive for a local manufacturer. When I started using Lintek a few years ago I got quotes from all the manufacturers who were left in Australia (back then it was Entech, Lintek, IMP, BEC, Precision Circuits, Artronic), and Lintek was the cheapest for a double layer board.</p>
<p>Try getting a quote from Lintek on your uCurrent boards to see how they compare to the NZ manufacturer.</p>
<p>IMP still do local manufacturing, but they can also source PCBs from China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74709</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74709</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By the way, there are still at least 3 PCB Manufacturers who locally produce boards in Australia: Lintek, IMP and Artronic Productions. &lt;/blockquote&gt;


I had forgotten about Artronics, and aren&#039;t Lintek very high-end and uncompetitive for regular boards?
And I was under the impression that IMP off-shored now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By the way, there are still at least 3 PCB Manufacturers who locally produce boards in Australia: Lintek, IMP and Artronic Productions. </p></blockquote>
<p>I had forgotten about Artronics, and aren&#8217;t Lintek very high-end and uncompetitive for regular boards?<br />
And I was under the impression that IMP off-shored now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Keith Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74708</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74708</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t even type my own name! Nor the word &quot;same&quot;! As Dave would say...FAIL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t even type my own name! Nor the word &#8220;same&#8221;! As Dave would say&#8230;FAIL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Keithy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74707</link>
		<dc:creator>Keithy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74707</guid>
		<description>I have the smae unit and the same problem: don&#039;t know how many times I&#039;ve come into my lab in the morning and noticed a quick red flash! I think, though, in my situation, that as well as needing a LED on all the time it needs to be above the huge knob: I find that the knob hides the LED a lot of the time even when  it is on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the smae unit and the same problem: don&#8217;t know how many times I&#8217;ve come into my lab in the morning and noticed a quick red flash! I think, though, in my situation, that as well as needing a LED on all the time it needs to be above the huge knob: I find that the knob hides the LED a lot of the time even when  it is on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Don</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-74706</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-74706</guid>
		<description>This may be ignorance, but does the FE-5680A need to be sent to a calibration lab to be tracable?  Or is it locked on frequency of the physics of the thing?  Maybe just to verify the &quot;locked&quot; signal actually means the thing is locked and you&#039;re not just seeing the OCXO output?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be ignorance, but does the FE-5680A need to be sent to a calibration lab to be tracable?  Or is it locked on frequency of the physics of the thing?  Maybe just to verify the &#8220;locked&#8221; signal actually means the thing is locked and you&#8217;re not just seeing the OCXO output?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Mikuslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikuslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74705</guid>
		<description>Great to see that there are some local pcb fabs with good quality. Hard come by these. On the other hand the old ucurrent looks a bit better (at least on camera) - the red mask is a bit more suitable for the panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see that there are some local pcb fabs with good quality. Hard come by these. On the other hand the old ucurrent looks a bit better (at least on camera) &#8211; the red mask is a bit more suitable for the panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Al Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74697</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74697</guid>
		<description>BEAUTY! LOVE IT! WINNA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEAUTY! LOVE IT! WINNA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74694</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74694</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave, solid work as always! I just wanted to point out that iTead studios also offer a faster DHL shipping alternative, with which I received my boards after a week to Sweden.
Love your blog, keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, solid work as always! I just wanted to point out that iTead studios also offer a faster DHL shipping alternative, with which I received my boards after a week to Sweden.<br />
Love your blog, keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by ZPapaGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74693</link>
		<dc:creator>ZPapaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74693</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,
I had a similar issue on one of my art projects. Being the starving artist, I REALLY KISS&#039;ed a solution.  I mounted a 3mm LED between the legs of a 5mm LED.  With a little higher current, the small one shines quite nicely trough the large one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,<br />
I had a similar issue on one of my art projects. Being the starving artist, I REALLY KISS&#8217;ed a solution.  I mounted a 3mm LED between the legs of a 5mm LED.  With a little higher current, the small one shines quite nicely trough the large one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #186 &#8211; Soldering Tutorial Part 3 &#8211; Surface Mount by Electronics-Lab.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Surface mount soldering tutorial</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/07/18/eevblog-186-soldering-tutorial-part-3-surface-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-74692</link>
		<dc:creator>Electronics-Lab.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Surface mount soldering tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1602#comment-74692</guid>
		<description>[...] made a SMD hand soldering tutorial. In the video Dave explains how to solder small SMD capacitors and resistors, all the standard size [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made a SMD hand soldering tutorial. In the video Dave explains how to solder small SMD capacitors and resistors, all the standard size [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74687</guid>
		<description>The Component Overlay would most likely be applied in exactly the same way as the soldermask, using a Liquid, photo imageable ink (LPI). It&#039;s typically a more expensive process then regular silkscreening but the results are far far superior. 

By the way, there are still at least 3 PCB Manufacturers who locally produce boards in Australia: Lintek, IMP and Artronic Productions. I have been using Lintek for over 5 years and their quality is absolutely superb (and they also use the LPI Component Overlays). Lintek make their boards in a completely different way to other manufactures through a process of electrodepositing the copper to the board rather than etching it. This results is very precise track geometries. (http://www.lintek.com.au/unrivalled.html)

There is another prototype service I have recently used called Dorkbot PDX (http://dorkbotpdx.org/wiki/pcb_order), where you pay a flat rate of USD 5 per square inch (you get three copies of each board for this price), with a USD 15 postage fee. The boards are manufactured in the USA, and the quality is also very good (except for the component overlay which uses a silkscreen process). However it can take 3 to 4 weeks to receive the Dorkbot boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Component Overlay would most likely be applied in exactly the same way as the soldermask, using a Liquid, photo imageable ink (LPI). It&#8217;s typically a more expensive process then regular silkscreening but the results are far far superior. </p>
<p>By the way, there are still at least 3 PCB Manufacturers who locally produce boards in Australia: Lintek, IMP and Artronic Productions. I have been using Lintek for over 5 years and their quality is absolutely superb (and they also use the LPI Component Overlays). Lintek make their boards in a completely different way to other manufactures through a process of electrodepositing the copper to the board rather than etching it. This results is very precise track geometries. (<a href="http://www.lintek.com.au/unrivalled.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lintek.com.au/unrivalled.html</a>)</p>
<p>There is another prototype service I have recently used called Dorkbot PDX (<a href="http://dorkbotpdx.org/wiki/pcb_order" rel="nofollow">http://dorkbotpdx.org/wiki/pcb_order</a>), where you pay a flat rate of USD 5 per square inch (you get three copies of each board for this price), with a USD 15 postage fee. The boards are manufactured in the USA, and the quality is also very good (except for the component overlay which uses a silkscreen process). However it can take 3 to 4 weeks to receive the Dorkbot boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74686</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74686</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Murphy was an optimist…”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve seen that on a T-shirt somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Murphy was an optimist…”</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that on a T-shirt somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74685</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74685</guid>
		<description>I screw up a fair bit, my brain and mouth lose sync often, but mostly I just edit to cut the dead space at start and end of each clip. On a good day every clip will make the cut. I never rehearse. Where are your videos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I screw up a fair bit, my brain and mouth lose sync often, but mostly I just edit to cut the dead space at start and end of each clip. On a good day every clip will make the cut. I never rehearse. Where are your videos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74684</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74684</guid>
		<description>Great video. Amazing that they didn&#039;t have it working this way already. My Duratech iron from Jaycar has this type of led system. But if you think it will stop you forgetting to turn it off ... well, at least for me it&#039;s a while sometimes before I notice. Lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video. Amazing that they didn&#8217;t have it working this way already. My Duratech iron from Jaycar has this type of led system. But if you think it will stop you forgetting to turn it off &#8230; well, at least for me it&#8217;s a while sometimes before I notice. Lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74683</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74683</guid>
		<description>Yep, that&#039;s my new video editor NCH VideoPad. Can&#039;t read the odd camera file correctly it seems. Annoying, but with sticking with as I like it better than Sony Vegas or VideoStudio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s my new video editor NCH VideoPad. Can&#8217;t read the odd camera file correctly it seems. Annoying, but with sticking with as I like it better than Sony Vegas or VideoStudio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Tony P</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74682</guid>
		<description>I love my MPJA ZD-929C. It&#039;s got all the features and you can tell that it&#039;s powered on without modification. Plus it&#039;s less expensive than the Hakko too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my MPJA ZD-929C. It&#8217;s got all the features and you can tell that it&#8217;s powered on without modification. Plus it&#8217;s less expensive than the Hakko too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Wilfred</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74676</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74676</guid>
		<description>At around 10:13 there is a breakup of the video. Seems to be at an edit point. It is only momentary but I&#039;ve noticed it once or twice before, recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At around 10:13 there is a breakup of the video. Seems to be at an edit point. It is only momentary but I&#8217;ve noticed it once or twice before, recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Wartex</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74674</link>
		<dc:creator>Wartex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74674</guid>
		<description>Do you screw up explaining something and shoot it again, or it&#039;s just straight cutting (i.e. no retakes)? I try to make my vids in one shot by rehearsing the whole thing several times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you screw up explaining something and shoot it again, or it&#8217;s just straight cutting (i.e. no retakes)? I try to make my vids in one shot by rehearsing the whole thing several times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by David Bogot</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74673</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bogot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74673</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I love the EEVBlog - I&#039;ve probably learned more about electrical/electronics engineering from you in the last few months than I did while getting my electrical engineering degree!

In this video, you mention Murphy yet again.  I thought I would share MY favorite - &quot;O&#039;Malley&#039;s Law&quot;.

O&#039;Malley&#039;s law states: &quot;Murphy was an optimist...&quot;

Keep up the good work, and best of luck to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I love the EEVBlog &#8211; I&#8217;ve probably learned more about electrical/electronics engineering from you in the last few months than I did while getting my electrical engineering degree!</p>
<p>In this video, you mention Murphy yet again.  I thought I would share MY favorite &#8211; &#8220;O&#8217;Malley&#8217;s Law&#8221;.</p>
<p>O&#8217;Malley&#8217;s law states: &#8220;Murphy was an optimist&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, and best of luck to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74669</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74669</guid>
		<description>Yep, it&#039;s not a silk screening process. Circuit Labs clued me in on what it is, but asked me not to tell! :-P
And extremely durable too they claim, as well as superior alignment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it&#8217;s not a silk screening process. Circuit Labs clued me in on what it is, but asked me not to tell! <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And extremely durable too they claim, as well as superior alignment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74667</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74667</guid>
		<description>Yep, very likely just tool size availability/rounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, very likely just tool size availability/rounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-74666</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-74666</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. My videos cost time and money, at both ends of the stick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. My videos cost time and money, at both ends of the stick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74665</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74665</guid>
		<description>The PWM is likely just a consequence of the LED output being directly connected to the heater switching circuitry. So it&#039;s not really &quot;PWM&quot; as such.
A video like that would take maybe a few hours to shoot (I had over an hour of recorded footage, but sometimes I forget to press stop :-&gt;), editing takes maybe an hour or two. Several hours to render and upload (but that&#039;s mostly hands-off). So not uncommon for such a video to take most of a day to do. A more complex video like a big review might take several days total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PWM is likely just a consequence of the LED output being directly connected to the heater switching circuitry. So it&#8217;s not really &#8220;PWM&#8221; as such.<br />
A video like that would take maybe a few hours to shoot (I had over an hour of recorded footage, but sometimes I forget to press stop :->), editing takes maybe an hour or two. Several hours to render and upload (but that&#8217;s mostly hands-off). So not uncommon for such a video to take most of a day to do. A more complex video like a big review might take several days total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Variable power supply</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74662</link>
		<dc:creator>Variable power supply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74662</guid>
		<description>[...] what a tiny heatsink he has.  I wouldn&#039;t try to get 1.5A out of that at a low voltage...  Check out this for an open source PSU design. This will be available in kit form almost certainly. Check out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what a tiny heatsink he has.  I wouldn&#039;t try to get 1.5A out of that at a low voltage&#8230;  Check out this for an open source PSU design. This will be available in kit form almost certainly. Check out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #242 &#8211; Hakko FX-888 Soldering Iron Hack by Manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/03/eevblog-242-hakko-fx-888-soldering-iron-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-74661</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1894#comment-74661</guid>
		<description>Hi!

As nearly everytime, again a very nice video, btw. how long does it usually take to produce  such a video of 26mins? 

What would you guess why are they doing PWM on the original led?

Regards from Germany,
  Manuel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>As nearly everytime, again a very nice video, btw. how long does it usually take to produce  such a video of 26mins? </p>
<p>What would you guess why are they doing PWM on the original led?</p>
<p>Regards from Germany,<br />
  Manuel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Kenneth Finnegan, W6KWF</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-74658</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Finnegan, W6KWF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-74658</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing some digging and poking around on my FE-5680A I just got in the mail.  (Your stupid video cost me $50!)

It is in fact serial programmable, but only 300Hz agile in each direction (with 32 bit resolution, none-the-less), so not useful for much more than calibration against a GPS locked source.

The unpopulated switch-mode section is for one of the options that allows for the device to be powered from a single 20-35V supply instead of 5V,15V.

The thing on top of the crystal looks to me like a PTC heater.  These are barium titanate heaters that can be doped to severely lose conductivity at a specific temperature, so they&#039;re essentially self-regulating heaters.  They&#039;re often used for QRSS oscillators as well, since it is a very easy way to oven-regulate a crystal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing some digging and poking around on my FE-5680A I just got in the mail.  (Your stupid video cost me $50!)</p>
<p>It is in fact serial programmable, but only 300Hz agile in each direction (with 32 bit resolution, none-the-less), so not useful for much more than calibration against a GPS locked source.</p>
<p>The unpopulated switch-mode section is for one of the options that allows for the device to be powered from a single 20-35V supply instead of 5V,15V.</p>
<p>The thing on top of the crystal looks to me like a PTC heater.  These are barium titanate heaters that can be doped to severely lose conductivity at a specific temperature, so they&#8217;re essentially self-regulating heaters.  They&#8217;re often used for QRSS oscillators as well, since it is a very easy way to oven-regulate a crystal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by DJ Delorie</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74646</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Delorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74646</guid>
		<description>I find that my flatbed scanner is the best way to get high-res images of circuit boards.  Also, since you know the scan resolution, you can measure features as well.

Also, note that holes in HASL treated boards may be smaller diameter as the HASL plates the inside of the holes as well.  Manufacturers are supposed to account for that, though, but they might always use the bigger drill so they don&#039;t have to have option-specific drill adjustments.  Also, some manufacturers have a limited set of drills and will round up, so the fact that one board&#039;s holes were bigger than the other might have been a coincidence of available tool sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that my flatbed scanner is the best way to get high-res images of circuit boards.  Also, since you know the scan resolution, you can measure features as well.</p>
<p>Also, note that holes in HASL treated boards may be smaller diameter as the HASL plates the inside of the holes as well.  Manufacturers are supposed to account for that, though, but they might always use the bigger drill so they don&#8217;t have to have option-specific drill adjustments.  Also, some manufacturers have a limited set of drills and will round up, so the fact that one board&#8217;s holes were bigger than the other might have been a coincidence of available tool sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Daygen</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74633</link>
		<dc:creator>Daygen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74633</guid>
		<description>Hiya Dave, great to see some NZ stuff, I live in NZ and didn&#039;t know about Circuit Labs.. got all of our boards made in China, definitely check them out for the next run.

Can&#039;t wait for the power supply kit, looks awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Dave, great to see some NZ stuff, I live in NZ and didn&#8217;t know about Circuit Labs.. got all of our boards made in China, definitely check them out for the next run.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for the power supply kit, looks awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #241 &#8211; Circuit Labs PCBs from New Zealand by Asm</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/02/02/eevblog-241-circuit-labs-pcbs-from-new-zealand/comment-page-1/#comment-74632</link>
		<dc:creator>Asm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1892#comment-74632</guid>
		<description>The Circuit Labs silkscreen might be a photosensitive one - applied the same way soldermask is. Was looking for soldermask on eBay a few months ago, and came upon some jars specifically for labelling use. 

It would also explain both the more transparent nature as well as the perfectly smooth edges - this is not an old-fashioned silkscreen process, at the very least. The dot-matrix effect you see on the chinese boards is due to the mesh used to create the screen for the printing.


Nice boards, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Circuit Labs silkscreen might be a photosensitive one &#8211; applied the same way soldermask is. Was looking for soldermask on eBay a few months ago, and came upon some jars specifically for labelling use. </p>
<p>It would also explain both the more transparent nature as well as the perfectly smooth edges &#8211; this is not an old-fashioned silkscreen process, at the very least. The dot-matrix effect you see on the chinese boards is due to the mesh used to create the screen for the printing.</p>
<p>Nice boards, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by Lidi</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74627</guid>
		<description>I am waitnig for this part, when you realize, this is not a really precision device. :)
My Microchip DAC cant go to 0V, I have to pull down the outputs. I use them with trimmers at the outpus, so I can set the max value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waitnig for this part, when you realize, this is not a really precision device. <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My Microchip DAC cant go to 0V, I have to pull down the outputs. I use them with trimmers at the outpus, so I can set the max value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #1 &#8211; Rigol DS1052E Oscilloscope Reviwed by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2009/04/05/eevblog-1-rigol-ds1052e-oscilloscope-reviwed/comment-page-1/#comment-74616</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/?p=3#comment-74616</guid>
		<description>Most likely. I&#039;ve debugged I2C on a TDS210 with 2.5K memory, but it sucks as you can not see much of the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely. I&#8217;ve debugged I2C on a TDS210 with 2.5K memory, but it sucks as you can not see much of the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by DJ Delorie</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74601</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Delorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74601</guid>
		<description>Since you&#039;re only using 10 of the 12 DAC bits anyway, you could multiply by two in software instead of using the 2x gain, and cut your error in half.  Just move one of those two &quot;shift out zero&quot; calls to the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re only using 10 of the 12 DAC bits anyway, you could multiply by two in software instead of using the 2x gain, and cut your error in half.  Just move one of those two &#8220;shift out zero&#8221; calls to the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74600</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74600</guid>
		<description>How about sharing your code with us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about sharing your code with us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wireless Power Transfer &amp; Transformer Tutorial by ps3 ylod</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/01/04/wireless-power-transfer-transformer-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-74599</link>
		<dc:creator>ps3 ylod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1275#comment-74599</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really a cool and useful piece of info. I am happy that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really a cool and useful piece of info. I am happy that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by hpux735</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74598</link>
		<dc:creator>hpux735</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74598</guid>
		<description>Also agreed.

It could be that the LCD can&#039;t shunt enough current through the SDA pin to bring it all the way to 0v.  Maybe you could try a weaker pullup resistor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also agreed.</p>
<p>It could be that the LCD can&#8217;t shunt enough current through the SDA pin to bring it all the way to 0v.  Maybe you could try a weaker pullup resistor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74590</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74590</guid>
		<description>Agreed, definitely the ACK signal from the slave device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, definitely the ACK signal from the slave device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by sdscotto</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74572</link>
		<dc:creator>sdscotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74572</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had issues with Newhaven products, too.  It is almost always some timing related issue, and their data sheets are often wrong wrt timing.

Check out their forums as their userbase are always coming up with fixes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had issues with Newhaven products, too.  It is almost always some timing related issue, and their data sheets are often wrong wrt timing.</p>
<p>Check out their forums as their userbase are always coming up with fixes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by Rafa</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74571</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74571</guid>
		<description>It looks that what you see in the scope is ACKs of I2C bus.
During ACK the line must be released by the master (HIGH,pullups) and the slave must pull down the SDA line during the acknowledge clock pulse. So something is happening with the slave and how it putlls down SDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks that what you see in the scope is ACKs of I2C bus.<br />
During ACK the line must be released by the master (HIGH,pullups) and the slave must pull down the SDA line during the acknowledge clock pulse. So something is happening with the slave and how it putlls down SDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by Janek</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74570</link>
		<dc:creator>Janek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74570</guid>
		<description>The way I understand that datasheet, the accuracy is given in units of LSB for each of the part options, so one LSB of the 10-bit part = 4 LSB of the 12-bit part, so the 12-bit part should still have (slightly) higher accuracy, or am I missing something? Sounds like they just bin them at the factory based on which spec they fulfill...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I understand that datasheet, the accuracy is given in units of LSB for each of the part options, so one LSB of the 10-bit part = 4 LSB of the 12-bit part, so the 12-bit part should still have (slightly) higher accuracy, or am I missing something? Sounds like they just bin them at the factory based on which spec they fulfill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #240 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 8 by H.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/31/eevblog-240-power-supply-design-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-74569</link>
		<dc:creator>H.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1890#comment-74569</guid>
		<description>While debugging the Software you missed one SPI_CLK at 12:57</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While debugging the Software you missed one SPI_CLK at 12:57</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74551</link>
		<dc:creator>schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74551</guid>
		<description>Should have read the design documents...

It is stated that actually a reverse mounded LED is already used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have read the design documents&#8230;</p>
<p>It is stated that actually a reverse mounded LED is already used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74540</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74540</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Great on moving production to a more professional way. I believe that the real benefit of this effort is to make the product available to more people and not just to bring the price down.

My recently bought uCurrent is still on it&#039;s way so I can only judge the performance of the product based on reviews, but I think that the current price is more than ok.

On the other hand I would had re-named the revision as the PCB design was actually modified. Maybe use different revision numbers, on for the electrical design, one for the PCB and maybe one for the case / mechanical design.

Regards Charlie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Great on moving production to a more professional way. I believe that the real benefit of this effort is to make the product available to more people and not just to bring the price down.</p>
<p>My recently bought uCurrent is still on it&#8217;s way so I can only judge the performance of the product based on reviews, but I think that the current price is more than ok.</p>
<p>On the other hand I would had re-named the revision as the PCB design was actually modified. Maybe use different revision numbers, on for the electrical design, one for the PCB and maybe one for the case / mechanical design.</p>
<p>Regards Charlie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74518</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74518</guid>
		<description>Hehe :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #1 &#8211; Rigol DS1052E Oscilloscope Reviwed by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2009/04/05/eevblog-1-rigol-ds1052e-oscilloscope-reviwed/comment-page-1/#comment-74512</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/?p=3#comment-74512</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
Re sample memory and Rigol versus TDS210
I have a Tek TDS1002 50mhz can&#039;t find spec on sample memory except it says 2500 records.

I want to work with i2c.
Will I need to upgrade?
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
Re sample memory and Rigol versus TDS210<br />
I have a Tek TDS1002 50mhz can&#8217;t find spec on sample memory except it says 2500 records.</p>
<p>I want to work with i2c.<br />
Will I need to upgrade?<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Apothus</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74510</link>
		<dc:creator>Apothus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74510</guid>
		<description>I have been realy enjoying this series and looking forward to a kit release!

I like the whole design process and i think it is great to hear some of the other considerations, such as case size etc. 

However to some extent i mirror DCflux&#039;s comment about the higher voltage ability. Having said that though im looking forward to putting some theory into practice and looking at extending that capability myself, you can never have enough supplies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been realy enjoying this series and looking forward to a kit release!</p>
<p>I like the whole design process and i think it is great to hear some of the other considerations, such as case size etc. </p>
<p>However to some extent i mirror DCflux&#8217;s comment about the higher voltage ability. Having said that though im looking forward to putting some theory into practice and looking at extending that capability myself, you can never have enough supplies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #180 &#8211; Soldering Tutorial Part 1 &#8211; Tools by Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/06/19/eevblog-180-soldering-tutorial-part-1-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-74506</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1544#comment-74506</guid>
		<description>terrorble iron one of the worst ive used</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terrorble iron one of the worst ive used</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74483</link>
		<dc:creator>schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74483</guid>
		<description>Hi,

did you also consider to use a reverse mounted battery indicator LED? (something like Digi-Key 160-1456-2-ND)

Maybe you also need to change the hole size and the pads of the LED.

I assume that your assembler is currently using normal LEDs and flips them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>did you also consider to use a reverse mounted battery indicator LED? (something like Digi-Key 160-1456-2-ND)</p>
<p>Maybe you also need to change the hole size and the pads of the LED.</p>
<p>I assume that your assembler is currently using normal LEDs and flips them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #7 &#8211; Engineering job interview tips galore! by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2009/05/05/eevblog-7-engineering-job-interview-tips-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-74476</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/?p=60#comment-74476</guid>
		<description>Good video,

I would like to add my advice:

Write or email thank you notes!  Personalize the note by bringing up something that you went over in the interview.  Very few people send thank you notes so it will help you standout.

Be careful not to talk to much.  Yes you have to sell yourself every chance you can but try to zero in what they are looking for.  Take the time to fully understand what the position requires and work towards convincing them that you are the best fit.  Don&#039;t be afraid to let a moment of silence pass.

Be aware that a large part of what the interviewer is looking for is, how will this person fit into my existing group.  Try to bring up how you have worked in teams and what role you had.

Use a good firm hand shake with a look in the eyes.

If presented a business card take the time to look it over and be appreciative that you have been handed it.

Just some of what I have learned over the years...Good luck new EE&#039;s.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good video,</p>
<p>I would like to add my advice:</p>
<p>Write or email thank you notes!  Personalize the note by bringing up something that you went over in the interview.  Very few people send thank you notes so it will help you standout.</p>
<p>Be careful not to talk to much.  Yes you have to sell yourself every chance you can but try to zero in what they are looking for.  Take the time to fully understand what the position requires and work towards convincing them that you are the best fit.  Don&#8217;t be afraid to let a moment of silence pass.</p>
<p>Be aware that a large part of what the interviewer is looking for is, how will this person fit into my existing group.  Try to bring up how you have worked in teams and what role you had.</p>
<p>Use a good firm hand shake with a look in the eyes.</p>
<p>If presented a business card take the time to look it over and be appreciative that you have been handed it.</p>
<p>Just some of what I have learned over the years&#8230;Good luck new EE&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by Worf</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74475</link>
		<dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74475</guid>
		<description>So, I suppose an interesting question is how much it costs now to build it with the parts wastage than it did before... 

It should theoretically be cheaper, but like you said, you have to buy more parts because some will go to waste... what kind of savings are we looking at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I suppose an interesting question is how much it costs now to build it with the parts wastage than it did before&#8230; </p>
<p>It should theoretically be cheaper, but like you said, you have to buy more parts because some will go to waste&#8230; what kind of savings are we looking at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74468</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74468</guid>
		<description>No two designers would make the same decisions, that&#039;s the way the world works :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No two designers would make the same decisions, that&#8217;s the way the world works <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74467</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74467</guid>
		<description>No. I used to sell the kit and it was a pain (and most people didn&#039;t want it anyway). Cutting individual resistor from the tape etc - messy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I used to sell the kit and it was a pain (and most people didn&#8217;t want it anyway). Cutting individual resistor from the tape etc &#8211; messy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74466</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74466</guid>
		<description>I have one, but not set up on my new machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one, but not set up on my new machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74465</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74465</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it will be cheaper. I&#039;m going to a locally made board which costs a lot more than the PCBcart one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it will be cheaper. I&#8217;m going to a locally made board which costs a lot more than the PCBcart one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74464</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74464</guid>
		<description>Damn, I think you are right. I must have goofed it when I re-orged the schematic into blocks and was dragging stuff around. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I think you are right. I must have goofed it when I re-orged the schematic into blocks and was dragging stuff around. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by hamed</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74422</link>
		<dc:creator>hamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74422</guid>
		<description>hi

this blog is very gooooooooooog :D
very very thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>this blog is very gooooooooooog <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
very very thanks <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Rennex</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74421</link>
		<dc:creator>Rennex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74421</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave, this PSU project is good stuff :)

But heads up, I think I see an error in the RevB schematic. Check it out: shouldn&#039;t the opamp U3B (for current limiting) have its inputs the other way round? Unless I&#039;m missing something, currently when measured current is lower than the setting, the opamp output goes high and the transistor clamps the voltage down, down, down... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, this PSU project is good stuff <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But heads up, I think I see an error in the RevB schematic. Check it out: shouldn&#8217;t the opamp U3B (for current limiting) have its inputs the other way round? Unless I&#8217;m missing something, currently when measured current is lower than the setting, the opamp output goes high and the transistor clamps the voltage down, down, down&#8230; <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #228 &#8211; New Lab Progress&#8230; by KJ6EAD</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/12/24/eevblog-228-new-lab-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-74408</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ6EAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1828#comment-74408</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very nice lab space.

Your benches will eventually need some diagonal bracing or corner gussets to stiffen them up so it&#039;s best to add them now before the joints get sloppy.

If you ever need to work on mechanical assemblies with sharp edges and screw heads, a piece of short pile high traffic carpet such as found in movie theatres will prevent damage to the bench and keep the unit from sliding around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very nice lab space.</p>
<p>Your benches will eventually need some diagonal bracing or corner gussets to stiffen them up so it&#8217;s best to add them now before the joints get sloppy.</p>
<p>If you ever need to work on mechanical assemblies with sharp edges and screw heads, a piece of short pile high traffic carpet such as found in movie theatres will prevent damage to the bench and keep the unit from sliding around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by László Monda</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74405</link>
		<dc:creator>László Monda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74405</guid>
		<description>Kudos for ya, Dave!  So clearly explained!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos for ya, Dave!  So clearly explained!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #132 &#8211; Delusional Dyson Marketing by PhysTchr</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2010/12/13/eevblog-132-delusional-dyson-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-74404</link>
		<dc:creator>PhysTchr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1215#comment-74404</guid>
		<description>Possible &quot;Digital Motor&quot; explained... 

Most motors in vacuums that plug into wall outlets in the US, speaking in relative integers similar to those used in discussing &quot;digital products,&quot; are AC motors... so they are more like alternating 1&#039;s and -1&#039;s.  (For Non-Electrical Folks: Current flows one way [1] then reverses [-1] while still forcing the motor the same direction.) This is certainly NOT digital.

BUT I suppose --using that same &quot;digital speak&quot;-- a motor &#039;might&#039; be constructed such that it ran (that is, it rotated) using the &quot;+1&quot; of AC current fast enough to allow for the motor to gain speed while receiving current (let&#039;s call this &quot;1&quot; phase), and spin hard and fast enough to turn right past a non-coiled, non-electromagnetized, or turned off portion of the motor (call this the &quot;0&quot; phase) and right back to the charged &quot;1&quot; phase that&#039;s receiving EM current.

So then, THIS motor I just described technically now runs on 1&#039;s and 0&#039;s -- TADA!  It&#039;s digital... AND it&#039;s exactly 1/2 as efficient in speed and up to 1/2 as energy efficient since it would be turning itself completely OFF 60 times per sec (60 Hz in the US) and then having to electrically &quot;restart&quot; the motor 60 times a sec., too.

BUT Why would the &quot;Brilliant Genius&quot; Mr. Dyson built a half-efficient motor?  Maybe the same reason a 4th grade science student would... he didn&#039;t understand it!

Only other explanation... just like most other replies, it&#039;s just like any other brushless motor but the Marketing folks know that many (or most) people just don&#039;t know even the most Basic Science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possible &#8220;Digital Motor&#8221; explained&#8230; </p>
<p>Most motors in vacuums that plug into wall outlets in the US, speaking in relative integers similar to those used in discussing &#8220;digital products,&#8221; are AC motors&#8230; so they are more like alternating 1&#8242;s and -1&#8242;s.  (For Non-Electrical Folks: Current flows one way [1] then reverses [-1] while still forcing the motor the same direction.) This is certainly NOT digital.</p>
<p>BUT I suppose &#8211;using that same &#8220;digital speak&#8221;&#8211; a motor &#8216;might&#8217; be constructed such that it ran (that is, it rotated) using the &#8220;+1&#8243; of AC current fast enough to allow for the motor to gain speed while receiving current (let&#8217;s call this &#8220;1&#8243; phase), and spin hard and fast enough to turn right past a non-coiled, non-electromagnetized, or turned off portion of the motor (call this the &#8220;0&#8243; phase) and right back to the charged &#8220;1&#8243; phase that&#8217;s receiving EM current.</p>
<p>So then, THIS motor I just described technically now runs on 1&#8242;s and 0&#8242;s &#8212; TADA!  It&#8217;s digital&#8230; AND it&#8217;s exactly 1/2 as efficient in speed and up to 1/2 as energy efficient since it would be turning itself completely OFF 60 times per sec (60 Hz in the US) and then having to electrically &#8220;restart&#8221; the motor 60 times a sec., too.</p>
<p>BUT Why would the &#8220;Brilliant Genius&#8221; Mr. Dyson built a half-efficient motor?  Maybe the same reason a 4th grade science student would&#8230; he didn&#8217;t understand it!</p>
<p>Only other explanation&#8230; just like most other replies, it&#8217;s just like any other brushless motor but the Marketing folks know that many (or most) people just don&#8217;t know even the most Basic Science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74402</guid>
		<description>Great Vid!
Can we expect a cheaper uCurrent kit from you in the near future for those of us who have yet to click &#039;add to cart&#039; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Vid!<br />
Can we expect a cheaper uCurrent kit from you in the near future for those of us who have yet to click &#8216;add to cart&#8217; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by vincent himpe</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74401</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent himpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74401</guid>
		<description>Dave, i see you use 10K on SDA/SCL . While that works fine on a 5 volt rail with a single device , on a 3.3 volts rail you are running marginally, especially with that many slaves. ... i would drop those to 3k3 ( i typically use the rule 1k per volt of rail, it gives you 1mA if current )

With that many chips on the bus you will have quite some capacitance. If you want to maintain reasonably clean rising edges you will need a bit of current there.

When routing : use the dasiy chain constraint on SDa and SCL and place the pull up resistors at the last point (farthest away from the cpu) . If the bus is getting to be reasonably long ( let&#039;s say over 10 inches) i typically split the pull ups and put a pair at both ends ( simply double the resistance value at this point. I put two sets of 4k7 giving me 2.35k effective per line ) from a 3.3 volt rail i get nice clean edges with a drive current of slightly over 1.2 milliamps.

just my 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, i see you use 10K on SDA/SCL . While that works fine on a 5 volt rail with a single device , on a 3.3 volts rail you are running marginally, especially with that many slaves. &#8230; i would drop those to 3k3 ( i typically use the rule 1k per volt of rail, it gives you 1mA if current )</p>
<p>With that many chips on the bus you will have quite some capacitance. If you want to maintain reasonably clean rising edges you will need a bit of current there.</p>
<p>When routing : use the dasiy chain constraint on SDa and SCL and place the pull up resistors at the last point (farthest away from the cpu) . If the bus is getting to be reasonably long ( let&#8217;s say over 10 inches) i typically split the pull ups and put a pair at both ends ( simply double the resistance value at this point. I put two sets of 4k7 giving me 2.35k effective per line ) from a 3.3 volt rail i get nice clean edges with a drive current of slightly over 1.2 milliamps.</p>
<p>just my 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by vincent himpe</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74400</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent himpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74400</guid>
		<description>Time to get a 3DConnexion space navigator Dave !

shift-drag just doesn&#039;t cut the cheese in 3d view.

I am using more and more step files in my designs. a lot of manufacturers have these avialable now for all their parts ( Molex , tyco , Bud and Hammond for their enclosures ) and you can find ton&#039;s of stuff in 3dcontentcentral.com. Most of the time, if you call a manufacturer, they will email you step files. It is becoming more and more prevalent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to get a 3DConnexion space navigator Dave !</p>
<p>shift-drag just doesn&#8217;t cut the cheese in 3d view.</p>
<p>I am using more and more step files in my designs. a lot of manufacturers have these avialable now for all their parts ( Molex , tyco , Bud and Hammond for their enclosures ) and you can find ton&#8217;s of stuff in 3dcontentcentral.com. Most of the time, if you call a manufacturer, they will email you step files. It is becoming more and more prevalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74398</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74398</guid>
		<description>Nice to see a use case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a use case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by koen</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-74394</link>
		<dc:creator>koen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-74394</guid>
		<description>hi, great blog! 

are you going to build / review this succer ?  and make video...

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, great blog! </p>
<p>are you going to build / review this succer ?  and make video&#8230;</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #239 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 by phangmoh</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/25/eevblog-239-pcb-design-for-manufacture-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74387</link>
		<dc:creator>phangmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1887#comment-74387</guid>
		<description>Just in time for my garage assembly to factory assembly! You might want to check the battery connector from 4UCON or MoreThanAll of Taiwan, way more cost effective and awesome quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in time for my garage assembly to factory assembly! You might want to check the battery connector from 4UCON or MoreThanAll of Taiwan, way more cost effective and awesome quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Rutger</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74374</link>
		<dc:creator>Rutger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74374</guid>
		<description>Could you not sell the kit as a kit? (Assembly required!), with assembly &amp; testing instructions included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you not sell the kit as a kit? (Assembly required!), with assembly &amp; testing instructions included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog #239 - PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 &#124; EEVblog - The Electronics Engineering Video Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74365</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog #239 - PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 &#124; EEVblog - The Electronics Engineering Video Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74365</guid>
		<description>[...] UP HERE: http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/ PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXE_dh38HjU A follow up to Dave&#8217;s popular PCB Design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UP HERE: <a href="http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/</a> PART 1: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXE_dh38HjU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXE_dh38HjU</a> A follow up to Dave&#8217;s popular PCB Design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Full review of the Rigol DS1052E by Cuong Chau</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2009/04/05/full-review-of-the-rigol-ds1052e/comment-page-1/#comment-74316</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong Chau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/?p=6#comment-74316</guid>
		<description>There is room for educated comments and feedbacks, here.

However, you should leave your ignorant racist slur off the forum, JeffS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is room for educated comments and feedbacks, here.</p>
<p>However, you should leave your ignorant racist slur off the forum, JeffS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74281</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74281</guid>
		<description>I like this series of videos, it gives many angles to a design process, even though I may not have made the same decisions as you, but again, I may have other preferences. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this series of videos, it gives many angles to a design process, even though I may not have made the same decisions as you, but again, I may have other preferences. <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by allan</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74255</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74255</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
Fantastic job!
Thanks!

Keep up the good work,
Allan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
Fantastic job!<br />
Thanks!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work,<br />
Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by olaf from bruehl</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74223</link>
		<dc:creator>olaf from bruehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74223</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

thanks for this series of tight technology teaching videos. They cover analog circuitry, SPI, I2C, rotary encoders, signal limiting, overload/reverse current testing and in the future possibly timing issues with I2C or software-SPI. Much we can learn from.
Go on with it!

cheers

Olaf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>thanks for this series of tight technology teaching videos. They cover analog circuitry, SPI, I2C, rotary encoders, signal limiting, overload/reverse current testing and in the future possibly timing issues with I2C or software-SPI. Much we can learn from.<br />
Go on with it!</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>Olaf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74208</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74208</guid>
		<description>Holy crap, so many complaints. I love this series, the fact that you have constraints (like thru hole, price and so on) makes it more like real life.

In a perfect world a single chip would do everything (and it does happen), but where&#039;s the fun in that? 

If I was teaching some students and wanted them to get a glimpse of the design process this is what I&#039;d have then look at. I learned some things myself. What more can you ask for?

Fantastic job, keep it up.

...mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap, so many complaints. I love this series, the fact that you have constraints (like thru hole, price and so on) makes it more like real life.</p>
<p>In a perfect world a single chip would do everything (and it does happen), but where&#8217;s the fun in that? </p>
<p>If I was teaching some students and wanted them to get a glimpse of the design process this is what I&#8217;d have then look at. I learned some things myself. What more can you ask for?</p>
<p>Fantastic job, keep it up.</p>
<p>&#8230;mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Wonko The Sane</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74204</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonko The Sane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74204</guid>
		<description>Dave,
     So the internal RC oscillator is not good enough, why not just use your FE-5680A Rubidium frequency reference ? - combine 2 projects in one, and have very stable clock for RS232 communication... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
     So the internal RC oscillator is not good enough, why not just use your FE-5680A Rubidium frequency reference ? &#8211; combine 2 projects in one, and have very stable clock for RS232 communication&#8230; <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Mal</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74192</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74192</guid>
		<description>Its way easier to find small faults in someone else&#039;s work and feel good about your self, then do all the hard work and take the chance you&#039;ll be criticized yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its way easier to find small faults in someone else&#8217;s work and feel good about your self, then do all the hard work and take the chance you&#8217;ll be criticized yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by fchk</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74175</link>
		<dc:creator>fchk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74175</guid>
		<description>... and this here:

http://timewitharduino.blogspot.com/2009/09/introducing-duino644.html

fchk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and this here:</p>
<p><a href="http://timewitharduino.blogspot.com/2009/09/introducing-duino644.html" rel="nofollow">http://timewitharduino.blogspot.com/2009/09/introducing-duino644.html</a></p>
<p>fchk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by fchk</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74174</link>
		<dc:creator>fchk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74174</guid>
		<description>Then look at http://sanguino.cc/
Mega 644p, DIP40, and Arduino Software.

fchk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then look at <a href="http://sanguino.cc/" rel="nofollow">http://sanguino.cc/</a><br />
Mega 644p, DIP40, and Arduino Software.</p>
<p>fchk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on µCurrent by Electronics-Lab.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; µCurrent &#8211; A Professional Precision Current Adapter for Multimeters</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/projects/ucurrent/comment-page-1/#comment-74173</link>
		<dc:creator>Electronics-Lab.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; µCurrent &#8211; A Professional Precision Current Adapter for Multimeters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?page_id=1568#comment-74173</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; A Professional Precision Current Adapter for Multieters - [Link]   Tags: Burden Voltage, Current, multimeter, µCurrent   Filed in Test/Measurements  &#124; 2 views  No [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; A Professional Precision Current Adapter for Multieters &#8211; [Link]   Tags: Burden Voltage, Current, multimeter, µCurrent   Filed in Test/Measurements  | 2 views  No [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Ondre</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ondre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74172</guid>
		<description>Man, what&#039;s wrong with people? Why is everyone bitching about this and that and asking questions that have been answered in previous blogs already?
Bit banging SPI or I2C is pretty simple, just have a look at the timing diagrams in the datasheets. It can be done with a few lines of code.
And for anyone who thinks that the schematic is messy, please, take a look at some hand drawn schematics of an old meter or something like that. Those can be pretty messy ;-)
I think Dave is doing a great job! Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, what&#8217;s wrong with people? Why is everyone bitching about this and that and asking questions that have been answered in previous blogs already?<br />
Bit banging SPI or I2C is pretty simple, just have a look at the timing diagrams in the datasheets. It can be done with a few lines of code.<br />
And for anyone who thinks that the schematic is messy, please, take a look at some hand drawn schematics of an old meter or something like that. Those can be pretty messy <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I think Dave is doing a great job! Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Inderpreet Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74170</link>
		<dc:creator>Inderpreet Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74170</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if it was possible to use an lm324... seems somewhat similar and available and more common :)
Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if it was possible to use an lm324&#8230; seems somewhat similar and available and more common <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74138</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74138</guid>
		<description>Send me an email, don&#039;t post here. What is your username and registered email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send me an email, don&#8217;t post here. What is your username and registered email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74137</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74137</guid>
		<description>Works for me and everyone else? Sorry, no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works for me and everyone else? Sorry, no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74136</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74136</guid>
		<description>Yep, fixing that now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, fixing that now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74135</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74135</guid>
		<description>20x2 LCD.
Link is up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20&#215;2 LCD.<br />
Link is up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74134</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74134</guid>
		<description>of course they will, it says so in the bottom corner...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course they will, it says so in the bottom corner&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74133</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74133</guid>
		<description>For the millionth time. It has to be DIP and it has to be Arduino compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the millionth time. It has to be DIP and it has to be Arduino compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74132</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74132</guid>
		<description>No, sorry. It&#039;s open source, so you can modify it any way you need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, sorry. It&#8217;s open source, so you can modify it any way you need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74131</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been asked this countless times now. I am leaving the hardware SPI free for the external serial interface, for Ethernet, or other serial device that needs it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been asked this countless times now. I am leaving the hardware SPI free for the external serial interface, for Ethernet, or other serial device that needs it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74130</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74130</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave, why not use the AVR&#039;s SPI pins instead of bit bashing using the pins you have selected. It will be much easier. The atmel programming interface should cause no issue with this, and would only be used for setting fuses and programming a bootloader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, why not use the AVR&#8217;s SPI pins instead of bit bashing using the pins you have selected. It will be much easier. The atmel programming interface should cause no issue with this, and would only be used for setting fuses and programming a bootloader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Worf</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74129</link>
		<dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74129</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that schematic&#039;s kinda messy.

Probably time to put it on separate pages.

Any word on getting a kit put together for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that schematic&#8217;s kinda messy.</p>
<p>Probably time to put it on separate pages.</p>
<p>Any word on getting a kit put together for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by DCFluX</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74128</link>
		<dc:creator>DCFluX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74128</guid>
		<description>Hello Dave,

I&#039;d love to have one of these but I think your target design was for a maximum output of 10 volts and alot of times I work on stuff that is 12 and 13.8 volts, would it be possible to make it output at least 16V but preferably 20?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to have one of these but I think your target design was for a maximum output of 10 volts and alot of times I work on stuff that is 12 and 13.8 volts, would it be possible to make it output at least 16V but preferably 20?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74126</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74126</guid>
		<description>My incredible deduction skills led me to this conclusion:

http://eevblog.com/uploads/uSupplyBenchRevB.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My incredible deduction skills led me to this conclusion:</p>
<p><a href="http://eevblog.com/uploads/uSupplyBenchRevB.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://eevblog.com/uploads/uSupplyBenchRevB.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #226 &#8211; Kindle Touch Review by Kindle Touch 3G &#124; ebook readers reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/12/18/eevblog-226-kindle-touch-review/comment-page-1/#comment-74116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle Touch 3G &#124; ebook readers reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1817#comment-74116</guid>
		<description>[...] Screensavers Kindle, Wi-Fi, 6&quot; E Ink Display - includes Special Offers &amp; Sponsored Screensavers  Kindle Fire, Full Color 7&quot; Multi-touch Display, Wi-Fi Visiting the store via the Kindle Touch 3G Ki...o=1&amp;a=B0051VVOB2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Screensavers Kindle, Wi-Fi, 6&quot; E Ink Display &#8211; includes Special Offers &amp; Sponsored Screensavers  Kindle Fire, Full Color 7&quot; Multi-touch Display, Wi-Fi Visiting the store via the Kindle Touch 3G Ki&#8230;o=1&amp;a=B0051VVOB2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Urb anwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74114</link>
		<dc:creator>Urb anwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74114</guid>
		<description>I made the registration no problem, phew! And, having been beat 3 times now when uCurrents were available I&#039;ll have my credit card with me at all times.

Please, oh, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the registration no problem, phew! And, having been beat 3 times now when uCurrents were available I&#8217;ll have my credit card with me at all times.</p>
<p>Please, oh, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by fchk</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74112</link>
		<dc:creator>fchk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74112</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t you simply choose a larger micro? A 644PA probably would have saved you the extra IO ports, and there are additional bonuses like a second UART, SPI capability of hardware UARTs etc thown in.

fchk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t you simply choose a larger micro? A 644PA probably would have saved you the extra IO ports, and there are additional bonuses like a second UART, SPI capability of hardware UARTs etc thown in.</p>
<p>fchk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by William</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74109</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74109</guid>
		<description>The schematic is pretty unreadable!  You probably tried to get it down in size, but good practice would dictate that a schematic should show a clear functional flow of the system.  
As-is, the schematic looks like a mosaic.  A random observer wouldn&#039;t even know it&#039;s a power supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The schematic is pretty unreadable!  You probably tried to get it down in size, but good practice would dictate that a schematic should show a clear functional flow of the system.<br />
As-is, the schematic looks like a mosaic.  A random observer wouldn&#8217;t even know it&#8217;s a power supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by Pixel_K</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74105</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixel_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74105</guid>
		<description>Excellent evolutions ! The RGB LCD is a bit &quot;too much&quot; for my taste, but having extra I/Os is really nice.
Will you use a 16x2 or a 20x4 LCD ?
I&#039;m blind or stupid (or both) Where&#039;s the pdf ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent evolutions ! The RGB LCD is a bit &#8220;too much&#8221; for my taste, but having extra I/Os is really nice.<br />
Will you use a 16&#215;2 or a 20&#215;4 LCD ?<br />
I&#8217;m blind or stupid (or both) Where&#8217;s the pdf ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #238 &#8211; Power Supply Design Part 7 by poco</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/20/eevblog-238-power-supply-design-part-7/comment-page-1/#comment-74100</link>
		<dc:creator>poco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1883#comment-74100</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave , itunes podcast version shows the makerbot video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave , itunes podcast version shows the makerbot video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-74086</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-74086</guid>
		<description>Dave, you might consider working out a better photo of your product.
I would suggest closing down the aperture to increase the depth of field so all silk screen labels are clearly visible. A different angle in shooting would also help to show it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you might consider working out a better photo of your product.<br />
I would suggest closing down the aperture to increase the depth of field so all silk screen labels are clearly visible. A different angle in shooting would also help to show it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Worf</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-74056</link>
		<dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-74056</guid>
		<description>Definitely nice, if I could afford one. Or have the time to build it.

Kapton tape&#039;s fairly expensive - I know we used to pay $80 for one roll of it (the thin stuff), so that huge roll and all the other rolls probably account for a good chunk of the cost...

Impressed with the quality of the stuff though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely nice, if I could afford one. Or have the time to build it.</p>
<p>Kapton tape&#8217;s fairly expensive &#8211; I know we used to pay $80 for one roll of it (the thin stuff), so that huge roll and all the other rolls probably account for a good chunk of the cost&#8230;</p>
<p>Impressed with the quality of the stuff though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by bill</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74030</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74030</guid>
		<description>yep tried that .no activation email comes.tried to sign in with the forgot password option.that dont work.it goes round and round in a loop.when i try registering with the same email account it comes back with another member is using that email address but hasn&#039;t activated it...meh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep tried that .no activation email comes.tried to sign in with the forgot password option.that dont work.it goes round and round in a loop.when i try registering with the same email account it comes back with another member is using that email address but hasn&#8217;t activated it&#8230;meh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Shaun Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74015</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74015</guid>
		<description>Do you have another email address you can try registering with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have another email address you can try registering with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by bill</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74002</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-74002</guid>
		<description>hi, tried reistering on the eevblog forum twice.the activation email never arrives ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, tried reistering on the eevblog forum twice.the activation email never arrives ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by johnnyk</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73995</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73995</guid>
		<description>Are you planning build video and review of completed printer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you planning build video and review of completed printer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #226 &#8211; Kindle Touch Review by Kindle US Power Adapter (Not included with Kindle or Kindle Touch) &#124; Tablets Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/12/18/eevblog-226-kindle-touch-review/comment-page-1/#comment-73976</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle US Power Adapter (Not included with Kindle or Kindle Touch) &#124; Tablets Computer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1817#comment-73976</guid>
		<description>[...] DX in 4 hours or less * See Kindle User&#039;s Guide for instructions and important safety information  * The United States Kindle power adapter * Approved charger for Kindle, Kindle Touch, Kindle Keyboa...&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; * The United States Kindle power adapter * Approved charger for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DX in 4 hours or less * See Kindle User&#039;s Guide for instructions and important safety information  * The United States Kindle power adapter * Approved charger for Kindle, Kindle Touch, Kindle Keyboa&#8230;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; * The United States Kindle power adapter * Approved charger for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-73973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-73973</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity what&#039;s the lead time from you placing an order with your supplier / manufacturer to receiving the product?  Is it predictable? 

If so you would be able to post a date when the next batch will be available so that way when a person orders a device / kit they will already know when it should ship out to them.

I of course would pad the date.  Everybody loves getting stuff early.  It&#039;s always a pleasant surprise however nobody likes getting things late hence the padding.

As for the taking peoples money before you have something to deliver.  That&#039;s something you have to work out on your own.  I can think of many examples of businesses doing it both ways and for entirely legitimate reasons. 

If you really don&#039;t feel comfortable with it you can put it into an escrow account rather than using it to pay for the next (or current) order.

I just see a classic supply and demand problem.  It&#039;s obvious there&#039;s more than enough demand since you seem to sell out within minutes to hours with each order.  Supply seems to be the issue and I&#039;d rather see you make more money. I&#039;m somewhat surprised their isn&#039;t a secondary market already for the uCurrent devices given the demand.

 Just my two bits worth. Take it for what it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity what&#8217;s the lead time from you placing an order with your supplier / manufacturer to receiving the product?  Is it predictable? </p>
<p>If so you would be able to post a date when the next batch will be available so that way when a person orders a device / kit they will already know when it should ship out to them.</p>
<p>I of course would pad the date.  Everybody loves getting stuff early.  It&#8217;s always a pleasant surprise however nobody likes getting things late hence the padding.</p>
<p>As for the taking peoples money before you have something to deliver.  That&#8217;s something you have to work out on your own.  I can think of many examples of businesses doing it both ways and for entirely legitimate reasons. </p>
<p>If you really don&#8217;t feel comfortable with it you can put it into an escrow account rather than using it to pay for the next (or current) order.</p>
<p>I just see a classic supply and demand problem.  It&#8217;s obvious there&#8217;s more than enough demand since you seem to sell out within minutes to hours with each order.  Supply seems to be the issue and I&#8217;d rather see you make more money. I&#8217;m somewhat surprised their isn&#8217;t a secondary market already for the uCurrent devices given the demand.</p>
<p> Just my two bits worth. Take it for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-73967</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-73967</guid>
		<description>Entirely up to you.
But if you are US based, you&#039;ll get hit with the $9 US &quot;security&quot; surcharge due to the combined weight.
Realistically, the PSU kit is some way off. First proto isn&#039;t assembled yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entirely up to you.<br />
But if you are US based, you&#8217;ll get hit with the $9 US &#8220;security&#8221; surcharge due to the combined weight.<br />
Realistically, the PSU kit is some way off. First proto isn&#8217;t assembled yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Marius Jonsson</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-73954</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Jonsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-73954</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I really want one. It&#039;d be great buy one + two kits of the new power supply series when it is out. But I&#039;d like to save on shipping by ordering them all together.

Do you think I should sign the list or wait till the power supply kit comes available?

Thanks :)

Marius</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I really want one. It&#8217;d be great buy one + two kits of the new power supply series when it is out. But I&#8217;d like to save on shipping by ordering them all together.</p>
<p>Do you think I should sign the list or wait till the power supply kit comes available?</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Marius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-73950</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-73950</guid>
		<description>Two reasons:
1) I don&#039;t like taking people&#039;s money before i have something to ship.
2) You end up with people keep emailing you all the time for updates etc (if you don&#039;t think they don&#039;t, then you haven&#039;t been in the mail order business!). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two reasons:<br />
1) I don&#8217;t like taking people&#8217;s money before i have something to ship.<br />
2) You end up with people keep emailing you all the time for updates etc (if you don&#8217;t think they don&#8217;t, then you haven&#8217;t been in the mail order business!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent Request List by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/18/ucurrent-request-list/comment-page-1/#comment-73936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1880#comment-73936</guid>
		<description>Dare I ask the question -- Why not just presell them?  I am certain many people would happy pay now and it would at the same time alleviate the need to float the cash until they&#039;re ordered, made, and sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dare I ask the question &#8212; Why not just presell them?  I am certain many people would happy pay now and it would at the same time alleviate the need to float the cash until they&#8217;re ordered, made, and sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73917</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73917</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a standard installation of ZenCart, a very widely used shopping cart system.
Any issues with Safari are out of my control I&#039;m afraid, I don&#039;t even have Safari to test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a standard installation of ZenCart, a very widely used shopping cart system.<br />
Any issues with Safari are out of my control I&#8217;m afraid, I don&#8217;t even have Safari to test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #90 &#8211; Linear and LDO regulators and Switch Mode Power Supply Tutorial by Mihai</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2010/05/29/eevblog-90-linear-and-ldo-regulators-and-switch-mode-power-supply-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-73915</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=792#comment-73915</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve missed one important detail....

In case of a LDO regulator, the reference voltage[REF] must be applied on inverting(–)
input of the error amplifier because the PNP transistor inverts the phase by 180°, thus the overall feedback should be 180°(negative feedback). Of course, the middle point of the resistive divider should be tied to noninverting(+) input.

No offense meant.


Mihai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve missed one important detail&#8230;.</p>
<p>In case of a LDO regulator, the reference voltage[REF] must be applied on inverting(–)<br />
input of the error amplifier because the PNP transistor inverts the phase by 180°, thus the overall feedback should be 180°(negative feedback). Of course, the middle point of the resistive divider should be tied to noninverting(+) input.</p>
<p>No offense meant.</p>
<p>Mihai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by trentland</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73912</link>
		<dc:creator>trentland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73912</guid>
		<description>Haha!  I smell everything!  My wife thinks it very weird, but hell- she doesn&#039;t know what she&#039;s missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!  I smell everything!  My wife thinks it very weird, but hell- she doesn&#8217;t know what she&#8217;s missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #232 &#8211; Lab Power Supply Design Part 5 by Engineering Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/06/eevblog-232-lab-power-supply-design-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-73904</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineering Videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1856#comment-73904</guid>
		<description>awful piece of information, I had come to know about your blog from my friend vimal, mumbai,i have read atleast 13 posts of yours by now, and let me tell you, your blog gives the best and the most interesting information. This is just the kind of information that i had been looking for, i&#039;m already your rss reader now and i would regularly watch out for the new posts, once again hats off to you! Thanks a million once again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awful piece of information, I had come to know about your blog from my friend vimal, mumbai,i have read atleast 13 posts of yours by now, and let me tell you, your blog gives the best and the most interesting information. This is just the kind of information that i had been looking for, i&#8217;m already your rss reader now and i would regularly watch out for the new posts, once again hats off to you! Thanks a million once again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by Tuck</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73901</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73901</guid>
		<description>Looks to be sold out agian....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks to be sold out agian&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #127 &#8211; PCB Design For Manufacture Tutorial by Alexandre 'Tabajara' Souza</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2010/11/15/eevblog-127-pcb-design-for-manufacture-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-73900</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre 'Tabajara' Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1172#comment-73900</guid>
		<description>...Which is not working anymore, tried to download #112 and #117 and a &quot;file not found&quot; message appears. Can you correct, Dave? :oD Congratulations for such a nice video blog, I hope someday to do something this way :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Which is not working anymore, tried to download #112 and #117 and a &#8220;file not found&#8221; message appears. Can you correct, Dave? <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> D Congratulations for such a nice video blog, I hope someday to do something this way <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by ThomasW</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73886</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73886</guid>
		<description>Hello Dave,

this uCurrent is a great idea. It&#039;s remarkable that no one has published such a circuit before.

Best regards,

Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dave,</p>
<p>this uCurrent is a great idea. It&#8217;s remarkable that no one has published such a circuit before.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by Rubi</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73877</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I am also happy I could hunt one down. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I am also happy I could hunt one down. <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by David Weight</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73876</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73876</guid>
		<description>Great-managed to get one for work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great-managed to get one for work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Alteritous Andy's Absquatulation &#124; The Amp Hour</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73861</link>
		<dc:creator>Alteritous Andy's Absquatulation &#124; The Amp Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73861</guid>
		<description>[...] got and has unboxed his MakerBot Thing-o-matic. Chris met one of the 3D printing competitors today from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got and has unboxed his MakerBot Thing-o-matic. Chris met one of the 3D printing competitors today from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73848</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73848</guid>
		<description>Dave
Just ordered 1 off ebay cost was $45 delivered.While searching around for info came across this site. 
http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/PROJ/Ruby4.htm

Which appears to have the info needed to make the output variable from around 1K to 15M even has a DOS program for configuring the frequency.


Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave<br />
Just ordered 1 off ebay cost was $45 delivered.While searching around for info came across this site.<br />
<a href="http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/PROJ/Ruby4.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/PROJ/Ruby4.htm</a></p>
<p>Which appears to have the info needed to make the output variable from around 1K to 15M even has a DOS program for configuring the frequency.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uCurrent&#8217;s back in stock by Dale B</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/17/ucurrents-back-in-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-73847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1878#comment-73847</guid>
		<description>Well, at least they&#039;re still in stock this time. However, the checkout page says that there is a PayPal option; &quot;Just hit the button.&quot; No PayPal button though. I guess that you&#039;ll probably sell them anyhow.

Maybe you page doesn&#039;t work with Safari. Amateur-ville.

Dale B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least they&#8217;re still in stock this time. However, the checkout page says that there is a PayPal option; &#8220;Just hit the button.&#8221; No PayPal button though. I guess that you&#8217;ll probably sell them anyhow.</p>
<p>Maybe you page doesn&#8217;t work with Safari. Amateur-ville.</p>
<p>Dale B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73810</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73810</guid>
		<description>Not much at all actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much at all actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Run An Open Source Hardware Company by Jerald Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2010/08/26/how-to-run-an-open-source-hardware-company/comment-page-1/#comment-73805</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerald Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1026#comment-73805</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j53LF7rc_hQ

This is the video for the exact same talk... kinda nice to see the slides :)

Jerald Thomas
jeraldamo@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j53LF7rc_hQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j53LF7rc_hQ</a></p>
<p>This is the video for the exact same talk&#8230; kinda nice to see the slides <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jerald Thomas<br />
<a href="mailto:jeraldamo@gmail.com">jeraldamo@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Wartex</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wartex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73793</guid>
		<description>That totally depends on how much money you make off ads on youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That totally depends on how much money you make off ads on youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Asm</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73792</link>
		<dc:creator>Asm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73792</guid>
		<description>You know, if your (main) camera has a composite/component output that is active when in use (and, ideally, if you can hide the menu and info readouts), you could pick up a cheap USB capture stick for &lt;$20 and use that to provide the live feeds. DealExtreme has some - I&#039;ve got SKU 11267 which works just fine, and there&#039;s also SKU 113103 which has component inputs.


Anyway, it&#039;d avoid having to hold things in front of two different cameras when doing live shows, plus I imagine it&#039;d be more convenient to have your camera on a tripod than using the built-in one on the laptop. 

The capture sticks appear as a plain old video capture source in Windows, and should be usable with whatever software you use for the live shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if your (main) camera has a composite/component output that is active when in use (and, ideally, if you can hide the menu and info readouts), you could pick up a cheap USB capture stick for &lt;$20 and use that to provide the live feeds. DealExtreme has some &#8211; I&#039;ve got SKU 11267 which works just fine, and there&#039;s also SKU 113103 which has component inputs.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#039;d avoid having to hold things in front of two different cameras when doing live shows, plus I imagine it&#039;d be more convenient to have your camera on a tripod than using the built-in one on the laptop. </p>
<p>The capture sticks appear as a plain old video capture source in Windows, and should be usable with whatever software you use for the live shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #235 &#8211; Rubidium Frequency Standard by f4eru</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-235-rubidium-frequency-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-73789</link>
		<dc:creator>f4eru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1867#comment-73789</guid>
		<description>The component on the quartz could be a PTC, intended for stabilizing the XTAL in temperature. (would explain the foam).
Or even more clever, could it be a heating rresistor for using the temperature for &quot;pulling&quot; the quartz as a VCXO ?

Concerning freq references, it would be also clever to avoid the rubidium, and to lock a 10 MHz VCXO on a GPS pps output... advantage : the same uC cold also be used as a freq. meter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The component on the quartz could be a PTC, intended for stabilizing the XTAL in temperature. (would explain the foam).<br />
Or even more clever, could it be a heating rresistor for using the temperature for &#8220;pulling&#8221; the quartz as a VCXO ?</p>
<p>Concerning freq references, it would be also clever to avoid the rubidium, and to lock a 10 MHz VCXO on a GPS pps output&#8230; advantage : the same uC cold also be used as a freq. meter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by R2theG</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73781</link>
		<dc:creator>R2theG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73781</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with Robert although I’m not the owner of an Ultimaker. The really tiny build platform was also the first thing that I noticed when watching the video. I have recently built a RepRap together with some fellow students and it has a 20x20cm print area and only costs about half as much as a TOM. What also amazed me was the amount of circuit boards included, our RepRap only has one eurocard and some stepsticks(motor drivers) sitting on that eurocard so total size of the electronics stays within 10x16cm. That being said, it looks like the TOM a well prepared kit (with a nice wiki) and looks like it is easy to put together.
 
I personally like the idea of RepRap where the printer is built from 3d printed parts and stuff you can buy locally. Also you can print the parts for a RepRap and give them to other people who want to build one, or print improved parts for your own RepRap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with Robert although I’m not the owner of an Ultimaker. The really tiny build platform was also the first thing that I noticed when watching the video. I have recently built a RepRap together with some fellow students and it has a 20x20cm print area and only costs about half as much as a TOM. What also amazed me was the amount of circuit boards included, our RepRap only has one eurocard and some stepsticks(motor drivers) sitting on that eurocard so total size of the electronics stays within 10x16cm. That being said, it looks like the TOM a well prepared kit (with a nice wiki) and looks like it is easy to put together.</p>
<p>I personally like the idea of RepRap where the printer is built from 3d printed parts and stuff you can buy locally. Also you can print the parts for a RepRap and give them to other people who want to build one, or print improved parts for your own RepRap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #235 &#8211; Rubidium Frequency Standard by Rubi</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-235-rubidium-frequency-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-73775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1867#comment-73775</guid>
		<description>Wow

And I thought my Lpro 101 was cheap.
Thank you for the hint, at these prices I immeadetly had to buy one.

I also have a Gps locked Rbidium source from Ebay, but I am not sure if that is more stable than the Lpro 101. Furthermor I do not have the equiment to test the stability. If you have any ideas how to test the stability of an oscillator it would make a great tutorial.
Phase noise measurements would be interesting also.

Cheers
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow</p>
<p>And I thought my Lpro 101 was cheap.<br />
Thank you for the hint, at these prices I immeadetly had to buy one.</p>
<p>I also have a Gps locked Rbidium source from Ebay, but I am not sure if that is more stable than the Lpro 101. Furthermor I do not have the equiment to test the stability. If you have any ideas how to test the stability of an oscillator it would make a great tutorial.<br />
Phase noise measurements would be interesting also.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Wonko The Sane</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73768</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonko The Sane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73768</guid>
		<description>Will you be recording a time laps of putting each module together ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you be recording a time laps of putting each module together ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Ross McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73764</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73764</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

You may find the details in this link of use in your attempts to understand and control the unit.

Cheers,

Ross

http://www.vk3um.com/Fe-5680A4.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>You may find the details in this link of use in your attempts to understand and control the unit.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ross</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vk3um.com/Fe-5680A4.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.vk3um.com/Fe-5680A4.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Claudio</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73763</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73763</guid>
		<description>Hehe, you are probably right :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, you are probably right <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73762</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73762</guid>
		<description>I recently bought and built an Ultimaker (it was actually printing as I was watching this :) ). I have to say that I was a bit surprised at the amount of parts on this thing. Then again it might be because of the front panel (which IMHO is pointless) and the automatic build platform that Dave got. I dunno, my printer just seemed less complicated some how.

This was also the first time I actually saw the print bed in someone&#039;s hands and wow, it&#039;s tiny! The Ultimaker version is gigantic in comparison. Makerbots new printer seems to be going in the direction of the Ultimaker setup (I know the Ultimaker wasn&#039;t first but it&#039;s my only reference) though and will get a larger print area which is great.

Once you get this thing assembled I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll find yourself coming up with stuff to print that you never thought you&#039;d need. I know I do :D Right now I&#039;m designing a custom enclosure for a little project I&#039;m working on. The satisfaction you get from designing something on your computer, get it over to the printer, hit print and a few minutes later you have it in your hand... it&#039;s amazing.



And no, I wont be getting any money for mentioning a competing printer so don&#039;t even go there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought and built an Ultimaker (it was actually printing as I was watching this <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). I have to say that I was a bit surprised at the amount of parts on this thing. Then again it might be because of the front panel (which IMHO is pointless) and the automatic build platform that Dave got. I dunno, my printer just seemed less complicated some how.</p>
<p>This was also the first time I actually saw the print bed in someone&#8217;s hands and wow, it&#8217;s tiny! The Ultimaker version is gigantic in comparison. Makerbots new printer seems to be going in the direction of the Ultimaker setup (I know the Ultimaker wasn&#8217;t first but it&#8217;s my only reference) though and will get a larger print area which is great.</p>
<p>Once you get this thing assembled I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find yourself coming up with stuff to print that you never thought you&#8217;d need. I know I do <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Right now I&#8217;m designing a custom enclosure for a little project I&#8217;m working on. The satisfaction you get from designing something on your computer, get it over to the printer, hit print and a few minutes later you have it in your hand&#8230; it&#8217;s amazing.</p>
<p>And no, I wont be getting any money for mentioning a competing printer so don&#8217;t even go there <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73761</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73761</guid>
		<description>uh.. sry, wrote to fast, it&#039;s not the live stream ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh.. sry, wrote to fast, it&#8217;s not the live stream <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73760</guid>
		<description>The tape you wondered what it is seems to be polyimide tape aka Kapton tape. It&#039;s quite good temperature resistant tape. I think you&#039;ve seen it inside some elektronics before.
Oh .. and your new lab looks great ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tape you wondered what it is seems to be polyimide tape aka Kapton tape. It&#8217;s quite good temperature resistant tape. I think you&#8217;ve seen it inside some elektronics before.<br />
Oh .. and your new lab looks great ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73756</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73756</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t be so jealous if you knew how much it cost... :-&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t be so jealous if you knew how much it cost&#8230; :-></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by EEVblog</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73755</link>
		<dc:creator>EEVblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73755</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think they are still too expensive for the mainstream. You&#039;d have to be a keen &quot;early adopter&quot; to buy one. But buy it people do...
I would not have bought one with my own money, but that&#039;s just my own tight-arse opinion.
If you can afford it, and it works for you and is valuable, then it&#039;s well worth the money and good value.
But if you are just playing around, then IMO it&#039;s a lot of money to hand over.
I got this one for free, so I&#039;m not complaining :-&gt;

So whilst I think that they are quite expensive, as to whether they are &quot;overpriced&quot;, well, you&#039;d have to look at the actual BOM cost and profit margins. I don&#039;t have that data. But if they are overpriced, then there is a big market waiting to be tapped for a lower cost / lower margin model.
It&#039;s open source, so anyone can do that....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think they are still too expensive for the mainstream. You&#8217;d have to be a keen &#8220;early adopter&#8221; to buy one. But buy it people do&#8230;<br />
I would not have bought one with my own money, but that&#8217;s just my own tight-arse opinion.<br />
If you can afford it, and it works for you and is valuable, then it&#8217;s well worth the money and good value.<br />
But if you are just playing around, then IMO it&#8217;s a lot of money to hand over.<br />
I got this one for free, so I&#8217;m not complaining :-></p>
<p>So whilst I think that they are quite expensive, as to whether they are &#8220;overpriced&#8221;, well, you&#8217;d have to look at the actual BOM cost and profit margins. I don&#8217;t have that data. But if they are overpriced, then there is a big market waiting to be tapped for a lower cost / lower margin model.<br />
It&#8217;s open source, so anyone can do that&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Claudio</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73754</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73754</guid>
		<description>I just love your new lab! Boy I&#039;m so jealous :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love your new lab! Boy I&#8217;m so jealous <img src='http://www.eevblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #237 &#8211; Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Unboxing by Drone</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/15/eevblog-237-makerbot-thing-o-matic-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-73750</link>
		<dc:creator>Drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1876#comment-73750</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m of the opinion that any of these homebuild printers that costs over a thousand bucks is waaay over-priced. I&#039;d appreciate your take on that Dave.

Good Luck, David in Jakarta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that any of these homebuild printers that costs over a thousand bucks is waaay over-priced. I&#8217;d appreciate your take on that Dave.</p>
<p>Good Luck, David in Jakarta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #231 &#8211; 2011 by http://tinyurl.com/7w8zhxz</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/01/eevblog-231-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-73740</link>
		<dc:creator>http://tinyurl.com/7w8zhxz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1848#comment-73740</guid>
		<description>!Important! I really like your website, it&#039;s well built and the content is very good so I&#039;d like to ask you a question: As a website owner, have you ever wanted to make money off of your website? Not just a few bucks a month, but hundreds or thousands of bucks every month. If you click my name you&#039;ll learn about a money making online marketing course that offers to teach you how to make thousands of dollars per month running websites and campaigns just like this one. The video is free so just take a few minutes and watch it, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll regret it. Consider this a friendly tip about one of the best internet marketing courses available. Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!Important! I really like your website, it&#8217;s well built and the content is very good so I&#8217;d like to ask you a question: As a website owner, have you ever wanted to make money off of your website? Not just a few bucks a month, but hundreds or thousands of bucks every month. If you click my name you&#8217;ll learn about a money making online marketing course that offers to teach you how to make thousands of dollars per month running websites and campaigns just like this one. The video is free so just take a few minutes and watch it, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll regret it. Consider this a friendly tip about one of the best internet marketing courses available. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73737</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re tantalum capacitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re tantalum capacitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73729</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73729</guid>
		<description>What are all the orange devices?    Look like little plastic orange boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are all the orange devices?    Look like little plastic orange boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #234 &#8211; Agilent U1733C LCR Meter Teardown by iva</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-234-agilent-u1733c-lcr-meter-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73707</link>
		<dc:creator>iva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1863#comment-73707</guid>
		<description>We want the review, review, review!

Have the guys at Peaktech in Germany ever sent you anything for review Dave?

I&#039;m very satisfied with my Peaktech multimeter and they&#039;re coming out with an portable LCR meter that does 100 KHz as well next week (in theory).

Would be really nice to see how it compares against the Agilent, being at a cheaper price but with similar characteristics:
http://www.peaktech.de/productdetail/kategorie/lcr-messer/produkt/peaktech-2170.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want the review, review, review!</p>
<p>Have the guys at Peaktech in Germany ever sent you anything for review Dave?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very satisfied with my Peaktech multimeter and they&#8217;re coming out with an portable LCR meter that does 100 KHz as well next week (in theory).</p>
<p>Would be really nice to see how it compares against the Agilent, being at a cheaper price but with similar characteristics:<br />
<a href="http://www.peaktech.de/productdetail/kategorie/lcr-messer/produkt/peaktech-2170.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.peaktech.de/productdetail/kategorie/lcr-messer/produkt/peaktech-2170.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73703</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73703</guid>
		<description>Ditto on the thermistor - I&#039;ve got some around here that look just about exactly like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on the thermistor &#8211; I&#8217;ve got some around here that look just about exactly like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73652</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73652</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a technical manual for the 5680A at http://www.ham-radio.com/wa6vhs/Test%20equipment/FREQUENCY%20STANDARDS/FE-5680A/5680%20TECH%20MANUAL.pdf

On sheet 13 is the pinouts and commands used to talk to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a technical manual for the 5680A at <a href="http://www.ham-radio.com/wa6vhs/Test%20equipment/FREQUENCY%20STANDARDS/FE-5680A/5680%20TECH%20MANUAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ham-radio.com/wa6vhs/Test%20equipment/FREQUENCY%20STANDARDS/FE-5680A/5680%20TECH%20MANUAL.pdf</a></p>
<p>On sheet 13 is the pinouts and commands used to talk to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #236 &#8211; FE-5680A Rubidium Standard Teardown by Phil Pemberton</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/14/eevblog-236-fe-5680a-rubidium-standard-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-73651</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Pemberton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1870#comment-73651</guid>
		<description>The disc-shaped thing on the top of the crystal is effectively a small crystal oven. It&#039;s a high-power thermistor, which is rigged to maintain a constant temperature. If the temperature rises, the resistance rises too, and vice versa -- thus, it will tend to reach a thermal equilibrium.

If that&#039;s under the foam -- no doubt the foam is intended to act as thermal insulation to protect it from thermal shocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The disc-shaped thing on the top of the crystal is effectively a small crystal oven. It&#8217;s a high-power thermistor, which is rigged to maintain a constant temperature. If the temperature rises, the resistance rises too, and vice versa &#8212; thus, it will tend to reach a thermal equilibrium.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s under the foam &#8212; no doubt the foam is intended to act as thermal insulation to protect it from thermal shocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #226 &#8211; Kindle Touch Review by Mike Kawasaki</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2011/12/18/eevblog-226-kindle-touch-review/comment-page-1/#comment-73648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kawasaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1817#comment-73648</guid>
		<description>Just saw the Kindle Keyboard 3G (with ads) at Target (US) on sale for $99.  It is very tempting.  Amazed that they can sell for such a low price.

My daughter got one for Christmas.  She loves it.  As everyone has already mentioned, the e-ink screen is superior for reading.  I no longer use my iPad for reading -- and just &quot;borrow&quot; hers after she goes to bed.

@ $99 going to get one for myself.

p.s.  Target web site won&#039;t sell Kindle.  You have to go into the store for the special price.  I live in the Bay Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw the Kindle Keyboard 3G (with ads) at Target (US) on sale for $99.  It is very tempting.  Amazed that they can sell for such a low price.</p>
<p>My daughter got one for Christmas.  She loves it.  As everyone has already mentioned, the e-ink screen is superior for reading.  I no longer use my iPad for reading &#8212; and just &#8220;borrow&#8221; hers after she goes to bed.</p>
<p>@ $99 going to get one for myself.</p>
<p>p.s.  Target web site won&#8217;t sell Kindle.  You have to go into the store for the special price.  I live in the Bay Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #233 &#8211; Lab Power Supply Design Part 6 &#8211; LT3080 Testing by DrRuss</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/11/eevblog-233-lab-power-supply-design-part-6-lt3080-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-73639</link>
		<dc:creator>DrRuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1860#comment-73639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not shure if this is intended or not, but on the homepage of this site you are not showing the newest episodes. For example today only episode 233 is visible on the homepage, while under episode list its already episode 236.

I absolutely love your show. Keep on going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not shure if this is intended or not, but on the homepage of this site you are not showing the newest episodes. For example today only episode 233 is visible on the homepage, while under episode list its already episode 236.</p>
<p>I absolutely love your show. Keep on going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #232 &#8211; Lab Power Supply Design Part 5 by Michael B.</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2012/01/06/eevblog-232-lab-power-supply-design-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-73608</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=1856#comment-73608</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Excellent video series. Will you be addressing the design of a dual tracking power supply with + and - floating outputs?

Thanks,
Michael B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Excellent video series. Will you be addressing the design of a dual tracking power supply with + and &#8211; floating outputs?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Michael B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEVblog #90 &#8211; Linear and LDO regulators and Switch Mode Power Supply Tutorial by Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://www.eevblog.com/2010/05/29/eevblog-90-linear-and-ldo-regulators-and-switch-mode-power-supply-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-73602</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eevblog.com/?p=792#comment-73602</guid>
		<description>Thanks! 

This was very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! </p>
<p>This was very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

