- Fig. 3 and 4 have TC compensation, while Fig. 2 will have temperature drift due to 2 PN junctions in series.
Yep, sometimes you *want* a specific temperature coefficient on the output. Figure 2 will also operate at much lower input voltages where zener diodes do not work well anyway.
- The operating point of the base in Fig. 2 will generally be unwanted low because the emitter is raised by a single diode voltage drop.
That is not necessarily a problem. D1 could be replaced by a bandgap voltage reference and temperature compensation could be added to Q2. It is possible to make a bandgap voltage reverence with an output of 200 millivolts allowing for very low voltage operation; check out the old National LM10 combined reference and operational amplifier. Note that the voltage gain of the whole circuit multiplies not only the reference voltage produced by Q2's Vbe and D1 but also their noise.
You can make a pretty good low voltage temperature compensated reference with an LED and transistor.
- Fig. 2 and 4 will have constant current bias of the emitter diode (R2) / the emitter zener (R32). Fig. 3 will have current varying with supply level and ripple via R4.
That is right. R4 in figure 3 impedes the line regulation because the variation in line voltage changes the current through the reference.
- The auxiliary supply from R30 in Fig.4 and the high R31's effect on gain of the error amplifier. What determines choice of collector current?
The collector current affects all kinds of things including the transconductance and voltage noise by altering the emitter resistance of the transistor and it sets a minimum value for the current through the reference. Offhand I do not know how they selected it so let us see ...
The collector is at 9 volts so R31 provides 0.1 milliamps. R32 provides 2.9 milliamps. So the collector current is 0.1 milliamps which is typical for a high beta low noise transistor and the zener diode sees 3.0 milliamps total which is typical. Those are suspiciously nice round numbers so probably not an accident. I think that is an RCA part but Motorola made them also they give specifications for a 5 milliamp zener current and 250 microamp collector current. I think they used such a low collector current in this case to minimize the bias current into the base through the feedback divider.
- The differential amplifier with operating point R27 / (R27+R28) x 10v = 9.016 volt nominally. Which factors determines the choice of 9v (close to 10v) operating point? This choice of operating point is much higher than for other similar circuits I will present later. Is it an advantage to have this high operating point for the collector voltage?
The operating point has to be high enough to support the error amplifier and zener reference; they will not operate much lower. It also has to be low enough that Q12B does not saturate. The higher the operating point the higher the value of R29 which contributes to better common mode rejection. Let us see ...
Collector voltage of the error amplifier is 9.0 volts which is 2.8 volts above saturation. Collector voltage of Q12B is 11.2 volts which is 2.8 volts above saturation so there is your answer. They picked an operating point such that the collector-emitter voltages of the error amplifier and Q12B are equally above saturation.
- The Darlington series element for low output impedance and/or not loading the differential pair? Why has the pair so low emitter current? Not to load / change the collector bias point?
My guess is that the tail current of the differential amplifier is low to prevent excessive loading on the output of the error amplifier. The 100 microamp collector current does not allow much.
- What is R26 and C4? Power dissipation and transient response?
R26 is a simple way to add current limiting for a reference supply which is low current anyway.
I am not sure about C4. I doubt transient response is an issue but it could affect stability especially with that Darlington configuration; they are not known for being tame.
Edit: I just dicovered that the calculated nominal collector current through R31 is exactly 100.0 microampere. Is this just a "pretty" choice, or does it have any technical reason?
And the collector current plus 2.9 milliamp zener current add up to 3.0 milliamps. My guess is that the specifications for the zener reference were given at those values but you would need to find the datasheet to know for sure. As I said above, they are not far off from the values Motorola gave for their zener references.