I have witnessed Mobile Radio Audio accessory immunity testing using an acoustic coupling tube. The tube was sealed to the loudspeaker using Blu-tack and the microphone outside the chamber was sealed to the tube (garden hose pipe) again using Blu-tack. I can believe that background noise could be a problem. Could you use an audio spectrum analyzer to just look for the 1 kHz AM breakthrough while rejecting the noise?
Thanks for your response. Actually, what we have are an Ear Simulator (IEC 711) and an Audio Analyzer type 2250. With the Audio Analyzer we can record the signal as a .wav file and I can do post processing to see the frequency response (using pwelch in Octave). We have obtained well results so far.
This is a possible solution but I am not sure whether we leave the Ear Simulator outside the chamber (option 2) or inside the chamber (option 3). Option 1 is the use of the oscilloscope. By the way, the distance from where the EUT will be placed and the boundaries of the chamber is of 5 meters.
I think option 2 is preferable (I have read in some of the standards that this is prescribed) but we have tried with an elastic tube from Fingerlakes (1/8th" I.D. x 3/16" OD x 1/32" Wall) but the attenuation was huge (around 25 dBS at 1kHz and more than 40 dBs for frequencies higher than 3kHz).
Do you know where I could find such tube with almost no attenuation or at least which would be its characteristics to try to find one?
Option 3 is what we are heading now based on the previous results but we would need to place the ear simulator inside the chamber. We would use a cable extender to connect the preamp (which is in the ear sim) and the Audio Analyzer.
Do you think we might pick up a lot of noise in this setup? This is something we can test there but it would be better to know in advance.
Our idea is to play a 1kHz sine wave with the earbuds and see if we get any spurious signal in the audio frequencies which can be perceived by the users.