Thanks awalin I couldn't find Bentley's book, it is very intersting that such a topic doesn't have enough popularity. I am new in experimental science but as I see measurement is the most important part of every thing and noise is the greatest enemy of measurement why is not this popullar.
One issue is that noise is a huge field, and people mean different things by it (one man's noise is another man's signal). You are going to have to find out more specifically what kind of "noise" you have. For instance, the most restrictive definitions of noise include just intrinsic noise sources like johnson noise and shot noise: noise that comes from your sensor or your amplifier. However, that is only a tiny part of things that can make your measurement garbage: you can have interference (EMI), microphonics and triboelectric noise, drift in various parameters such as your transducer coefficient, or true variation in the physical quantity you are measuring. You have to find a different book to learn about each of these! Any book on opamp circuits should cover amplifier noise and source noise. Ott's books talk about EMI and ground loops. The keithley low level measurement handbook covers things like triboelectric noise and thermal EMFs. For problems related to the physics of your measurement system you need a domain specific book. For instance, Hobbs has a smattering of all of the above, plus a ton of stuff about the particulars of electro-optical systems. He also posts on this board from time to time.
My optical researcher friends are using chopper to choppe the light (mostly laser) parallel with lock-in to make the charactarasiton of electro optical devices. I was intereseted in chopping and read a wiki article saying that it is a very old method which is not effective today. I am applying an excitation electrical signal to device and locking in the signal reducing the noise measuring the response. If you have any advise I would like to listen.
Chopping is a great method that is still quite effective today. You just have to understand what it is good for -- primarily eliminating background light (i.e., from room lights), but it also it move your signal frequency up above the 1/f noise corner of your detector. It *does not* do anything to eliminate laser noise, including 1/f intensity noise in your laser, nor does it do anything to eliminate problem with multiple reflections or stray laser light, which are the bane of most optics measurements. In other words, it fixes your detector, not your source. Adding a chopper will not fix a bad experimental design, but it will let a good design run with the lights on. Of course, lock-in techniques are far broader than just choppers, and I will say that a lot of times people use choppers because they haven't tried thinking about a better way. As a general guide, when you want to use a lock-in you want to get as close as possible to modulating the thing you care about. Chopper basically are just a way to modulate the detection. If you can modulate the interaction you are measuring, that is much better.