OK, I looked at some of Dave's videos. He has good info on hardware, but some of his theory is just plain wrong. As an example, his video #748 titled "How Transistors Work" contain lots of errors. He states that a BJT is a current controlled device, and a FET is a voltage controlled device. The fact is, a BJT, FET, and vacuum tube are all transconductance devices, i.e., voltage controls current. I know that is not what a lot of books and magazines aver, but I can back up what I stated. First, I would like to hear some arguments on why so many folks think that the base current controls the collector current of a BJT.
Ratch
Hi,
This has been covered in this forum in a long thread.
The better picture is that the transistor is a voltage controlled device in the STATIC sense only, and since that is usually the de facto standard for determining the basic control scheme it is usually acceptable. When we look at an actual application however we see that there is always a transfer of energy taking place which means current is also involved.
To give an analogy to this way of thinking the water faucet idea is brought up.
When we turn the faucet on, the water flows. We then turn the faucet to the flow of water we desire. We then have the right flow of water so we can say that we 'controlled' the flow of water. So the flow of water has been controlled, and we can say that the flow is controlled by the position of the handle (distance). We can state this two ways:
1. The position controls the water flow.
2. Once we change the position, the water flow is right.
One is a static condition where we assume all the work necessary to achieve the proper outcome has been done, while the other is a dynamic statement about what work has to be done to get the necessary outcome.
So in one case it appears that NO work has to be done in order to get the necessary outcome, while in the other case it is clear that we need to do work to get the proper control.
The static case is often sufficient, but in the case of the transistor it's only in the basic physics sense that voltage control is the basic control scheme. In the electrical sense we can either use voltage control or current control, so stating that voltage control is in effect IN ALL CASES can not be right. In the article maybe a side note would have been a good idea, but in the statement of rejection of such an article a side note should ALSO be included, such as the likes of something like: "current control is also widely used" as a minimum. Stating that it is just plain wrong is just wrong also.
If you still dont agree, ask yourself why anyone would EVER want to use current control if voltage control is the only true standard, and how it could have been used for so many years for so many applications and is still in use today.
In fact, you not only have to ask yourself that question you also have to be able to answer it yourself too.