Author Topic: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs  (Read 4958 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IanBerryTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 17
  • Country: us
Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« on: January 15, 2017, 04:48:20 pm »
So lately I've been looking into RF electronics and I've noticed that many transistors aren't rated for such high frequencies as 100 MHz and ones that are, are rather expensive. I was wondering what actually gave transistors, both MOSFETs and BJTs, their frequency limitations.
 

Offline danmcb

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Country: be
  • if it ain't bust, I didn't test it yet.
    • McBee Audio Labs
Re: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2017, 06:02:36 pm »
junction capacitance, mostly.
 

Online T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21658
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2017, 06:11:09 pm »
Gate or base spreading resistance, and capacitance.

BJTs have a dominant-pole characteristic, with respect to current gain.  Current gain drops to 1 at f_T, but realize it's still possible to have power gain above that frequency: you just need to achieve enough voltage gain as well.  (Real transistors may not be capable of stable operation at enough voltage gain to be worthwhile, even in grounded base operation, because of Cce and Lb.)

The fastest Si BJTs are basically made like any small signal RF type, just "more of it".  At least a few RF transistors throughout history have been, basically, a gazillion 2N3904s, on a single die, wire-bonded in parallel.

MOSFETs have more of a diffusion characteristic, because the gate spreading resistance R_G is distributed along many cells.  Power MOSFETs (most kinds) are optimized for low Rds(on) and switching loss, at the expense of R_G and capacitances.  In particular, capacitance at low Vds is on the "extreme" side.  High voltage SuperJunction types have ~half their drain charge below 20V!  This is good for switching, because more time is spent transitioning through low voltages, keeping losses low.

SuperJunction transistors have conspicuously small feedback capacitance (Crss) at useful drain voltages (>20V), so they might actually be useful.  You don't have nearly the power dissipation capability for a proper RF application, though (example: a 600V, 5A transistor -- that's a 3kW switching SOA -- might dissipate 50W on a cool day).

The 2N7000 is a classic "small signal" transistor.  But it has a HUGE junction.  With almost an ampere of capacity, but a fractional-watt rating, you have to keep voltage or current very low.  Low impedance means more bandwidth, so we choose low voltage and high current.

Typical example:



(2N7002 is the SMT version.)  This is a cascode with 50 ohm input (and a small attempt at matching), 12.5 ohm load (the twisted orange wires go to a transmission line transformer, matching the output into 50 ohms).  Operating at 200mA and 3V per transistor, the -3dB bandwidth is something like 50MHz.  The midband gain is good (I forget what, 18dB or so?), but gain remains modest until quite high frequencies (it's still something like 6dB at 200MHz).

Such a gradual slope is indicative of a diffusion effect, or at most, a single pole.  (But you'd expect a two-pole cutoff (-12dB/oct), from the cutoff of source resistance with gate capacitance, and the load resistance with drain capacitance.)

RF transistors are made with the smallest junction possible, and heavy enough gate metallization to keep going up to much higher frequencies.  Rds(on) is quite high, so they're pretty bad for switching applications, but in a linear amplifier, you don't care about that.

Typical silicon RF MOSFETs run out of steam around 1GHz, with the fastest pushing around 10GHz, and the slowest being suitable for SW and VHF applications (the advantage being, the slow ones use conventional packages like TO-220, and are available in high voltage ratings).  Still higher frequencies are handled with other semiconductors (SiGe:C, GaAs and GaN being the most important).

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 

Offline danadak

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1875
  • Country: us
  • Reactor Operator SSN-583, Retired EE
Love Cypress PSOC, ATTiny, Bit Slice, OpAmps, Oscilloscopes, and Analog Gurus like Pease, Miller, Widlar, Dobkin, obsessed with being an engineer
 

Offline IanBerryTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 17
  • Country: us
Re: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2017, 10:46:14 pm »
So, are there any MOSFETs out there that are almost the FET equivalent of the 2n3904/2n3906? Have positive gain at 100MHz, small signal, small profile, cheap.
 

Online T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21658
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2017, 08:45:18 am »
So, you want jellybeans?

2N7000 (2N7002 SMT), BSS138, RUM001L02, etc. (N channel)
BSS84, etc. (P channel)

Like I said, 2N7000 has useful gain at 100MHz, but it takes quite low impedances and high currents to realize.  It's not really an RF part.

Small signal RF MOSFETs aren't really a jellybean thing, though they're out there.  JFETs, too.

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 

Offline danadak

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1875
  • Country: us
  • Reactor Operator SSN-583, Retired EE
Re: Frequency Limitations of MOSFETs and BJTs
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2017, 12:20:27 pm »
What are the actual requirements ?

Gain =
Noise =
Bandwidth =
Power out=
Zin, Zout =
Power Supply =
Power consumption =
Cost =
Package =

Regards, Dana.
Love Cypress PSOC, ATTiny, Bit Slice, OpAmps, Oscilloscopes, and Analog Gurus like Pease, Miller, Widlar, Dobkin, obsessed with being an engineer
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf