Hello,
I am in the early stages of designing a lab PSU (for fun) and am presently trying to work out how to make a voltage regulator. I am testing out the transient recovery (see other thread
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/linear-psu-transient-recovery-response/) and don't like what I am seeing.
The PSU output will be variable between 0-15V @ 5A and 15 - 30V @ 3A. The PSU will run @50Hz. I am planning on building a pre-regulator also but haven't done that yet. It will eventually have current limiting but I haven't done that either.
I am using an N-channel MOSFET and I am using a voltage doubler to generate the gate drive voltage.
In my model I have a load switching from 0 - 3A and back to 0 with some lead inductance between the PSU and the load. I find that when the load increases, the transient recovery is pretty good (110mV droop and totally recovers within 150uS). When the load drops though, while the overshoot is not too big (80mV) it then undershoots again and then takes a while to recover. At higher currents it is worse. The reaction seems the same at different output voltages.
The load drop reaction seems to be when the error amplifier tries to drive the gate to zero. In the load step-up case it just neatly increases the voltage with no overshoot.
I experimented for a while with different MOSFETs, and different op amps. I also experimented with using an NPN and PNP transistor to control the gate voltage using a lower voltage (so I could then use a lower voltage op amp and so I would have less hassles with slew rate) but I couldn't get this stable. Probably because I couldn't get the NPN/PNP combination linear enough I think.
I tried a couple of op amps capable of 44V supply rail operation but the LT1639 seems preferable as it has faster slew rate.
I found using an emitter follower to drive the gate worked better as I think it provides more current. I probably have to pick a better transistor...
How can I make the response better? i.e. quicker and with less overshoot. See LTSPICE file and circuit diagrams attached.
Or is this Ok for a general purpose (relatively precision) PSU?
Thanks,
Tom