Author Topic: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289  (Read 3486 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PlatformsTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: ca
Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« on: July 20, 2017, 12:05:40 pm »
OK. currently I need to buy a multi-meter, and these 2 basically are in my mind.

Question 1. They keep claiming that you can measure Amperage at the same time while you are measuring voltage.
How can they make this happen? From my understanding, if you don't run the meter serial with the wire, you can't get the amp number at all....

Question 2. Do Fluke 289 have that Smart Ohm function? Or offset compensating like the U1272A?
Do Fluke 289 be able to calculate the wire length at the low 50Ohm range?

Question 3. For the nS mode, what is the lowest & highest resolution which Fluke 289 can go up to?

Question 4. For the software, anyone know any alternatives to use this function without buying the Fluke unit? Basically this is one of the biggest killer for me. I can't believe the unit & software is like 250$, 1/3 of the meter price. on the other hand, Keysight only want 40$. and free software. Very reasonable.

For those of you who own either one, how do you like them?

Specially the Fluke guys, do the 289 chew batteries like no tomorrow or you can still get some reasonable battery time? And let say if you are @ Ohm mode and "accidentally" poke a 600V outlet. what message will the fluke shows?

 

Offline mahi

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Country: 00
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2017, 03:29:25 pm »
Question 1. They keep claiming that you can measure Amperage at the same time while you are measuring voltage.
How can they make this happen? From my understanding, if you don't run the meter serial with the wire, you can't get the amp number at all....

Who's claiming that? Some meters, like Dave's upcoming 121GW, support power measurement (simultaneous measurement of voltage and current) but the Fluke 289 definitely does not. Fluke does not advertise that anywhere. I'm not familiar with the Keysight U1272A but since the datasheet nowhere mentions this feature it's quite safe to assume it does not either.

Quote
Question 2. Do Fluke 289 have that Smart Ohm function?

No. At least not that I know of.

Quote
Or offset compensating like the U1272A?

You mean relative (delta) mode? Yes.

Quote
Do Fluke 289 be able to calculate the wire length at the low 50Ohm range?

No. No multimeter would be able to do this unless it "magically" knows the wire gauge and resistivity.

Quote
Question 3. For the nS mode, what is the lowest & highest resolution which Fluke 289 can go up to?

It measures up to 50 nS with a 0.01 nS resolution.

Quote
Question 4. For the software, anyone know any alternatives to use this function without buying the Fluke unit? Basically this is one of the biggest killer for me. I can't believe the unit & software is like 250$, 1/3 of the meter price. on the other hand, Keysight only want 40$. and free software. Very reasonable.

The Fluke 289 is supported in Sigrok and LabVIEW. You'd still need the adapter cable although you can build your own for much less than Fluke is charging.

Quote
For those of you who own either one, how do you like them?

The Fluke 289 is probably my favorite meter but it's not without its flaws: It's slow to start up (~8 seconds), could use a higher contrast display, the menu system is not always intuitive, you can't view the trend while logging, it's fairly bulky and it suffers from a leaking supercap issue (see below). Then again it makes up for a lot of that with excellent accuracy and some clever features.

Quote
Specially the Fluke guys, do the 289 chew batteries like no tomorrow or you can still get some reasonable battery time?

Battery life is stated as 100 hours. That's about 1/3th of the U1272A. I never found it much of an issue. Note that the 289 is plagued by a leaking supercap issue which dramatically reduces battery life. I think most of the horrid battery life reports are due to that issue. Fluke changed the supercap for a rechargeable battery in the current version which supposedly fixes the issue. If you have/get an older one you can have it serviced by Fluke or (if you don't care about warranty) replace the supercap yourself.

Quote
And let say if you are @ Ohm mode and "accidentally" poke a 600V outlet. what message will the fluke shows?

I have no idea what would be displayed but the millivolt, ohm, diode and capacitance ranges are protected up to 1000 V.
 
The following users thanked this post: Platforms

Offline RoadRunner

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 378
  • Country: de
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2017, 04:07:24 pm »

Question 4. For the software, anyone know any alternatives to use this function without buying the Fluke unit? Basically this is one of the biggest killer for me. I can't believe the unit & software is like 250$, 1/3 of the meter price. on the other hand, Keysight only want 40$. and free software. Very reasonable.

For those of you who own either one, how do you like them?


I own U1272A and i have used fluke 289 at place of work. 289 is more focused on logging , it is a big heavy thing , i feel U1272A is more focus on normal use , you can do logging though.  It is lighter than fluke 289 .

buying software is pain. so i have written  python scripts to get data out of the FLUKE 289,
here is the document i refered to.
www.labviewpro.net/upfiles/remote_spec28X.doc
 
The following users thanked this post: Platforms

Offline PlatformsTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: ca
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2017, 06:57:51 am »
Question 1. They keep claiming that you can measure Amperage at the same time while you are measuring voltage.
How can they make this happen? From my understanding, if you don't run the meter serial with the wire, you can't get the amp number at all....

Who's claiming that? Some meters, like Dave's upcoming 121GW, support power measurement (simultaneous measurement of voltage and current) but the Fluke 289 definitely does not. Fluke does not advertise that anywhere. I'm not familiar with the Keysight U1272A but since the datasheet nowhere mentions this feature it's quite safe to assume it does not either.

Yea, that's 1 thing which I keep researching. 1 side, seems like some meter can do that, but on the other hand, it just completely reverse the theory why there is clamp meter for today.

Basically same as Gossen Metrawatt Metrahit Energy multimeter, they claim that too, but when I call their tech support, he basically said that I need to buy a adapter to install it in-between the unit. (From my understanding, same as before, must be serial)

For Dave's 121GW meter, do you know where can I get some more info of the spec?

Quote
Question 3. For the nS mode, what is the lowest & highest resolution which Fluke 289 can go up to?

It measures up to 50 nS with a 0.01 nS resolution.

What is the different in-between Ohm & nS mode anyways? From what I understand, Ohm apply low voltage to do the measurement already. It's not like Insulation meter, apply high voltage to test resistance......


Quote
For those of you who own either one, how do you like them?

The Fluke 289 is probably my favorite meter but it's not without its flaws: It's slow to start up (~8 seconds), could use a higher contrast display, the menu system is not always intuitive, you can't view the trend while logging, it's fairly bulky and it suffers from a leaking supercap issue (see below). Then again it makes up for a lot of that with excellent accuracy and some clever features.

Like what kind of clever features does it have? Any specific function which basically save your life or save you a ton of time to do the troubleshoot? (I keep looking thru the menu from fluke online, but I only find out a bunch of basic manuals.....)
 

Offline PlatformsTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: ca
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2017, 07:12:35 am »

Question 4. For the software, anyone know any alternatives to use this function without buying the Fluke unit? Basically this is one of the biggest killer for me. I can't believe the unit & software is like 250$, 1/3 of the meter price. on the other hand, Keysight only want 40$. and free software. Very reasonable.

For those of you who own either one, how do you like them?


I own U1272A and i have used fluke 289 at place of work. 289 is more focused on logging , it is a big heavy thing , i feel U1272A is more focus on normal use , you can do logging though.  It is lighter than fluke 289 .

buying software is pain. so i have written  python scripts to get data out of the FLUKE 289,
here is the document i refered to.
www.labviewpro.net/upfiles/remote_spec28X.doc

That's what I figure out from how they promote their meters too, but so far, how can you remember all those functions on the u1272a? ex. if you need to use 1 of those functions, and you forgot how to pull that out, usually how you solve it? so far, I can see this meter have lots of functions, but..... setting them up seems to get quite complex. not as simple as fluke....

How buggy is the firmware on this unit anyways? Personally I like the U1272A more, but in Canada, almost no one heard of it...... and most of the review online on this meter is like 3year plus.... kind of outdated.....
 

Offline PlatformsTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: ca
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2017, 07:51:50 am »
I own an F289 and an U1461A. The U1461A is effectively U1272A with OLED, extended temperature and 1.1kV insulation test mode, and unfortunately, lower accuracy (maybe due to wider rated temperature range).

The F289 has very acceptable battery life, so does the U1461A. Both are considerably shorter than a normal LCD DMM, but still long enough to not to worry in everyday use.

F289 has leaky supercap, which plagues almost every F289 unit. Some only leak some organic electrolyte and doesn't matter in a long run, just battery time backup time goes shorter. Some severe cases the leaky supercap will drain the main battery.

F289 has rather long boot up time. If you prefer to turn it off after each measurement, it will be annoying. U1461A boots faster, but still not comparable with F87V.

F289 firmware is essentially bug free, while U1461A has more bugs than what can annoy me. But usually those bugs are not safety related. It's just MCU having a brain fart, and a reboot takes care of them.

For an everyday DMM, I choose F289 over U1461A. I bought U1461A only because I wanted to have (crude) HV testing capability without having to buy a $7000 SMU (Keithley 2410).

HV testing.... you mean High Voltage or.....

For my situation, I own a T5-1000, and a Megger MIT 420. Currently I need something which can measure electronics (something more accurate than my T5), logging function is good, but I only need like 10min max (so I know Fluke 289 is completely overkill) what more important for the logging part is how many time per sec.

(I work in a food processing plant, so lots of heaters, steam cookers, motors, and electronics to control valves)

Currently I have a few meters in my mind.
Keysight U1272A
Pro: Lots of features, "Sounds" WAY more refine than a F87V, have even more functions than F289, but can be gimmick stuff 
Cons: Seems super buggy, and not too much support in Canada
Currently, still waiting for them to answer me that do their 4-20mA function. Can it source or simulate.....

Fluke 289
Pro: Fluke stable, and problem free
Cons: seems less function or less may be less gimmick than U1272a. Price is quite hi, almost not worth that price

Fluke 87V
Pro: Fluke stable, and problem free
Cons: really outdated in my opinion.

Fluke 279 (The one with thermal camera)
Pro: Fluke stable, can record those video or images
Cons: thermal camera not as good as flir DM284, measure part seems to be worst than F87V
still waiting for Fluke tech support to give me the spec of the meter

Gossen Metrawatt Metrahit Energy multimeter
Pro: German quality, and basically I have an energy meter
Cons: not too much detail or support in Canada (Even worst than Keysight) and *just find out you need to hook it serial to the unit to do the energy measurement ( can be wrong since lack info on this unit)

Flir DM284
Pro: Very good thermal image part. Meter have most of the function which I want.
Cons: meter part made by extech. quality may be not too great. Their tech support don't like to pick up the phone to reply back.
Currently still getting more detail on the unit

Dave's 112GW (still no idea what to expect from this unit)
Hoping that it have those sweet function of a Keysight 1272A & Gossen Metrawatt Metrahit Energy multimeter
Who got more detail on this unit, please let me know
 

Offline alm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2840
  • Country: 00
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2017, 08:10:43 am »
Quote
Question 3. For the nS mode, what is the lowest & highest resolution which Fluke 289 can go up to?

It measures up to 50 nS with a 0.01 nS resolution.

What is the different in-between Ohm & nS mode anyways? From what I understand, Ohm apply low voltage to do the measurement already. It's not like Insulation meter, apply high voltage to test resistance......
The test voltage is the same low voltage, but 0.01 nS resolution is equivalent to 0.1 TOhm (of course accuracy will not be amazing and noise may be a problem). That is much higher than you would be able to measure in Ohms mode. So it is basically a high resistance mode. Resistance mode from 1 mOhm to 500 MOhm, conductance from 20 MOhm to 0.1 TOhm. Neither would be suitable as insulation test, since that would have to be performed at much higher voltages.
 
The following users thanked this post: Platforms

Offline mahi

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Country: 00
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2017, 09:25:27 am »
Yea, that's 1 thing which I keep researching. 1 side, seems like some meter can do that, but on the other hand, it just completely reverse the theory why there is clamp meter for today.

Clamp meters simply use a different technology to measure current - it has nothing to do with a meter's ability to measure "power". Most multimeters use a shunt resistor to measure current. Clamp meters on the other hand measure the magnetic field induced by the current in the wire. The major advantage of clamp meters is that they allow contact-less current measurements without interrupting the circuit. That's much safer than a shunt resistors in a high energy environment. The disadvantage of clamp meters is lower accuracy - especially at lower currents.

Power measurement requires a multimeter that can do simultaneous voltage and current measurements (whether that's from a shunt resistor or a current clamp is irrelevant).

Quote
For Dave's 121GW meter, do you know where can I get some more info of the spec?

The 121GW is still in pre-production phase. As far as I know no final specs, nor user manual has been released yet. However, fellow board member joeqsmith received a pre-production model from Dave for some early impressions/testing (note the multimeter was uncalibrated with unfinished/buggy firmware). He made a video about power measurements you may want to check out (link).

Basically the meter is put in series with the load to measure current, but at the same time a third lead is used to measure the voltage over the load.

Quote
What is the different in-between Ohm & nS mode anyways? From what I understand, Ohm apply low voltage to do the measurement already. It's not like Insulation meter, apply high voltage to test resistance......

The nS mode on the Fluke 289 is just to measure extremely high resistances. You should not confuse this with an insulation tester which is used to detect insulation breakdown at (typically) high voltages. Compare it to measuring the resistance of your body with a regular multimeter and holding a probe in each hand. You will read very high resistance. This may lead you to the misunderstanding that your body is a quite decent electrical insulator (see thread Why'd i get shocked by wall outlet?). Higher voltages can break down the insulation of your skin. That does not make the multimeter's readings wrong - they are just not applicable for when you'd touch mains voltage...

Quote
Like what kind of clever features does it have? Any specific function which basically save your life or save you a ton of time to do the troubleshoot? (I keep looking thru the menu from fluke online, but I only find out a bunch of basic manuals.....)

It's not like these features are not found on other meters, especially the higher-end models you are looking at, but they are implemented very well in the Fluke 289. Some of the things I like:
  • Min-Max mode: Naturally min-max mode is not unique to the Fluke 289 but the large graphical display allows the current, maximum, average and minimum values to be displayed all on a single screen instead of having to toggle between each of them. Even better is that the minimum and maximum values have timestamps.
  • Inverse continuity mode: Usually continuity mode is used as short circuit detection (beeps when the measured resistance is below a certain threshold). The 289, however, has a mode to detect open circuit. In other words, it beeps only when the circuit goes open. This is great to find cold/bad solder joints, bad contact in wiring,... (the U1272A can do this as well I noticed after reading the user manual)
  • Relative measurement in %: Great to test tolerances.
  • Trend logging: Obviously you can do trend logging with any multimeter that has PC connectivity but I like being able to log and view data without having to set up a computer next to it. I guess this will get less and less relevant with more and more meters supporting Bluetooth and compact smartphones replacing laptops for this purpose. However that still requires the smartphone to stay near the meter (Bluetooth range). A self-contained meter like the 289 can just log on its own.
I had a quick look at the U1272A manual and it too has some nice features I wish the 289 had: Auto-diode test (the older Fluke 760 series had it, so why can't the current flagship do it?) and especially scale transfers (I really miss this on the 289 when using current clamps).

Quote
logging function is good, but I only need like 10min max (so I know Fluke 289 is completely overkill) what more important for the logging part is how many time per sec

The shortest interval is 1 sample per second but it can detect and record events within the interval (so glitches can be detected and logged even though they may not have occurred exactly at the interval).
« Last Edit: July 24, 2017, 07:34:31 am by mahi »
 
The following users thanked this post: Platforms

Offline mahi

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Country: 00
Re: Need to advice/help on Keysight U1272A & FLuke 289
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2017, 09:36:54 am »
Gossen Metrawatt Metrahit Energy multimeter
Pro: German quality, and basically I have an energy meter
Cons: not too much detail or support in Canada (Even worst than Keysight) and *just find out you need to hook it serial to the unit to do the energy measurement ( can be wrong since lack info on this unit)

Just download the user's manual and take a look at chapter 5.7. There are diagrams in that chapter showing the various ways to measure power with the Metrahit Energy.
 
The following users thanked this post: Platforms


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf