Author Topic: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?  (Read 17930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1314
  • Country: us
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2012, 05:54:41 pm »
Thanks for the video, Dave.  Quite sobering.  I'm now wondering if I've done some stupid things with my scope.
 

alm

  • Guest
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2012, 06:35:25 pm »
There is nothing wrong with using an iso transformer PROVIDED YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
People who knew what they were doing have been killed doing exactly this. Granted, this was with the big clunky analog scopes with much more exposed metal, but they had actually built a plastic enclosure for the scope for insulation. An engineer screwed up and electrocuted himself.

There are even fully isolated bnc cables and probes for such circumstances.
These are designed to work with isolated BNC connectors, as found on the Fluke Scopemeters and Tek scopes with floating channels. Not much point using with metal BNC connectors and thin plastic knobs that are not designed to protect the user from dangerous voltages.

  There simply are situations where you can't go without. Take an H bridge in a motor drive: 400 volts dc( im talking frequency drive ).
Your task is to visualize the gate drive voltage of the top transistor.... You cant do it because the scope does not have enough dynamic range to show a 2 volt signal superimposed on a 400 volt offset.
The solution ? There are two : use a high voltage differential probe or float the scope...
Yes, this is a hard problem. The slew rate of many differential probes may also be too low. Capacitance to ground will be an issue for a floating scope. It won't have any guarding if it's designed to be grounded. Still, even if you as an experienced engineer decide that floating the scope is the only solution and take precautions to reduce the risk, then it's not a good idea to suggest the same to unexperienced hobbyists.

Are you able to pull this off without having the OSHA people scream at you?

USB isolators are not that rare. analog devices has a single chip one . little 14 pin thing. I used one a couple of weeks ago on a design i'm working on....
Maybe an idea for a product to add to the eevblog store. I can send you the layout and schematic for it.
Yes, these work fine (I don't have the p/n memorized, but searching for iCoupler should find it). I would put such a circuit in an enclosure for obvious reasons if you're using it with high(ish) voltages (> SELV). I believe there are two second source manufacturers, but I keep forgetting their name. These are all limited to USB 1.1 or USB 2.0 full speed, last time I checked. USB 2.0 high speed is much less common and probably much more expensive.
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7586
  • Country: au
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2012, 02:43:07 am »
There is nothing wrong with using an iso transformer PROVIDED YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.

There are even fully isolated bnc cables and probes for such circumstances.  There simply are situations where you can't go without. Take an H bridge in a motor drive: 400 volts dc( I'm talking frequency drive ).
Your task is to visualize the gate drive voltage of the top transistor.... You cant do it because the scope does not have enough dynamic range to show a 2 volt signal superimposed on a 400 volt offset.
The solution ? There are two : use a high voltage differential probe or float the scope...

Tektronix makes a scope that has separated and isolated inputs. 4 channels. The input bnc is not connected to chassis ground. Each input channel has its own psu digitzer and memory and communicates over an optolink with the main processor.

Back in the day,Tektronix made plugins for the 545,etc,which had an offset control,so you could look at quite small signals superimposed on,from memory,up to around 400 volts dc.
This was a much more common requirement in the days of tube equipment,when anode voltages were anything from 200 volts upward,depending upon the application.
I assume this would work in the application you referred to.
It is a shame that they have stopped making things like that,although the special isolated design you described does the same job.

What I can't quite understand is the OP's requirement for a floating device for automotive use.
All the automotive waveforms I have ever seen were expressed  w.r.t. the car chassis.
It is fairly easy--if you stick your earth clip on a car body,engine block,etc.you can use the probe to look at waveforms with no chance of damage to your 'scope.
In any case,most circuitry in cars is protected by fuses,so you will probably blow the fuse & protect the 'scope.
Even if you are careless enough to put the earth lead on the "hot" side,the 'scope body still has to be touching the chassis to cause problems---stick a newspaper under it,& you have a "floating" instrument as far as the car supply knows.
Under normal conditions the car "earth" & the mains earth have no connection.*

Looking at mains voltages direct is another story altogether,& special precautions need to be taken.

*If you are running your Oscilloscope off the battery,using an inverter which connects  the earth pin of the output socket back to the car chassis,(which is fairly uncommon) the 'scope body will be at the same potential as the car body/chassis,so it would be important to get the probe earth lead & probe tip the right way around.
If you have a DMM,you can check this at the outset.
If you are paranoid,you can also use the DMM to check any points you wish to probe with your 'scope,
« Last Edit: May 17, 2012, 03:12:21 am by vk6zgo »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37738
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2012, 03:11:33 am »
USB isolators are not that rare. analog devices has a single chip one . little 14 pin thing. I used one a couple of weeks ago on a design i'm working on....
Maybe an idea for a product to add to the eevblog store. I can send you the layout and schematic for it.

That's actually been on the to-to list a long time...

Dave.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37738
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #29 on: May 17, 2012, 03:15:52 am »
So you really think that the probe ground lead would blow before a PCB trace on the scope does?

The BNC is usually bolted directly to the chassis which has a proper big hunking 1sqmm short cable to the IEC connector earth pin. Teardowns like my Agilent one should show this.
I've seen scope ground leads vaporise!

Dave.
 

Offline amspire

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3802
  • Country: au
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #30 on: May 17, 2012, 03:45:40 am »
  There simply are situations where you can't go without. Take an H bridge in a motor drive: 400 volts dc( im talking frequency drive ).
Your task is to visualize the gate drive voltage of the top transistor.... You cant do it because the scope does not have enough dynamic range to show a 2 volt signal superimposed on a 400 volt offset.
The solution ? There are two : use a high voltage differential probe or float the scope...

I would not try and float a mains powered scope to solve this.

High quality current probes are brilliant, and if you know the circuit, you can often work out what is happening via the current waveforms only. I have also used a current probe to measure voltage by adding a resistor across the switching circuit and measure the current through the resistor. There are issues with this method. Otherwise you have differential probes or battery powered scopes.

The problem with floating a mains powered the scope is if you connect a floating scope to a circuit with the kind of slew rates you can get with MOSFET switching circuits, you can easily get current pulses through the scope supply circuit via the transformer capacitance of hundreds of amps peak. These are currents the scopes were never designed for. Even if the scope survives, the spurious waveforms near the switching point will be very misleading. Just as an example, say if you have  rectified 240VAC which is 336V switched in in 20nS and you attach a scope earth that has 25pF transformer capacitance to the mains. That calculates out to be 420A peak current going through the scope circuitry.

The Australian-made BWD Powerscopes did solve this problem brilliantly with four 600V differential channels if you can live with the 50nS rise time.

Richard.
 

Offline pickle9000

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2439
  • Country: ca
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2012, 03:47:28 am »
The early TDS 210's had an undersized grounding strap on the chassis. They found out about it after it was in service (and melted down) and had a recall on them. Of course they found out the hard way and there was no indication on the scope that it had failed. Could have been a big problem.

...mike
 

Offline DJKA

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: lt
    • PlusFM!
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2012, 07:42:58 am »
OK, so what about connecting the ground clip via some fuse like 200mA? If something goes wrong the circuit and/or scope will not be hurt...
« Last Edit: May 17, 2012, 07:45:38 am by DJKA »
--
DJKA
 

Offline Bored@Work

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3932
  • Country: 00
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2012, 08:07:39 am »
OK, so what about connecting the ground clip via some fuse like 200mA? If something goes wrong the circuit and/or scope will not be hurt...

200 mA is still enough to kill you. 200 mA the wrong way is also enough to kill a lot of circuits. And it ruins high frequency measurements.
I delete PMs unread. If you have something to say, say it in public.
For all else: Profile->[Modify Profile]Buddies/Ignore List->Edit Ignore List
 

Offline DJKA

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: lt
    • PlusFM!
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2012, 08:24:10 am »
How should the fuse ruin HF measurements? Please explain me as for a beginner. Although I've never had a scope before on my hands, I presume that the ground lead is a simple piece of wire, so is the fuse(a thin wire made of lead). What about say 10mA fuse?

OK, so what about connecting the ground clip via some fuse like 200mA? If something goes wrong the circuit and/or scope will not be hurt...

200 mA is still enough to kill you. 200 mA the wrong way is also enough to kill a lot of circuits. And it ruins high frequency measurements.
--
DJKA
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8517
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2012, 02:44:48 pm »
USB isolators are not that rare. analog devices has a single chip one . little 14 pin thing. I used one a couple of weeks ago on a design i'm working on....
Maybe an idea for a product to add to the eevblog store. I can send you the layout and schematic for it.

That's actually been on the to-to list a long time...

Dave.
Right, expect mail... Altium pcbprj ok ?
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 

Offline T4P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3697
  • Country: sg
    • T4P
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2012, 05:37:36 pm »
How should the fuse ruin HF measurements? Please explain me as for a beginner. Although I've never had a scope before on my hands, I presume that the ground lead is a simple piece of wire, so is the fuse(a thin wire made of lead). What about say 10mA fuse?

OK, so what about connecting the ground clip via some fuse like 200mA? If something goes wrong the circuit and/or scope will not be hurt...

200 mA is still enough to kill you. 200 mA the wrong way is also enough to kill a lot of circuits. And it ruins high frequency measurements.

A fuse forms a RC filter with the scope .
 

Offline G7PSK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3861
  • Country: gb
  • It is hot until proved not.
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #37 on: May 17, 2012, 08:29:10 pm »
What would be the situation if an elcb plug was used on the oscilloscope if you got the connection on the probe wrong it would be see as an earth fault and trip the breaker which normally are around 30ma.
 

Offline T4P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3697
  • Country: sg
    • T4P
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #38 on: May 17, 2012, 09:12:11 pm »
What would be the situation if an elcb plug was used on the oscilloscope if you got the connection on the probe wrong it would be see as an earth fault and trip the breaker which normally are around 30ma.

ELCBs introduce additional resistance and an additional point of failure into the earthing system. < Taken from wiki, unless it's an RCD which is a detector of imbalance which wouldn't work either.
 

Offline bruce273

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 39
  • Country: gb
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #39 on: May 17, 2012, 10:48:53 pm »
This may be unrelated but from the video if a scope's mains ground was tied to neutral on the secondary side of the transformer and the circuit to be probed for some reason, like the plug was incorrectly wired, couldn't that cause a mains short through your probe? Also isn't this method of wiring often illegal, at least in Europe, or is that when the primary side is tied to ground?
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7586
  • Country: au
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #40 on: May 18, 2012, 06:31:51 am »
What would be the situation if an elcb plug was used on the oscilloscope if you got the connection on the probe wrong it would be see as an earth fault and trip the breaker which normally are around 30ma.

ELCBs introduce additional resistance and an additional point of failure into the earthing system. < Taken from wiki, unless it's an RCD which is a detector of imbalance which wouldn't work either.

Actually,RCDs do work!---In the mains case,& when both  the 'scope & the DUT are fed from the same RCD.

Back in the day when I was fixing a lot of things which needed isolation transformers,I got caught out one day,& plugged the DUT directly into the mains ,with the 'scope probe across the the 240v input to the switchmode-.
Yes,it wasn't my day------the earth clip lead was on the active side.
Zap!! followed by the desk RCD dropping out for my bench & the one in the next room.
Much good natured ribbing ensued!

The thing could have dropped out due to a current overload,as it incorporated that as well,but the RCD is usually much faster in operation.
The two benches were regarded as one device,as far as the RCD was concerned,so there would have definitely been an unbalance in this case.
It would be fairly unusual in a bench situation for the DUT & the 'scope to be  fed from different RCDs.

The first time I encountered an RCD,I was working on a piece of equipment,& wished to check for presence of mains.
Being a bit lazy,& because the neutral was a bit hard to get at,I hung the AVO8 between active & the earthed chassis.
Something went clunk! & the mains disappeared leaving me mystified,till I discovered that the "Sparkies" in my absence, had fitted the RCD.

So there's something interesting,an analog VOM draws enough current to unbalance an RCD & drop it out.
A DMM,or "scope won't,so for a quick check for the presence of mains,you can measure between active & earth.(With in the 'scope case,your probe earth clip firmly attached to a point connected to the mains earth .)

 

Offline T4P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3697
  • Country: sg
    • T4P
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #41 on: May 18, 2012, 06:49:56 am »
Alright thanks. Looks like the same RCD on the bench is the answer, anyways, my house's ELCB is getting pretty slow already to the point that the huge 100amp breaker outside will trip before the ELCB.
 

Offline CampKohler

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 17
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #42 on: May 31, 2012, 02:03:51 am »
Dave just made a very detailed video on scope grounding: . Read the comments, too.
 

Offline george gravesTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1257
  • Country: us
Re: Safeguards to preventing damage to a scope?
« Reply #43 on: May 31, 2012, 11:25:30 am »
 8)  Hehhe- ya don't say!  Yes, he made the video in response to my question(this post).  Heheheh -I'm the "young player" he mentions.   
« Last Edit: May 31, 2012, 11:29:14 am by george graves »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf