Hello,
I guess that most of you will agree that for in-circuit electrolitic cap testing and low experience, an ESR value is an "idiot proof" method, but at the moment I don't own an (expensive) ESR meter.
I've read that ESR measurement involves injecting a low voltage (like 10mVpp) square wave at a low frequency (1/10KHz) on a lead of the cap to test, read the output in the other lead and finally do some math.
Hmmm... so, basically, with a function gen and a dso I should be able to collect some (raw) values as a waveforms!
As I guessed over the Internet there are people that reports simple methods to test in-circuit polarized caps, all of them involves frequency injection and probing (
almost the same physical principle than the commercial ESR meters uses): inject a few KHz and low mV square waveform (some suggest to use a resistor first) in one lead of the cap to test, and then probe the other lead with a dso. The waveform should change in some way relatively to ESR value of the cap tested. More ESR, more changes.
It is not an "monkey proof" numerical value but should do the trick.So simple?: just take some good caps, put them one at time in between the fgen and dso and then learn their characteristic "reference" waveform. Then test a suspect cap and see any difference in the dso readings. Fantastic!
Like a curve tracer!But it doesn't work.
I've tried various caps of different values using different voltages and frequencies, injecting the signal with a shielded RG58 coax cable and a grabber connector at one lead and a 1X/10X probe with a hook on the other, adjusting properly time scale and sensitivity to have only one duty cycle on the screen, but the waveforms I get are identical, both with the cap in between the signal and dso and without it (with a metal jumper).
No ringing, no under/overshoot, just the same squarewave. There is something I'm doing wrong, that's for sure.
I'm done and I must buy an ESR meter?
Help me to save money