Author Topic: What cause the power difference among different wireless mode / rate?  (Read 1547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sam1275Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 401
  • Country: us
Hi everyone.
I noticed that in some high power wireless network devices, the higher speed it working, the less tx power / rx sensitivity it will be, a sample from a data sheet:

Transmitter Power:
802.11b: 28 ± 1.5 dBm
802.11g: 23 ± 1.5 dBm
802.11n: 23 ± 1.5 dBm
Receive Sensitivity:
-73 dBm @ 802.11n
-76 dBm @ 54Mbps
-91 dBm @ 11Mbps
-95 dBm @ 1 Mbps

Why is this?
Thank you.
 

Offline ConKbot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1383
IIRC, 802.11b has a lower peak to average power ratio (PAPR) than a/g/n because it uses a different encoding. Since the amplifiers peak power is fixed, that means the average TX power ( the spec shown) can be higher for 802.11b.

As far as the recieve side I cant give an authoritative response either, but generally, as your bandwidth of your receiver increases, so does the noise power, which decreases sensitivity. Also, with a encoding that does more bits per symbol, your SNR requirements increase. With an equivalent receiver, your "energy per bit" stays the same, so higher bit rate, higher energy put into the RX required.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eb/N0 
 

Offline sam1275Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 401
  • Country: us
IIRC, 802.11b has a lower peak to average power ratio (PAPR) than a/g/n because it uses a different encoding. Since the amplifiers peak power is fixed, that means the average TX power ( the spec shown) can be higher for 802.11b.

As far as the recieve side I cant give an authoritative response either, but generally, as your bandwidth of your receiver increases, so does the noise power, which decreases sensitivity. Also, with a encoding that does more bits per symbol, your SNR requirements increase. With an equivalent receiver, your "energy per bit" stays the same, so higher bit rate, higher energy put into the RX required.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eb/N0
Wow, great explanation, I think that make sense, thank you very much.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf