What the heck is voltage, anyway?

[CharlieWorton]

Hi, all... I'm enrolled in a distance education electronics course, and I'm right back at the starting gate.

Amps, I've got figured out.  1 coulomb of electrons is 6.24*10^18 electrons.  That many electrons moving past a point in one second is one amp.  So I think I've got that one sorted.  Similarly, Ohms is resistance... the more ohms, the more resistance, the fewer electrons make it through.

But volts... that one just isn't jelling for me.  My texts are telling me that it is 'energy' or 'potential'.  But that's not helping me understand it.  If electrons all have the same energy, then the only way to increase the rate of energy delivery is to increase the number of electrons moving past a point... which means raising the amps.  I'm kinda visualizing the finish line at a racetrack.  As a few electrons pass the finish line, we have a low amp rate.  As more electrons pass the line, we have a higher amp rate.  And really, that ought to be the end of the story.  The only parameters there are amps - the number of electrons passing the finish line - and resistance, which I guess would be the width of the track.

I don't see how volts even figure into that picture.

Can anyone help me get a clearer picture of this?

Thanks - Charlie

[IanB]

Voltage is pressure. Force. Tension.

In the old days, people called voltage "electrical pressure". High voltage supplies were called "high tension supplies".

The electrons don't move unless you force them, push them along. Voltage is what does the pushing.

[rstofer]

I'm not fond of the water analogy and it breaks down pretty quick but here it is:

Volts is the pressure kicking the electrons through the resistance.  Like water pressure in that, for a given hose length and diameter (resistance), the only way to get more water out is to increase the pressure (volts).

But volts has to be a potential difference, not some absolute value.  If you consider a hose coming down the mountain, the pressure at the bottom is related to the difference in the water level in the hose.  But it is also the pressure difference taken at a couple of points somewhere along the hose, not necessarily the top and bottom.

So, for now, just consider voltage to be a potential difference between any two arbitrary points and move along.

Ohm's Law really tells you everything you need to know:  Voltage = Current * Resistance : E=I*R

ETA

Siince you have no problem visualizing current flow then rearrange the equation as Current = Voltage / Resistance.  As the voltage increases, the current increases.  As the resistance decreases, current increases.  Both of these make sense intuitively.

But the trick is to remember that voltage is always a DIFFERENCE in potential between two points.  This will be important when you get to Kirchoff's Laws.

[Sweeney]

I like the analogy.

The question is how would you "just raise the amps" in your picture? Or in other words: Why would the electrons move in the first place and not just be stationary? To go with your picture, it's the voltage that's motivating the electrons to move in the first place. If you wanted for more electrons to cross the finish line in your analogy, you could either widen the track (reduce resistance) or push the little electrons harder (increase the voltage).

[IanB]

The question is how would you "just raise the amps" in your picture? Or in other words: Why would the electrons move in the first place and not just be stationary? To go with your picture, it's the voltage that's motivating the electrons to move in the first place. If you wanted for more electrons to cross the finish line in your analogy, you could either widen the track (reduce resistance) or push the little electrons harder (increase the voltage).

This is basically correct.

[helius]

Some particles have an inherent charge. Electrons and quarks are among those fundamental particles which have charge. The explanation for why is a subject for graduate level physics (supersymmetry and/or string theory).
All charged particles interact through what is called the electric field (E). In physical terms, they are surrounded by a sea of "virtual photons" which carry force to and from them in accordance with this field. Photons are the force-carriers of the electric field.
The electric field is also influenced by moving magnetic fields (the Maxwell-Faraday equation). These fields exist everywhere in space; they are not objects that can be reasoned about mechanistically, but properties of the space that fills the universe. Sometimes this has been called "spooky action at a distance" since no physical contact is involved.
Voltage is just the electric field between two points. One of the laws of physics is that any path from one point in the electric field to a second point represents an equal change in electric potential (the energy gained or lost by an object of a certain charge). This change in potential is called the voltage between the two points.
Potential can be thought of as height. In the gravitational field, there is a kind of "ground height" that is defined locally as height of the ground, or can be defined globally as the mean sea level. Raising objects requires adding to their gravitational potential energy, and dropping them releases that energy. If you raise a weight in one location, move it horizontally, and then drop it somewhere else, you effectively move energy from the first location to the second. The energy is being stored as gravitational potential energy in the weight. With a weight with twice the mass, twice as much energy is being moved: we could take the mass out and talk about the "gravitational potential" as the difference in the gravitational field between different heights. This is related to the strength of the field: near the surface it is ~ 9.81 m²/s². At high altitudes, the strength is less, until interplanetary space where it becomes very small.
The situation with charges is equivalent. When a charge is moved into an electric field of the same polarity, its electric potential energy is increased by an amount equal to the magnitude of charge times the voltage between the two points: it is like being "raised" to an "electric height". In a single alkaline cell, the voltage between the terminals is 1.5 V, so a single electron entering the + side and coming out the - side acquires a potential energy of 1.5 eV. This is potential energy entirely caused by the charge's position in the E field, it has nothing to do with velocity. Conductors have low resistance, which means that they are like ideal equipotential surfaces: the electric field is the same throughout the conductor. So we can in effect extend the battery terminals with wires to any length we like. Now all the electrons in the wire connected to the - terminal have the same potential energy relative to the + side: 1.5 eV. If we connect a resistor between the wires, the E field will be 1.5 V across the resistor. Electrons will move through the resistor while losing their potential energy (in this case it is transformed into heat). The resistance limits the rate at which the electrons can enter the resistor, and a very high resistance will dissipate heat at a low power, while a low resistance will heat up as it releases heat quickly. Physically the resistor can be made by winding a wire around a bobbin: the longer the length of wire, the greater the resistance since the electrons have a longer path to follow. There are other ways of making resistors, but it doesn't change this description.

[IanB]

I'm not sure that such a long and technical explanation will help much.

Electronics is a branch of physics. Physics is where you deal with force, energy, charge, fields and so on.

If you try to study electronics at a theoretical level without being well versed in physics you will be totally lost.

Therefore if you do not have that education in physics, you either need to take some physics courses, or you need to stick with simple analogies.

[forrestc]

Amps, I've got figured out.  1 coulomb of electrons is 6.24*10^18 electrons.  That many electrons moving past a point in one second is one amp.  So I think I've got that one sorted.  Similarly, Ohms is resistance... the more ohms, the more resistance, the fewer electrons make it through.

Let me see if I can try a different approach to what everyone else has used.

It's probably useful to introduce ohms law at this point:

E=I*R

So I is current or as you stated.. how many electrons which pass a given point.   
R is resistance, or how difficult it is to push electrons around a circuit.
E is voltage.   Or EMF... Electro-Motive-Force.  Volts just happens to be the unit.

If you think of it this way:   

Current is the actual movement of electrons.
Resistance is how hard  it is to move the electrons.
Voltage is how much force is being applied to the electrons to move them.

Then things logically come out of this:

For a circuit with a given resistance, increasing the voltage will result in more electrons moving or more current, since there is more force being applied to the electrons to force them "through" the resistance.

For a circuit with a given voltage, reducing the resistance will increase the current since there is less opposition to the electrons moving.  With the same amount of force being applied you logically will push more electrons.

Another way to think about this that just occured to me is if you think about pushing a car up a hill..... (or other rolling object),

Volts is how hard you push the car - think: more people and/or pushing harder would push the car faster.
Resistance is how much brake you apply - the harder you push the brake down the more difficult it is to push the car.
Current would be how far you move the car in a certain amount of time.
(and so you think about it when you get there: Watts is a combination of how hard you push the car and how far you move it - just multiply the two).

You could also think about this with a rock (the bigger rock the more resistance, how hard you push the rock is voltage, and how far the rock moves is current) or similar.

One other free resource that may be useful for you: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering    (And I just looked and they use yet another way to try to describe voltage in an intuitive manner - it may work for you instead).

[EEVblog]

Voltage is a potential difference between two points.
Take the example of a tube with a ball bearing in it. Put this tube flat on the ground so there is no height difference between the ends.
Does the ball move either direction? No, it stays still. Why? Because there is no potential (height) difference between one end and the other.
Think of the height difference as the voltage that can cause the ball (current) to move.

Having the tube flat is the same as having 0 volts at the end of each tube.
Or 10 volts at the end of each tube, it doesn't matter, it's the difference in electrical potential (voltage) that allows current to flow based on the resistance across it (ohms law)

[MrAl]

Hi,

There is a difference between understanding the basic nature of something and just being able to use the fact that it has an effect on something else.

Imagine that you did not know what "wind" (the movement of air) was.  You're sitting on the porch and you see your flag start to move, it starts to move in a certain way because the wind picks up, but you dont know what wind is and you do not have the resources to find out, but you do see the flag move.  What could you do to understand wind, without any other input?
One thing you could do is measure how much the flag moves and in what direction, then make conclusions about what this new thing called 'wind' is doing when the flag moves.  You could then understand this thing 'wind' just by knowing how the flag moves, even though you dont really know what wind itself is in an intrinsic way.  You do know the effects it has on the flag though and that tells you a lot.
After your study of the flag (and not the wind itself) you might get a call from a friend, and they might ask you to come over and bring your flag so they could measure the wind in their back yard.  You take your flag with you, then tell your friend they can buy a flag and do the same thing themselves.  They do that, then they can measure the wind any time they want to know how it is behaving, even though they dont know what wind actually is yet either.

So we dont have to know exactly what voltage 'is' but we can measure it's effects on other objects anyway, and use that for all sorts of useful things.  The story of voltage starts with a "point charge".  We can draw conclusions about how this acts when we introduce another "test charge", where the test charge acts like the flag.  We thus understand how things act even if we dont know what they are.

If you know how voltage 'acts' in various circuits, you'll know a lot about electronics even if you dont know exactly what voltage as an object actually is itself.  This is the way a lot of physics works, it's based on experiments and conclusions about what causes the actions that take place.  Since charges either attract or repel, when various concentrations of charge come near to each other they will cause some charge to move and that of course is current.  So voltage itself as we usually know it is the accumulation of charges of differing concentrations in different local regions.

[FrankBuss]

For an intuitive understanding, It makes all sense in the context of ohm's law, which can be visualized like this:

[ggchab]

I love this drawing 

[Brumby]

If electrons all have the same energy, then the only way to increase the rate of energy delivery is to increase the number of electrons moving past a point... which means raising the amps.

You are so close with your understanding at this point - but you missed one critical factor ... Why would the electrons move at all? .... and, if so, how strongly and in which direction?

You need something to push them along - and that's where the volts come in.  Voltage is electrical pressure.  The higher the volts, the more the pressure - which is how you raise the amps.

[kalel]

For an intuitive understanding, It makes all sense in the context of ohm's law, which can be visualized like this:

Wow, awesome! P.S. poor mister Amp even seems to be sweating from the heat generated by friction caused by Mr Ohm?

I guess the height/slope consideration can help with voltage as mentioned by Dave. Oddly enough, they definitely discussed movement of electrons and potential differences in elementary school (although voltage specifically wasn't mentioned), and yet I still didn't get voltage much after. The only difference is that electrons move from - to + (I guess that's called electron flow), while we consider current to flow from + to - (I guess that's called conventional current), e.g. here: https://www.mi.mun.ca/users/cchaulk/eltk1100/ivse/ivse.htm - Although you might understand that already, but if not, it can be helpful to avoid some confusion later.

P.S. I still don't really understand voltage, so take anything I write about it with a grain of salt.

[KL27x]

If I stand next to you and drop a penny on your head, you will feel it. If you stand under the Eiffel tower and I climb to the top and I drop a penny on your head, you will feel it. Same thing,  just on the order of ~1 x 10^-28 coulombs worth of electron-pennies... which is one. But with a little difference in voltage.   

[EEVblog]

For an intuitive understanding, It makes all sense in the context of ohm's law, which can be visualized like this:

Wow, awesome! P.S. poor mister Amp even seems to be sweating from the heat generated by friction caused by Mr Ohm?

And that is Power dissipation!
Power = Voltage X Current

[tooki]

As for the confusion of voltage existing even when there is no current flow at all, consider that voltage is pressure, and that pressure exists in the absence of movement. Think of a gas cylinder: it's under pressure (voltage), but with the valve fully closed (essentially infinity ohms), no gas flow (current) occurs.

[Shock]

Wow, awesome! P.S. poor mister Amp even seems to be sweating from the heat generated by friction caused by Mr Ohm?

Watt?

[Brumby]

There's always one in the crowd.   

[Mechatrommer]

If electrons all have the same energy, then the only way to increase the rate of energy delivery is to increase the number of electrons moving past a point... which means raising the amps.

You are so close with your understanding at this point - but you missed one critical factor ... Why would the electrons move at all? .... and, if so, how strongly and in which direction?
You need something to push them along - and that's where the volts come in.  Voltage is electrical pressure.  The higher the volts, the more the pressure - which is how you raise the amps.

you are close. people talk about pressure... but where the pressure comes from? its from the charge imbalance between 2 points... how to make such charge imbalance? through chemistry (in battery) or some electromotive force, mechanical or electromagnetic... mechanical nature (such as thunder and electrostatics) can be well demonstrated with van de graff ball...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromotive_force
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_de_Graaff_generator

[Brumby]

Voltage is the electrical pressure.  This seems to be the fundamental the OP needs to grasp.  The water analogy works extremely well at this level.

How that pressure is created comes afterwards.

[rstofer]

There are some pretty good descriptions above.  The cartoon says it all!  (So why am I writing this...)

The thing to remember is that when we measure volts, we are measuring the potential difference between any two points.  Consider placing 3 AA batteries (just say they are 1.5V) on a bench, end to end with the + ends all pointing in the same direction.  You can measure between the two ends (an arbitrary 2 points) and get about 4.5 volts.  You can measure across just two batteries (again, 2 arbitrary points) and get about 3 volts and, of course, you can measure across just one battery (again, 2 arbitrary points) and get 1.5V.  For this test, the black probe goes on the - end of the string and the red probe goes on the + end.

Cool, just what we expect!  We connect batteries in series all the time - think flashlights...

Now, let's take battery on the right end of the string and turn it around.  Now we get only 1.5V across the 3 batteries!  Not only does voltage have a magnitude, it has a direction or polarity.  We consider voltage to increase (gain) as current flows from the - to + terminals.  So, we assign a + direction if the current flow is from the - terminal to the + and a - direction when the current flows the other way.  So where we had 1.5 + 1.5 + 1.5 = 4.5, we now have 1.5 + 1.5 - 1.5 = 1.5

The 'any arbitrary 2 points' allows us to measure voltages in our circuit across any component we wish.  In very short order, you will be tracing current flow through circuits with multiple resistors in series or parallel.  When you do, you will be calculating the voltage across and the current through each resistor using Kirchoff's Laws.  If we know the current, we calculate voltage.  If we know the voltage, we calculate current.

[SoundTech-LG]

http://www.circuitmason.com/work-book/lesson-0-basic-terms/lesson-0-section-2-voltage-current-components-power

[Ratch]

Hi, all... I'm enrolled in a distance education electronics course, and I'm right back at the starting gate.

Amps, I've got figured out.  1 coulomb of electrons is 6.24*10^18 electrons.  That many electrons moving past a point in one second is one amp.  So I think I've got that one sorted.  Similarly, Ohms is resistance... the more ohms, the more resistance, the fewer electrons make it through.

But volts... that one just isn't jelling for me.  My texts are telling me that it is 'energy' or 'potential'.  But that's not helping me understand it.  If electrons all have the same energy, then the only way to increase the rate of energy delivery is to increase the number of electrons moving past a point... which means raising the amps.  I'm kinda visualizing the finish line at a racetrack.  As a few electrons pass the finish line, we have a low amp rate.  As more electrons pass the line, we have a higher amp rate.  And really, that ought to be the end of the story.  The only parameters there are amps - the number of electrons passing the finish line - and resistance, which I guess would be the width of the track.

I don't see how volts even figure into that picture.

Can anyone help me get a clearer picture of this?

Thanks - Charlie

Voltage is the energy density of the charge, defined as joules/coulomb in the MKS system. It takes energy to move two charged particles of the same polarity close together. Even more energy if they are moved closer together. Still more energy if several charged particles are gathered. If it takes one joule of energy to corral one coulomb of charge together at a location, that location is defined to have an energy density per charge unit of one volt with reference to where the charges came from. The same polarity charges don't like to be together, and will scatter if a conduction path exists. The resistor and wire provide the conduction path. A higher energy density per unit charge (voltage) at one end of the resistor will cause the charges to move through the resistor to the lower voltage at the opposite end. While traveling through the resistor, the charges will encounter repulsive forces from the ionic cores of the resistor atoms and various fields from other charged particles of matter within the resistor. The charges will lose energy in the form of heat, and will arrive at the other end of the resistor with less energy than they started with. The same number of charges exit the resistor as entered, but with less energy. Therefore, the energy density per unit charge (voltage) will be less. This loss of voltage is called the voltage drop caused by the energy dissipation (heat) loss while transiting the resistor. The wire has much less resistance so the voltage drop is very low and is usually neglected.

Ratch

[bson]

The only parameters there are amps - the number of electrons passing the finish line - and resistance, which I guess would be the width of the track.

Why would electrons want to move in the first place, and why in one direction of wire instead of the other?  They're being pushed by an electromotive force, EMF, measured in Volt.

[Gregg]

Another way to look at it that hasn't been mentioned yet:  Imagine the electrons lined up in the wire like balls in a Newton's cradle.  The electrons in a wire are more like this than water in a pipe in that a potential at one end doesn't cause electrons to zoom from that end to the other.  (It is really much more complicated than a Newton’s cradle, but I think it is a better image than a pipe and water for a beginner.)
The voltage can be imagined as the relationship of how high the first ball is raised (imagine a really long tether) and more importantly how much force it hits the stationary lineup to cause the reaction that makes the ball on the other end move away from the others.  The fact that the far end ball doesn’t move quite as far up as the initial ball is similar to resistance; in this case friction which causes heat (entropy).
If two balls are raised from the stationary group at one end and let go together, two balls will jump off the far end; twice the mass transferred is similar to twice the current.

[Brumby]

The only parameters there are amps - the number of electrons passing the finish line - and resistance, which I guess would be the width of the track.

Why would electrons want to move in the first place, and why in one direction of wire instead of the other?  They're being pushed by an electromotive force, EMF, measured in Volt.

I should have added that to my response.  The pressure I mentioned is EMF - which is, in fact, the EE term.  It's composition is rather self explanatory:  electro  ...  motive  ...  force.

[tpowell1830]

So, from your racetrack analogy where there are horses together in the same racetrack, the racetrack is resistance, but it never changes, but the horses are not the electrons, the riders are. The horses are the volts carrying the 'electrons' down the track. The horse with the highest volts carries the electron faster, where the resistance doesn't change,but the current does. The only reason the current changes is because of the higher voltage of the fastest horse, the winner. Work is done.

A bit of a stretch, but, maybe that works as an analogy that helps you understand?

[Brumby]

I can see you were trying to make use of the racecourse analogy - which is to be commended - but since that wasn't a good analogy in the first place, IMHO, it really didn't have much hope in aiding an explanation.  I just found your extension of it more confusing.

[P90]

For an intuitive understanding, It makes all sense in the context of ohm's law, which can be visualized like this:

I like this

[tpowell1830]

I can see you were trying to make use of the racecourse analogy - which is to be commended - but since that wasn't a good analogy in the first place, IMHO, it really didn't have much hope in aiding an explanation.  I just found your extension of it more confusing.

Oh, thanks for the commendation, I will cherish it, and I apologize if the analogy confused you. I realized that I was beating a dead horse  (pun intended), but the OP seemed to like the racetrack idea. My simple attempt at helping the OP understand using his own analogy.

[Brumby]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt

I would not get too wrapped up in this.  The eV has a place in particle physics for convenience.

i have never tried to visualize voltage this way, but correct me if i am wrong

at the very instant of resisting (i would imagine this as stopping time?) 6.241509126 ×10^18 (1 coulomb) electrons from moving across 1 ohm
those electrons (1 coulomb worth?), will exhibit 1 volt potential across the 1 ohm. but how many electrons exactly?

Not quite right.  The 1V does not come from the electrons in the 1 ohm resistor.  It comes from the EMF that is applied to one end of the resistor*.  The electrons in the resistor don't create the 1V - they react to it, according to how the resistor allows.

same 1C of electrons over 10 ohms = 1volt, as 10x resistance only allow 1/10 C to pass per sec.

Again, the electrons in the resistor don't create the 1V - they react to it, according to how the resistor allows.

(which makes the volt = joule per coulomb, whats the scientific term for this? energy is conserved?)
so time is an essential part of this whole "voltage" thing, as x amount of electrons need to get "somewhere else" in an amount of time, that movement uses energy, and that is the description in volts.

You are mixing up 3 different quantities here: Charge, Energy and Work.  Only Work is dependent on time.

i then further think that, if our entire planet is at 1000volts, and nobody will feel a thing, because no electrons moved and no energy is used to move it to anywhere else potentially higher or lower,

In terms of electric current, you are pretty much correct.  There will, however, be an electrostatic repulsion between any two objects at 1000V

so actually voltage is just trying to tell me, energy differences between groups of electrons in different places at a certain time ( i probably went a little too far in my imagination of this 1 haha)

i guess the above is a sane explaination?

Again, time is not relevant, but the energy difference is a part of it.

this then i guess, will perfectly explain why in volt nutting, they use a "bridge" to measure voltage, as voltage visualized as a "pressure" stream of electrons meets another "pressure" stream on a "bridge" and no electron is moving anywhere as both sides have equal pressure, and on 1 side the "pressure" is counted to know whats going on the other side of the "bridge".

now this then leads to a "hole" in my brain, as this is call a voltage bridge, what is the term called for a 34401a DMM voltage measurement? ohmic something something bla bla? the "leaky" method of measuring voltage with volt meters. now i am thinking, it would be cool if someone miniaturize the "volt bridge" as a handheld voltmeter, ie : handheld voltmeter with infinite input impedance. volt nuts will need to rename the club, electron counting nut

The traditional multimeter presents a loading of the circuit under test.  Obviously the less, the better (under most circumstances**)  The less current drawn from the circuit, the less impact it will have on the measurement.  These days, it is common for a DMM to have the same loading on a circuit as a 10M ohm resistor - and they are able to do this quite inexpensively.  This is pretty high and is good enough for most common situations - even those where the measurement might be affected, an experienced person will have a feel for how much that effect might be - and be able to interpret the reading with some reasoning.

Certainly, the portable bridge meter is not an impossibility - but I'll leave comment on that to the volt nuts.

Edit: Missed these footnotes:
* Argument assumes a common connection exists as the 0V reference
** Sometimes, (as an example, an unconnected wire in an EM field) you will have a conductor that will show a misleading voltage if measured with a high impedance meter.  At such times, a meter that actually has a low impedance input will 'drain' such voltages and give a truer idea of the actual voltage on that conductor.  Dave's BM235 has such a range.

[CharlieWorton]

WOW!

That's an unbelievable response!  Thank you so much!!!

So I posted the topic and figured I'd let it simmer for a while... A day later, well, I didn't really think anyone would have bothered, but, you know, hope springs eternal...

HOLY SCHMOKES!

Thanks to IanB, rstofer, Sweeney, helius, forrestc, EEVblog, MrAl, FrankBuss, ggchab, Brumby, kalel, KL27x, took,i Shock, Mechatrommer, SoundTech-LG, Ratch, bson... This is just fantastic.

Someone - I forget who, perhaps more than one - posed the question "what is it that makes the electrons move?"  I read that, I had this sharp intake of breath, my eyes widened a little bit... and it all fell into place.

Voltage ain't a thing, like an electron.  It's a force.

In my 'electrons across the finish line' analogy, electrons with a tiny amount of voltage are weak little pencil necks who are easily dissuaded.  As they get more voltage - muscles - they get harder and harder to block.  And Shwarzenegger electrons have so much voltage behind them that they just blow a hole right through you, if you get in their way.

It's oomph.  Enthusiasm.

A force.

Got it!

People, this was massively helpful.  I spent most of the day at McDonalds ($1 soft drinks with free refills) with my laptop, studying away like a busy little beaver.  Just about ready to write my next exam - second in a series of 23 - and then on to the next module.

Oh, hey, FrankBuss - that was a hilarious cartoon!  I'm gonna print it out and put it in my hobby room.  When I get it finished, that is.  Almost finished clearing it out, then I have to paint it, then build some furniture for it.  It will be a combination Office/Electronics cubbyhole/3D printer cubbyhole/Library.  All in about 80 square feet of space.  Yeah, it's gonna be tight.

And here's something of interest:

You'll note the Rigol Oscilloscope, offered on Amazon for $8.28 Canadian.  Including shipping, no less.  So, what the heck?  I bought one.

Well, things that sound too good to be true, usually are.  It seems that Amazon has been infested with thousands of scam artists who set up as merchants in the Amazon Marketplace, list goods at attractive prices - sometimes laughably attractive - and just tell Amazon that they've shipped the goods.  On nothing more than a verbal statement and a fake tracking number from a nonexistent shipping company, Amazon then pays them in full.  But the goods were not shipped; in fact, they never existed.

So, I had a quiet chat with Amazon, and they are refunding me my $8.28.  Oh, and if the oscilloscope ever shows up, I get to keep it.  But I think the funniest part of the deal is the screenshot of the listing.

I'm working on a ridiculously tight budget, so - although I want one - I don't see an oscilloscope in the immediate future.  The Rigol comes in at around $600 Canadian with tax and shipping.  For about $400 I can get the Hantek DSO5202P from China.  2 channels, not 4; 200Mhz, not 100Mhz.  I don't see an immediate requirement for a scope, and the money really isn't in the budget anyway... I just want a scope.  So, if you have thoughts, I'm all ears.

Thanks again, everyone.  You really helped!

Thanks, Charlie

[3roomlab]

Not quite right.  The 1V does not come from the electrons in the 1 ohm resistor.  It comes from the EMF that is applied to one end of the resistor*.  The electrons in the resistor don't create the 1V - they react to it, according to how the resistor allows.

i knew there are problems the way i draw cartoons in my head.

i got the idea electrons create the potential difference because of this article
https://clectronics.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/radiation-sensor/
i think i mis-understand the eV (energy unit) as it is converted into a charge (coulomb unit) and an actual electron EMF value.

silicon converts 1.1eV energy into 1 free electron (or so i read?), i assume different particles reacts in different ways producing a different ratio?
so 5keV alpha produce 4545 pairs, create a charge of (4545 x 1.602e-19 =) 7.28e-16 coulomb, which on a 10pF photodiode appears as an EMF of 72.8uV.
the way the EMF appears (or how the alpha strikes the silicon) is the interesting part which i cant find information about. it is like a ring tone, you cant get out of your head 
(edit : it appears 1.1eV may not be the actual rate of impact ionization)

so with this, my understanding of EMF is the measurable force able to move charges around, time is not a factor. when charges start to move, energy is used, and this is where time is a factor. am i connecting the dots correctly?

[rstofer]

I'm working on a ridiculously tight budget, so - although I want one - I don't see an oscilloscope in the immediate future.  The Rigol comes in at around $600 Canadian with tax and shipping.  For about $400 I can get the Hantek DSO5202P from China.  2 channels, not 4; 200Mhz, not 100Mhz.  I don't see an immediate requirement for a scope, and the money really isn't in the budget anyway... I just want a scope.  So, if you have thoughts, I'm all ears.

Don't forget to include the new Siglent SDS1202X-E in your list of candidates.  It's only 2 channels but it is 200 MHz and, so far, people are enthusiastic.  Search the forum...

[Brumby]

Not quite right.  The 1V does not come from the electrons in the 1 ohm resistor.  It comes from the EMF that is applied to one end of the resistor*.  The electrons in the resistor don't create the 1V - they react to it, according to how the resistor allows.

i knew there are problems the way i draw cartoons in my head.

i got the idea electrons create the potential difference because of this article
https://clectronics.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/radiation-sensor/
i think i mis-understand the eV (energy unit) as it is converted into a charge (coulomb unit) and an actual electron EMF value.

silicon converts 1.1eV energy into 1 free electron (or so i read?), i assume different particles reacts in different ways producing a different ratio?
so 5keV alpha produce 4545 pairs, create a charge of (4545 x 1.602e-19 =) 7.28e-16 coulomb, which on a 10pF photodiode appears as an EMF of 72.8uV.
the way the EMF appears (or how the alpha strikes the silicon) is the interesting part which i cant find information about. it is like a ring tone, you cant get out of your head 

Discussion of the mechanisms involved in the photoelectric effect are a little outside the OPs original question - and I might suggest a separate thread with a more appropriate title will attract more interest.

so with this, my understanding of EMF is the measurable force able to move charges around, time is not a factor. when charges start to move, energy is used, and this is where time is a factor. am i connecting the dots correctly?

Basically, yes.

[Frankenbee]

Someone once told me to imagine a spark gap. High voltage will spark across a wider gap. Not sure if it's true but it helped me to visualize voltage better than the water analogy.

[Brumby]

Yes, it is true.

As for analogies, they won't always make sense to everybody - but for some they are a beacon of enlightenment.  That's just how they are.

For the water analogy, voltage is equivalent to pressure (it can actually be described as electrical pressure).  Think of a garden hose and a fire hose from a fire engine's pumps.  More pressure = greater distance ... just like your spark.

[MrAl]

Hello again,

Imagine you have 10 basketballs clustered together on the ground.  Now you take your hand and move 6 to the right and 4 to the left.  What is the difference from one side to the other?  The difference is 6-4=2.  Before you did that though there was no difference because there was only one group to consider.  Once you get two groups you see a difference, and that is similar to the way voltage is 'formed'.

Voltage is something you 'get' when you separate charge.  If you have ten units of charge and you move 6 to the right and 4 to the left, you have a voltage difference between the two groups.

So current is a movement of charge, and voltage results from a static separation of charge.  Once you separate charge the higher potential tries to shift toward the lower potential so we may see current flow.  It's a law of physics that everything has a natural tendency to minimize the energy.  We often like to force this to happen by using something like a battery so we can get things to happen that we like to have happen, like light an LED.

A little comical view is that we all like to spend money.  We have a group of coins in our pocket we would like to transfer to someone else so we can gain some sort of benefit.  Their hand is initially empty and our pocket is full, so we transfer some coins into their hand (current) and we gain some material benefit :-)

[rstofer]

I'm working on a ridiculously tight budget, so - although I want one - I don't see an oscilloscope in the immediate future.  The Rigol comes in at around $600 Canadian with tax and shipping.  For about $400 I can get the Hantek DSO5202P from China.  2 channels, not 4; 200Mhz, not 100Mhz.  I don't see an immediate requirement for a scope, and the money really isn't in the budget anyway... I just want a scope.  So, if you have thoughts, I'm all ears.

I think the beginner is better served with something like the Digilent Analog Discovery 2 because it is a complete lab in a box.  A small box!

Dual channel scope, dual adjustable power supplies, dual arbitrary waveform generator, 16 channels of digital IO that can be used as a logic analyzer, etc.  Download the free software and play with the demos...

I would recommend the Pro bundle:
http://store.digilentinc.com/analog-discovery-2-pro-bundle/

It's worth reading the product description or even heading over to the Resource Center
http://store.digilentinc.com/analog-discovery-2-100msps-usb-oscilloscope-logic-analyzer-and-variable-power-supply/

Do not underestimate the utility of this tool.

Back to voltage:  I think of it as a force and that is the limit in my interest of the physics involved.  It is the force required to get a certain current to flow through a specific resistance.