Author Topic: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?  (Read 5251 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abdullahsebaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: gb
Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« on: January 21, 2017, 01:58:42 pm »
Hi
I am in the middle of designing a telephone interface for a pc. I noticed that most examples have two 100nF capacitors at the input of the audio transformer. This makes sense for a ring detection circuit but would it not block the audio from coming out?
Example:

Also what's the purpose of the zener diodes?
Thanks in advance.
This is my right hand this is my wrong hand
 

Offline Seekonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1938
  • Country: us
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2017, 02:05:51 pm »
The telephone line is at 50V DC, phone will never unhook with a resistive load.  The ringer is at 150V AC, hence you need zeners to limit voltage that will damage external devices.
 
The following users thanked this post: abdullahseba

Offline madires

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7755
  • Country: de
  • A qualified hobbyist ;)
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2017, 02:18:29 pm »
And for the VMWI there could 90V DC.
 

Offline abdullahsebaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: gb
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2017, 03:42:32 pm »
The telephone line is at 50V DC, phone will never unhook with a resistive load.  The ringer is at 150V AC, hence you need zeners to limit voltage that will damage external devices.
Thanks.
Do you know you would accept a call? For example do you apply a resistor between the A and B wires or a tone?
This is my right hand this is my wrong hand
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16276
  • Country: za
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2017, 04:19:24 pm »
Normally to accept a call you would provide a 600R load, made up from the transformer primary winding resistance and impedance, but the transformer must be able to handle the 50mA or so of DC current that will flow through it.  Commonly these days you use a transistor constant current circuit ( and a bridge rectifier so it only has to handle DC, and does not care if the line polarity is reversed for some reason) to pass around 40mA of current, which does the off hook emulation, and the constant current circuit gives a high AC impedance so the audio signals are not going to be attenuated by it, and the capacitors on the transformer primary still provide DC isolation. The constant current circuit however has to handle up to 200VDC on it, as it has to provide the current sink even during a ring cycle, as the system provides from 60-160VAC 25Hz ( for the UK) to ring the bells, riding on top of the -48VDC on hook line voltage.
 
The following users thanked this post: abdullahseba

Online Benta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5869
  • Country: de
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2017, 04:20:18 pm »
The capacitors are for DC blocking. Without them, the transformers would saturate.
What your schematic shows is only the audio part.
Ring detection and off-hook signalling are two additional circuits.

« Last Edit: January 21, 2017, 04:23:51 pm by Benta »
 
The following users thanked this post: abdullahseba

Offline abdullahsebaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: gb
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2017, 08:48:37 am »
Normally to accept a call you would provide a 600R load, made up from the transformer primary winding resistance and impedance, but the transformer must be able to handle the 50mA or so of DC current that will flow through it.  Commonly these days you use a transistor constant current circuit ( and a bridge rectifier so it only has to handle DC, and does not care if the line polarity is reversed for some reason) to pass around 40mA of current, which does the off hook emulation, and the constant current circuit gives a high AC impedance so the audio signals are not going to be attenuated by it, and the capacitors on the transformer primary still provide DC isolation. The constant current circuit however has to handle up to 200VDC on it, as it has to provide the current sink even during a ring cycle, as the system provides from 60-160VAC 25Hz ( for the UK) to ring the bells, riding on top of the -48VDC on hook line voltage.
Would something like this work?
This is my right hand this is my wrong hand
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16276
  • Country: za
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2017, 12:25:36 pm »
Not with the triac, but will work with a high voltage optotransistor. There are optoisolators designed for telephone line off hook work, or simply do what has been done before, and use a relay with a 5V coil instead.
 
The following users thanked this post: abdullahseba

Offline abdullahsebaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: gb
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2017, 12:28:02 pm »
Not with the triac, but will work with a high voltage optotransistor. There are optoisolators designed for telephone line off hook work, or simply do what has been done before, and use a relay with a 5V coil instead.
Just out of curiosity, why can't I use a triac? It's used for 240v ac.
This is my right hand this is my wrong hand
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16276
  • Country: za
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2017, 04:29:24 pm »
Triac turns on on DC, but will not turn off till the current drops below holding current. Thus on AC it turns off every half cycle once triggered, but on DC it just stays on till you disconnect the phone line. You can run them on DC but then the circuit gets a lot more complex, and a relay will work out both cheaper, more reliable and smaller.
 
The following users thanked this post: abdullahseba

Offline abdullahsebaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 335
  • Country: gb
Re: Why have a capacitor on a telephone input?
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2017, 11:03:54 pm »
Triac turns on on DC, but will not turn off till the current drops below holding current. Thus on AC it turns off every half cycle once triggered, but on DC it just stays on till you disconnect the phone line. You can run them on DC but then the circuit gets a lot more complex, and a relay will work out both cheaper, more reliable and smaller.
Thanks
So does it act as a hook switch? Example if I wanted to place a call I'd turn on the relay than send the DTMF tones and when I release the relay the call would end?


I've included the full schematic below.
Sorry about the mess, but I'm not fond of diagrams in sections 8).
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AqGREZOPB-wppHqhXGhMM4ibbB-m

This is my right hand this is my wrong hand
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf