Nice pair of vids. I've wondered what the real differences were between Fluke and others, so it was good to see a good, quality comparison to a higher end DVM. I especially liked the reference to the "confidence of measurements" comments. This is the bottom-line reason a Fluke (or equivalent, reputable instrument) is a necessity for a professional (but perhaps overkill for a hobbyist).
Tools are important to a professional, and working at my day job I would never argue to save a few hundred dollars on my most used test tool, when confidence in my work product (or more importantly, confidence in my company's product) was on the line. Being an EE, of course I have a handful at home from $3 units scattered around, to a handful of others in a range of quality/cost, but my favorite is still my Fluke 233 (but honestly, the $3 ones are great for non-critical measurements).
One clarification though: the Fluke PWB has four layers. You can tell because on one edge of the board (at the north side) there is a standard PWB layer marking (each layer has a copper number character, slightly offset). I spotted the '4' in the vid with a hint of '3' just below it. The benefit you get from the added cost (2 to 4 layers is a big jump) is better shielding of sensitive signals (also hinted at with the conductive cover over the ceramic component).
Thx