Author Topic: eev blog 262  (Read 41820 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jsoderquist

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 19
  • Country: us
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2012, 12:39:30 pm »
I'm still trying to wrap my head around your comment concerning tapping the white board, Dave - people really complained about it? That baffles me.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2012, 12:51:42 pm »
I'm still trying to wrap my head around your comment concerning tapping the white board, Dave - people really complained about it? That baffles me.

Yep, they do.
For every nit-picking thing in my videos, you can be sure their will be someone who complains about it!

Dave.
 

Offline Rerouter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4694
  • Country: au
  • Question Everything... Except This Statement
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2012, 12:56:42 pm »
your way to good at laughing at nitpickers :D
 

Offline stryker

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 99
  • Country: au
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2012, 01:01:24 pm »
Hi Dave

Thanks for the inspirational videos (and fwiw no problems here with the whiteboard tapping either!).

Apologies for the newbie question.  Have just started with electronics and want to take this to a breadboard for a play but don't have a P channel MOSFET in the supplies just yet.  At one stage your diagram had IRF9110 marked on there.  Is there anything special in the selection, or will any P-channel do for the sake of the exercise?  From google-fu it looks like IRFD9110 is the breadboard-friendly one?

Thanks
Geoff
 

Offline Greg323i

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 29
  • Country: au
  • Resistance is futile! (If less than 1 ohm)
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2012, 01:18:23 pm »
Personally, I found it annoying, but you know what? Why complain about some little pittily bullshit thing when I'm gaining so much great information. If it annoyed me that much I wouldn't watch the videos and I'd STFU!!! It's rather cliche, but if you don't have something nice to say, then STFU!!

Just my little ol' opinion!  ;)
 

Offline Rufus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2095
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2012, 01:47:09 pm »
A patent applied for variation

http://www.faqs.org/patents/imgfull/20090237065_01

I recently had the same requirement except one side of the push button is ground. I don't think there is a  two transistor plus a few passives solution to that one.

To control a battery supply you should also have an automatic low battery turn off to prevent complete battery discharge. For the uSupply the processor monitors the battery so it would probably be better to use a processor pin which could do the automatic turn off and on/off latching.


 

Offline Neilm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1546
  • Country: gb
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2012, 03:54:17 pm »
I'm still trying to wrap my head around your comment concerning tapping the white board, Dave - people really complained about it? That baffles me.

Yep, they do.
For every nit-picking thing in my videos, you can be sure their will be someone who complains about it!

Dave.

You should have had the evil laugh going when you were tapping it :)   MWhahahahahahahaha

Neil
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tesla referral code https://ts.la/neil53539
 

Online IanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11891
  • Country: us
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2012, 05:16:35 pm »
I'm still trying to wrap my head around your comment concerning tapping the white board, Dave - people really complained about it? That baffles me.

Yep, they do.
For every nit-picking thing in my videos, you can be sure their will be someone who complains about it!

Dave.

Hmm. If you really want to send a message you could try a big sheet of paper and a felt tip/marker pen (see numberphile). All sorts of nice squeaky, scratchy noises available there to entertain people  ;D

(And yes, half the YouTube comments are from people complaining about the squeaky pen noises. You are not alone with nitpickers...)
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 11:20:36 pm by IanB »
 

Offline Chet T16

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 535
  • Country: ie
    • Retro-Renault
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2012, 06:39:42 pm »
Whiteboard tapping highlights my audio sync issues :(
Chet
Paid Electron Wrestler
 

Offline king.oslo

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 432
  • Country: no
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2012, 07:56:58 pm »
Hi Dave

Thanks for the inspirational videos (and fwiw no problems here with the whiteboard tapping either!).

Apologies for the newbie question.  Have just started with electronics and want to take this to a breadboard for a play but don't have a P channel MOSFET in the supplies just yet.  At one stage your diagram had IRF9110 marked on there.  Is there anything special in the selection, or will any P-channel do for the sake of the exercise?  From google-fu it looks like IRFD9110 is the breadboard-friendly one?

Thanks
Geoff

Geoff,

Use any. You got to check the datasheet and find its VGS. It has to be more negative than your GND to rail voltage. It also have to be rated high enough for the main voltages and currents which it will conduct.

Kind regards,
Marius
 

Offline electroguy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 78
  • Country: au
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #35 on: March 30, 2012, 11:57:53 pm »
Dave, can you please use a blackboard and some chalk in your next few videos. i can't believe people actually complain about stuff like this. lol
There are 10 types of people that understand binary, those that do and those that don't!
 

Offline Zad

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1013
  • Country: gb
    • Digital Wizardry, Analogue Alchemy, Software Sorcery
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2012, 03:25:53 am »
I've got you all beat.  $0.33 each.

[Pushbutton switch]

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

That's my solution too. Cheap, reliable, small. Or use a rocker. Something like this is less prone to casual knocks. There is something reassuring about a click as contacts make or break. That feedback is part of what generates perceived product quality. Soft switches are a bit... vague.

Offline johnnyfp

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 261
  • Country: nz
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2012, 03:50:08 am »
But wheres the fun in that? Rocker switches are mmh, old school. Momentary push switches are hip and trendy  :P

But in either case, I can't get this new and revised version working in my spice emulator.  The old one with two transistors works, but this new one with either one transistor or two Mosfets, I just can't get to emulate. I'm wonder how sensitive the balance of the values or fet/transistors I used can affect the simulator.



Jfp
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 03:52:51 am by johnnyfp »
 

Offline kaz911

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1052
  • Country: gb
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2012, 04:35:16 am »
I would say - use an XOR gate driving the mosfet - and tie the output of the mosfet to on input pin - and other XOR to the switch with a cap.

Switch 0v - VccIn 0v - output 0v (stay off)
Switch 5v - VccIn 0v - output 5v (switch on)
Switch 0v - VccIn 5v - output 5v (stay on)
Switch 5v - VccIn 5v - output 0v (switch off)

Seems a bit simpler in component count. But I don't know about cost..

/kaz
 

Offline Bored@Work

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3932
  • Country: 00
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2012, 08:52:53 am »
I'm wonder how sensitive the balance of the values or fet/transistors I used can affect the simulator.

It is rather sensitive. And just putting 100k resistors everywhere won't cut it. You need to dimension each resistor and the cap appropriately. For example, R5 is likely too large to drive Q2 as switch. But on the other hand, it shouldn't be to low, otherwise it gets difficult to turn the transistor off. And add a capacitive load, since the load has influence on the behaviour, making the circuit even more sensitive.

In general, I don't see much advantage compared to a mechanical switch, especially because the soft switch is not controlled by the micro. If it would be controlled by the micro one could add some features like auto-turn-off when idle (no current drawn for x minutes -> turn off), which might be interesting for a battery powered device.
I delete PMs unread. If you have something to say, say it in public.
For all else: Profile->[Modify Profile]Buddies/Ignore List->Edit Ignore List
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16284
  • Country: za
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2012, 11:10:08 am »
Only issue I have is humid environments. Leakage can do odd things then.
 

Offline FreeThinker

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 791
  • Country: england
  • Truth through Thought
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2012, 04:32:18 pm »
Toggi, I did look at your solution, but I couldn't get it to work fully when you start adding capacitance to the load.

Dave reckons his answer of how to use seven parts including the switch was in front of his eyes, but I still cannot see it.

Toggi had it essentially right, except it uses a MOSFET instead of the BJT, thus needing one less resistor.
But as it turns out, it seems it's not new, somebody tweeted the same thing on a Russian site:
http://www.uschema.com/safe_power_switch/

It became really obvious on second thought, because I was obsessed with doing the turn on/off using the gate connected BJT. But when you think about the using the gate of the P MOSTFET itself, it's obvious the existing RC can be used and there is no need for the 2nd latch BJT

Dave.
;D
Truly there is nothing new, nice try anyway Lol.
Machines were mice and Men were lions once upon a time, but now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.
MOONDOG
 

Offline siliconmix

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 466
  • Country: wales
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #42 on: April 01, 2012, 08:50:37 am »
amspire : now that i think about it and after i tested a little, you are right. If the load is capacitive and has a large capacitance then the functionality is quite weird.
If you match the capacitance of the load in the timing capacitor then you can kinda make it work but the timings are quite large.
I really have to start thinking laterally when trying to understand circuits

Later edit: This is what i mean http://goo.gl/RCZUI
hey i like that falstad applet.why havent i seen this before ? ;D
 

Offline PA3BNX

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 166
  • Country: nl
  • Trying to learn better programming and designing !
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2012, 03:30:20 pm »
Hello Every body,

I didn't see no comments on the fact that there could be RF present on the input and output
of this switch hi...

But I maybe should add a diode in series with the capacitor so the voltage will drop
to zero also if there is almost or no load.

There are many TFT TVs that switches on and off if I transmit close to it with my 2/0.70m  5 Watt  handheld.

Very annoying hi...
« Last Edit: April 23, 2012, 08:36:56 pm by PA3BNX »
Greetings,

Lodewijk

Credo:

Home brew projects:
Build/Design  with minimum hardware
and maximal software.
 

Offline bpkdasbaum

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #44 on: April 09, 2012, 03:01:27 pm »
Hi everyone,

I went on a crusade for several hours to find me a latching momentary switch, until I finally ended up here. Though I should have checked this blog first >_> since i've been watching the videos now and then, informative and fun! Thx by the way Dave.

Now, I really don't understand most of technical background stuff here and would like to get some help with the parts.

I would like to know if the schematic will work this these transistors, since I can't find the exact ones used in the video/schematics, but according to the data sheets i've looked up, they are pretty much the same.

I am using this schematic as a reference, since Dave said in a post here, that is pretty much the best solution and is the same he came up with too after making his video:




Infineon BSS 123 N datasheet
IRLML6401 datasheet


So can i use those 2?

Thanks in advance





 

Offline amspire

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3802
  • Country: au
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #45 on: April 09, 2012, 04:04:41 pm »
That circuit was the best in terms of least components, but it does not work well if your load has capacitors across the supply rails. The one I did back on the first page of posts has one extra resistor, but it is the one that works best with a capacitive load.  The circuit is from LTSpice, so there is extra junk in the diagram for the simulation.

To me the method in general is not a robust solution as it depends a so much on the way the load behaves. For example, a transient from the load circuit can turn the supply on, even if the switch is not touched. If your load was a linear regulator IC with a reverse diode across it, and you attach an external load to the regulator output which happens to have a charged supply cap, then this switch circuit will turn itself on

Richard.
 

Offline bpkdasbaum

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #46 on: April 09, 2012, 04:55:37 pm »
i don't have anything fancy in the main circuit, just a 9v battery and 3 fans, thats it. But space is an issue, thus I am aiming for the one with the least parts, it should work just fine.
I just need to know, if it will work at all with those 2 transistors.


« Last Edit: April 09, 2012, 05:00:49 pm by bpkdasbaum »
 

Offline T4P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3697
  • Country: sg
    • T4P
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #47 on: April 09, 2012, 05:01:48 pm »
i don't have anything fancy in the main circuit, just a 9v battery and 3 fans, thats it. But space is an issue, thus I am aiming for the one with the least parts, it should work just fine.
I just need to know, if it will work at all with those 2 transistors.
Be careful of inductive spiking .
 

Offline amspire

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3802
  • Country: au
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #48 on: April 09, 2012, 09:11:37 pm »
i don't have anything fancy in the main circuit, just a 9v battery and 3 fans, thats it. But space is an issue, thus I am aiming for the one with the least parts, it should work just fine.
I just need to know, if it will work at all with those 2 transistors.

You will have to check to see if the fans generate any voltage while they are slowing down. If they do, they will turn the switch back on just after you press the button to turn the switch off.

Richard.
 

Offline billclay

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 82
  • Country: us
Re: eev blog 262
« Reply #49 on: April 09, 2012, 09:23:30 pm »
I'm still trying to wrap my head around your comment concerning tapping the white board, Dave - people really complained about it? That baffles me.

Yep, they do.
For every nit-picking thing in my videos, you can be sure their will be someone who complains about it!

Dave.

Dave, you are using the wrong color marker on the whiteboard.  Please stop it.  ;)  :P

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf