Author Topic: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH  (Read 15308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8275
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #25 on: April 13, 2019, 02:46:51 am »
By the way, Dave got really lucky.
Clive took NiMh apart and they ot really exiting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBg4ximDrsk=related#t=16m10
Metal hydrides are pyrophoric. mikeselectricstuff has also experienced this, in a slightly different product:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y48wCuC3KcA#t=47m20s
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #26 on: April 13, 2019, 08:48:52 am »
Not a ripoff, they're clearly marked and also cheaper than the "real thing"

 

Offline wilfred

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1252
  • Country: au
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #27 on: April 13, 2019, 10:57:14 am »
Not a ripoff, they're clearly marked and also cheaper than the "real thing"
EEVblog #1200 - CONFIRMED! Energizer & Duracell NiMH meet stated capacity.

Get real. If those scumbags make a battery with air inside they should have made it smaller.
 

Offline NivagSwerdna

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2495
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #28 on: April 13, 2019, 11:10:26 am »
Get real. If those scumbags make a battery with air inside they should have made it smaller.
Wouldn't really fit as a replacement for a D-cell then would it?  |O
 
The following users thanked this post: jancumps, StuUK, wraper, Fungus

Offline ricard2k

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17
  • Country: ie
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #29 on: April 13, 2019, 11:59:40 am »
Incredible that this kind of firms could do these....

Are an appreciable price difference between RS one and the “mass market” others?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Offline madires

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7765
  • Country: de
  • A qualified hobbyist ;)
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #30 on: April 13, 2019, 02:51:08 pm »
Let's agree on "naughty". They could simply sell a AA or C cell plus a D cell adapter. Hiding everything in a D cell package is naughty since most consumers don't know much about Ah ratings and might be pleasantly surprised about the low price. This could be the marketing strategy behind it.
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #31 on: April 13, 2019, 04:05:46 pm »
It's slightly shady but as I mentioned earlier it's been this way for ~40 years almost universally, the standard sub-c cell being the most common. There have long been some true D rechargeable cells available but they have always cost a lot more, seems like they were around $25 each in the 90s.
 

Offline Artlav

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 750
  • Country: mon
    • Orbital Designs
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #32 on: April 13, 2019, 09:17:14 pm »
Ah, i was wondering what the deal is.
Thought there was some sort of a law limiting the capacity of the "legit" ones - i could only get 8-10 Ah ones from lesser known and unknown brands but they tested up to spec rather than being rip-offs typical for off-brand 18650s.
 

Online tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7390
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #33 on: April 13, 2019, 09:33:08 pm »
But then, there are very few applications that require D cell.  Boom boxes, flashlights and toys. Anything high drain high energy moved to Lithium, and this is just to keep an old market alive. Sources claim that is was like 2-3% of the battery market a decade ago. Most battery never gets charged 10% of its claimed lifetime...
 

Offline MrMobodies

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1912
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #34 on: April 13, 2019, 09:57:20 pm »
When I needed several D cells to run for several hours, I got the AA to D adapters and used eneloops.  Worked great for the time I needed them.

I brought a bag of those dual AA enclosures/adapters many years ago and they are very handy as I use many rechargeable AA'S

I had a collection 2500 mah Energizers but they went flat after a week and I replaced them with Annsman 2850 but they were wern't 2850 mah more like under 2500mah and they held charge for about a month.

I brought some big Annsman D cells in 2007 for a torch. They did discharge up near 10,000mah when I got them but they kept on going flat and eventually they bulged on the negative plate and stopped accepting a charge. I was a disappointed as they cost a lot but now I use the AA enclosures to fit C and D cells.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2019, 09:59:24 pm by MrMobodies »
 

Offline wilfred

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1252
  • Country: au
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #35 on: April 13, 2019, 11:26:36 pm »
Get real. If those scumbags make a battery with air inside they should have made it smaller.
Wouldn't really fit as a replacement for a D-cell then would it?  |O



noun: irony

    the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.

 ;)


Dave was have a bit of fun winding up mock outrage. You can tell from the first few minutes. I'll quote him.

"In addition to having them clearly marked on the batteries themselves, in the datasheet, everything's legitimate. It is marked on the packaging, there it is, 2500mAh..."
"These are legitimately less capacity"

and he proceeds to bounce them in a manner akin to his video on alkaline cells as a capacity test.


It wouldn't surprise me if he was flirting with this idea as some form of April fool prank but he couldn't quite figure out how to make it work to his satisfaction.

Of course I could be quite wrong.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2019, 11:42:40 pm by wilfred »
 

Offline retiredcaps

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3575
  • Country: ca
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #36 on: April 14, 2019, 02:56:47 am »
I had a collection 2500 mah Energizers but they went flat after a week
I have some of those, but 2300 mAh.  These were pre low self discharge technology.
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #37 on: April 14, 2019, 04:08:21 am »
I retired all of my non-LSD batteries, they're just too much hassle compared to the ones I can charge and put in the drawer ready to go.
 

Online ejeffrey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3719
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #38 on: April 14, 2019, 05:50:35 am »
Old news. That has been the case since they first introduced NimH batteries. A true D cell is at least 5000mAh.

D-cells are on their way out. apart from flashlights very little stuff uses that, and with the advent of powerful LED lights the flashlight marked has moved to LiIon rechargeable. You can find many adapters to convert C to D or 3 or 4 AA or AAA to D.

Even before NiMH, NiCd batteries were this way too.  The inside cell is actually a standard size sub C.  sub C cells were also used directly in devices where the cells were welded into a pack or permanently connected into a device with a built in charging circuit.  Cordless drills and electric shavers were typical application of sub-C NiCd batteries.  There is a good chance that if you disassemble a 'C" battery you will also find a spacer with a smaller internal cell size.
 

Offline MrMobodies

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1912
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #39 on: April 14, 2019, 03:55:15 pm »
I have found an interesting article written a while ago about the pricing when they did put AA's in D cells:

https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1041965/energizer-rechargeable-d-batteries-rip

Quote
Energizer rechargeable "D" batteries are a rip-off
Really just "AA" cells inside

Egan Orion
07 November 2007
 
A CONSUMER ACTIVIST took a closer look at Energizer brand rechargeable "D" size batteries and found that they provide only "AA" battery capacity, at four times the price.

Rechargeable nickel metal hydride (NiMH) batteries are great. They can be used over and over again up to 1,000 times, avoiding the need to buy, and then later throw away, a lot of nonrechargeable alkaline batteries.

Sure, they're expensive, but recharging them repeatedly makes their use more economical in the long run than buying many disposable batteries. If you fully discharge them each time before recharging, they can last practically indefinitely without degrading due to battery memory effects. But battery companies would rather sell lots of alkaline batteries, naturally, because they make a profit on each one of those sold.

So NewsTarget took a look at one of the most common sizes of rechargeable batteries sold by a leading US brand, the Energizer "D" cell used in most full-sized household flashlights, among other applications. What intrigued them was that the battery's stated capacity is only 2,500 mAh, the same capacity as given for the physically much smaller "AA" size batteries.

They took apart one of Energizer's "D" batteries and found that it contained a much smaller battery inside, comparable in size to an "AA" battery, surrounded by empty airspace and a plastic shell. The "D" cell actually turned out to be just an "AA" cell inside a larger casing.

Since Energizer's rechargeable "AA" battery costs only about $3, but its rechargeable "D" battery costs $12, or four times as much, they reckon you're getting ripped off every time you buy a rechargeable "D" battery from Energizer. It would seem they've got a point. µ

Energizer 2500mah for the same capacity:
D cell costs $12
AA cell costs $3

The adapters cost me about I think I brought a bags of them years ago for £10 but they seem a lot cheaper now.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Size-Battery-Adapter-White-Case/dp/B0092XYLP6

8 AA to D cell adapters for £2.22.
 

Offline OwO

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1250
  • Country: cn
  • RF Engineer.
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #40 on: April 14, 2019, 04:24:29 pm »

Energizer 2500mah for the same capacity:
D cell costs $12
AA cell costs $3
Yeah uh, at $3 you can get 18650 size 3000mAh lithium cells (NCR18650B), I don't know in which part of the world AA/C/D cells are still common. It feels like such a ripoff paying $3 for a small ni-mh that self discharges in a month and holds little energy. Here even flashlights and toys use 18650s.
Email: OwOwOwOwO123@outlook.com
 

Offline SilverSolder

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6126
  • Country: 00
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #41 on: April 14, 2019, 06:19:43 pm »
Here even flashlights and toys use 18650s.

Isn't that a problem when shipping products or travelling by air?
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #42 on: April 14, 2019, 06:23:33 pm »
Yeah uh, at $3 you can get 18650 size 3000mAh lithium cells (NCR18650B), I don't know in which part of the world AA/C/D cells are still common. It feels like such a ripoff paying $3 for a small ni-mh that self discharges in a month and holds little energy. Here even flashlights and toys use 18650s.

AA cells are still used everywhere, I do have some high power flashlights that use 18650s but for the most part I prefer AAs since they're so universal. They don't self discharge rapidly anymore and they don't catch fire if overcharged or get damaged by over-discharging. I have >50 NiMH AA's circulating around my home in various devices.
 

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7000
  • Country: ca
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #43 on: April 14, 2019, 06:30:22 pm »
Dave's Duracell D rated 2,200mAh but "Standard Charge 220mA for 16h" which is 3,520mAh.

NiMh charge acceptance is only 63%?
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16618
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #44 on: April 14, 2019, 10:17:33 pm »
Old news. That has been the case since they first introduced NimH batteries. A true D cell is at least 5000mAh.

Even before NiMH, NiCd batteries were this way too.  The inside cell is actually a standard size sub C.  sub C cells were also used directly in devices where the cells were welded into a pack or permanently connected into a device with a built in charging circuit.  Cordless drills and electric shavers were typical application of sub-C NiCd batteries.  There is a good chance that if you disassemble a 'C" battery you will also find a spacer with a smaller internal cell size.

This has been the rule for consumer grade NiCd D-cells and then NiMH D-cells since the beginning and sellers went to some effort to conceal it by making any capacity markings, if they existed at all, as inconspicuous as possible.  An easy way to identify the crippled D-cells is by weight which is easy enough to distinguish by hand.  If you knew where to look, you could always buy full capacity D-cells at a premium; I used to pick up grey market ones from the battery guy at the TRW amateur radio swap meet and they were glorious to use.

True standard NiCd D-cells are about 4 amp hours and NiMH D-cells are about 8 amp hours.  The fake NiCd D-cells had of course the C-cell capacity of about 1.2 amp hours.  I had not seen the AA and AAA versions but AA to D adapters have been around for a while.

Incidentally, a stack of 10 true NiCd D-cells has no problem starting a car.
 

Offline SilverSolder

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6126
  • Country: 00
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #45 on: April 15, 2019, 01:16:30 pm »
Incidentally, a stack of 10 true NiCd D-cells has no problem starting a car.

150 amps?

I'm pretty sure that one of the reasons for the "fake" cells is -  safety.
 

Offline pereiratech

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: pt
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #46 on: April 15, 2019, 03:22:34 pm »
The Energizer uses ans SUB-C cell an industrial standard used in power tools or emergency light systems.
There are several types of cells, Standard, High discharge rate and High temperature. Each one has it's specific application. Here seems like it's just a standard subc cell with 2500mAh.

http://sub-c-cell-size.rambobattery.com/

;)
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #47 on: April 15, 2019, 03:54:42 pm »
Incidentally, a stack of 10 true NiCd D-cells has no problem starting a car.

150 amps?

I'm pretty sure that one of the reasons for the "fake" cells is -  safety.

It wouldn't do much good, even AA NiCD cells can produce enormous current for a short period, NiMH usually less. It still quite a lot. Back when RC cars used NiCD sub-C packs the guys racing them would drain a pack in <2 minutes, that requires some serious draw.
 

Online ejeffrey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3719
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #48 on: April 15, 2019, 10:05:51 pm »
Incidentally, a stack of 10 true NiCd D-cells has no problem starting a car.

Well, the battery pack for the 1st generation honda insight was just a (taller) stack of NiMH D cells, and that could move the car not just start it despite the higher resistance of the cells vs. NiCd.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16618
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: EEVblog #1200 - BUSTED! - Energizer & Duracell NiMH
« Reply #49 on: April 16, 2019, 01:26:48 am »
Incidentally, a stack of 10 true NiCd D-cells has no problem starting a car.

150 amps?

I'm pretty sure that one of the reasons for the "fake" cells is -  safety.

It wouldn't do much good, even AA NiCD cells can produce enormous current for a short period, NiMH usually less. It still quite a lot. Back when RC cars used NiCD sub-C packs the guys racing them would drain a pack in <2 minutes, that requires some serious draw.

I have had a few fires involving NiCd AA cells.  The cells remained undamaged.

The only reason for the fake cells is cheapness.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf