Option A: Nothing is done and the review stands.
The review will stand. I tested a unit that had crap pulse response, crap trigger jitter, and locked up.
I can fix any errors I made with annotation, but they don't affect my overall opinion of the scope which was based mostly on those 3 major things.
Option B: If Trio is close enough to where Dave is, maybe he could drop by with his camera and repeat the same test on another unit (if available)
Charles is just down the road, he can drop by any time with a replacement.
Although frankly I don't think that many people care for another follow up video?
But if Charles thinks I've done him wrong with my review, I'll happily do it for him.
But the answer is obvious anyway. Fix those 3 issues, well, two actually, the firmware lockup is not major, and it's not a bad little scope for the price bracket.
Would get a resounding thumbs up? No, because there is still too much uncertainly in what scope people are going to get. It is not a proven scope. But it would not get a thumbs down if those things are fixed.
Option D: Someone else repeats the full test on video and Dave provides a link to it in his video.
Everyone is always welcome to post a video repose, the button is right there on Youtube. All approve all on-topic responses even if they are critical of me.