Sorry, I know my opinion can be against many others, but I try to ask for your comprehension.
Plainly, I cannot find this product justifiable in any way.
I do not understand this specific concept: "
Man, in some developing countries this can be an interesting product, for people that can only afford a 7.50$ videocamera".
Sorry guys, but if I was living in those countries, and 7.50$ was "money", I think the least of my worries would be to actually buy a camcorder.
I see it in this way: this product is intended to be sold to people who can afford to waste some money on a cheap, useless toy, which will become nothing more than hazardous waste in a matter of days.
I would not even define it as "cheap camcorder", but "confused attempt to place a product" instead. A true son of consumerism.
Just to be clear, I am not the kind of person that buys the latest iPhone and buys expensive clothes; I always try to find the best value for money, and keep on repairing stuff until I can.
But I truly believe there is a ground level to respect, below which lays the sheer definition of CRAP.
If I was 12, and wished for a "poor man's GoPro", I would save my coins for a little while and search for something cheap as well (come on, if you can save 7.50$, you can wait a little bit more, and save at least 50~60$), but at least worth the money.
My example? I personally bought a used Canon HG10 Full HD camcorder, with all the accessories, for 85$. For 50$ (but even 30$) you can find a lot of nice used stuff, in very good condition!
To turn on the good side, I admit that the engineering effort in producing something so incredibly cheap is noticeable.
I would not be able to reach that level of optimization, that's for sure!
[
Internet rage coming in 3...2...1... ]