I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a vehicle to be up to specification and be safe on the road so I don't see quite what the problem is?
The extra cost when you replace tyres or change wheels twice a year. Plus the side issue of tracking people via the sensors etc.
I'm okay, my car is less than a year old, won't need an MOT for another 3 years and even then it will be summer time, so the wheels with the sensors will be on the car then.
Wasn't to you, was commenting on Ian McD's post about MOT failures for what he incorrectly claimed were optional safety features, I still don't believe it's unreasonable to expect mandatory safety equipment to work and for the car to fail an MOT if it doesn't.
It's pretty easy to buy sensors and have them programmed with a copy of the ID from your original ones if you wish to avoid having to pay Toyota to reprogram the ECU every time as well, they're about £50 each which doesn't seem excessive if you have the money to run a new(ish) car and have a spare set of rims and tyres stored in a shed somewhere.
The other advantage of that is that you have a copy of your data so as and when the TPMS gets damaged by an ape of a tyre fitter you don't need an ECU reprogram, just a clone of the spare sensor in your 'winter' wheels.
As for tracking, I'm absolutely not an advocate of the surveillance state but even so, I'd really not worry about black helicopters monitoring your TPMS to track you, it's far easier to track your mobile, the Bluetooth in the car, or, shock horror, the whopping great big registration plates on the front and back of it with the hundreds of thousands of CCTV and traffic cameras you can drive past.