I agree with you and many of the others but the market is fixated on silly numbers. And odly, somehow, the concensus is that battery life is not an important number.
Battery life isn't hugely important to me in terms of the number of hours' usage I can get from the phone between charges. The only time I ever find myself in danger of running out is when services I'm not using somehow end up remaining enabled, and that's a software problem, not a hardware one.
I do, however, absolutely care about battery life in terms of how many years' service I can get out of a phone before the battery no longer holds a useful charge. I absolutely do want a phone in which I can change the battery when it wears out, but of course, the industry has collectively agreed it's beneficial for manufacturers (not me) if no such option is available.
That's why I'd like to hope that this incident serves as a kick up the arse for the industry. I don't care if the official justification for going back to replaceable batteries is "safety" or "environment" or <insert corporate BS about meeting customer expectations here>. I just care that it happens.