Project to recreate C64. And Atari, And BBC And Spectrum And Apple II....

[mikeselectricstuff]

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/project-bread-bin

Appears to be almost completely clueless.

[sleemanj]

In order to do this I'll need to raise $150,000. I will need to hire a firm to design the electronics and do so in a reasonable amount of time. I will also need to have the case designed too. In doing research on this I've discovered that each prototype that is made will have to be paid for and if you need more than one prototype the costs can add up quite a bit.

Other hidden costs that have shown up are the fees that IndieGoGo will take and what ever the U.S. Government will take in taxes. Also I'll have to pay for help to keep on top of the group of people who have contributed to the campaign so that they will get their perks in a timely and orderly manner.

Allow me to translate for him:

I have no idea what I'm doing, I just thought making a C64 copy would be a good idea when I was walking home from school, 150k is heaps of money right, so that should be enough

[xrunner]

Everyone needs a hobby? 

[sarm]

This project made me 

[pickle9000]

Jeri Ellsworth was involved with or designed a mini box that emulated the c64. Of course that was a commercial product.

[IanB]

I know of the Jeri Ellsworth one. She packaged it in a joystick as I recall. I think a "computer in a joystick" is a cute way to update the "computer in a keyboard" concept, especially if you are going to use it for games.

But it does seem the project is odd. If you want real hardware, why not acquire a used original machine? There must still be plenty of them about in attics and stuff. If you want to recreate one, surely emulations make much more sense these days than reconstructing the hardware?

[EEVblog]

LOL!
When did this campaign start? Only 18 days left and he hasn't cracked $75 yet.
Looks like everyone saw right through this pie-in-the-sky one for a change!

[ivan747]

Haven't people already made replicas of the processors in these computers on FPGAs? Even the legendary Commodore sound chip appears to be recreated.

Even Jeri made her own version of a Commodore. I love her projects, they are quite creative.

[xrunner]

Even Jeri made her own version of a Commodore. I love her projects, they are quite creative.

I subscribed to her You Tube channel but it went dead. The last upload was 4 months ago - Magnetic Logic - Forgotten Technology. I think the company she's working for bans her from any more videos of possible "trade secrets" or something.

[Bored@Work]

Even Jeri made her own version of a Commodore. I love her projects, they are quite creative.

I subscribed to her You Tube channel but it went dead. The last upload was 4 months ago - Magnetic Logic - Forgotten Technology. I think the company she's working for bans her from any more videos of possible "trade secrets" or something.

Wasn't she fired in February and then decided to be self-employed again?

[EEVblog]

I subscribed to her You Tube channel but it went dead. The last upload was 4 months ago - Magnetic Logic - Forgotten Technology. I think the company she's working for bans her from any more videos of possible "trade secrets" or something.

No, she released video while she worked at Valve.
But she got the arse from Valve some months back now and has formed her own startup.
She hasn't released many video because she is busy, both at Valve and now freelance again.

[AndyC_772]

I've discovered that each prototype that is made will have to be paid for

 

I really feel sorry for the engineer who took that particular phone call 

[BigBrother]

My first problem with this crowd funding project is that there's not one prototype being shown (probably why he didn't use KS). The second is the park brackets; the last ones go from 75$ to 5000$.

then...

[EEVblog]

My first problem with this crowd funding project is that there's not one prototype being shown (probably why he didn't use KS).

That's because the guy has absolutely no idea how to build one.

[AlfBaz]

meh... Its been done
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/04/08/commodore-64-welcome-back-old-friend/

[nakchak]

Struggle to see the point of projects like this, especially when the guy admits to having no clue, even the register picked up on the guys lack of knowledge...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/09/retro_tech_fan_seeks_cash_to_clone_c64/

[_Sin]

Note that as this is on indiegogo, and flexibly funded, he will get all the money even if the target isn't reached... so he's already quids in, as its plain that nothing is ever going to come of this that involves him having to actually spend any of it.

[jucole]

meh... Its been done
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/04/08/commodore-64-welcome-back-old-friend/

I think that was just a PC with a commodore slant on the looks.


You can't really beat the Ellsworth C64 DTV joystick; it was the perfect form factor released at the perfect time using the perfect selling platform at the time. 
"QVC purchased the entire first production run of 250,000 units and sold 70,000 of them the first day they were offered"

Is this his utube channel?
https://www.youtube.com/user/dsbiehl/videos?view=0

btw if your spoon breaks, i've got some spare ones here! ;-)

[xrunner]

No, she released video while she worked at Valve.
But she got the arse from Valve some months back now and has formed her own startup.
She hasn't released many video because she is busy, both at Valve and now freelance again.

OK thanks - good to know that.

[Ottomobiehl]

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/project-bread-bin

Appears to be almost completely clueless.

Hi everybody, I'm the "clueless" guy who is behind "Project Bread Bin".

I guess this thing did get publicity but not in the way that I imagined it. Due to all the negative publicity I've went ahead and canceled the fund raiser and refund any monies.

For what it's worth I did this with the intentions of finding a viable, out-of-the-box, affordable replacement for my aging C64 and to contribute something to the retro-computing community. I'd talked to other people who seemed to think this was a good idea.

I also, for what it's worth, I did do my due diligence...to the best of my abilities. What that means is I'm a very amatuer hobbyist electronic enthusiast (my first semi-successful project was building a variant of the x1541 cable) so the my knowledge and resources are limited to trying to reach out to professionals and hoping they'll talk to me. More often than not they said no or didn't respond at all. A lot of roadblocks did pop up when I was in that phase. I had hoped more people would be helpful during this process. I wish I would have known of this site then. It was a case of give up or go on the best you can. Anyway, that's not important.

It's obvious that I was either being naive or had an huge case of hubris (probably a bit of both) when I continued with the project and the stretch goals. To me it would be cool to see a resurgence of all these old 8-bit computers.

Anyway I've canceled the project and given the money back. It was not a scam. In hindsight I probably should have taken some of the resistance I was encountering during the due diligence phase as a sign and not continued on with the project. In hindsight I wish I'd never done the project.

What puzzles me though is that not one person contacted me and said, "interesting project. Seems kind of like a scam though." I wish somebody would have though because I'd probably have asked what parts seemed scammy and some input into how I could have fixed it. My email was posted on the page and there is a messaging function built in too.

I did get email though. I got encouraging email. I got email with suggestions and what they'd like to see in the computer. It was because of this feedback that I continued on with the project.

I didn't even know of the negative criticism (though I'd assumed there would be some) towards the project when I attempted to reach out to Jeri Ellsworth and get some input. Looking for any contact info I came upon her Twitter account and her tweets mocking the project and calling it a scam. I do admire Jeri and look up to her so those tweets were crushing to say the least. A little more research lead me to this site and this forum post. Reading it didn't life my spirits either.

I wasn't aware of the Register article and I have not read it yet. I'm almost afraid to now. Also, to the user that pointed out my YouTube channel. Yes it is my channel and I'm not sure what the "broken spoons" thing means. I'm assuming you don't like my channel or, perhaps, me.

Finally I just wanted to say I'm sorry about the whole affair. I'm sorry if anybody was hurt or offended. That was not my intention. I'm sorry nobody tried to contact me and show me the errors of my way. Greatly appreciated. I'm sorry I attempted the project in the first place. I didn't enjoy the accusations and ridicule that went along with doing this project. Finally, I'm sorry I didn't know about this site sooner. There are a bunch of you who seem to have a better head on their shoulder about this stuff than I do. You'd have been a valuable resource.

Thank you for your time,
Dan

[tom66]

I mean, you've got the Raspberry Pi available now, a $25/$35 computer, which is capable of emulating a lot of machines with a 700MHz ARM and powerful GPU. I'd expect it could do most of those no problems. Attach a keyboard (perhaps take an old C64 or AppleII to pieces  )  and give it a HDMI monitor and you're done. I don't see the point of this project at all.

[Ottomobiehl]

I mean, you've got the Raspberry Pi available now, a $25/$35 computer, which is capable of emulating a lot of machines with a 700MHz ARM and powerful GPU. I'd expect it could do most of those no problems. Attach a keyboard (perhaps take an old C64 or AppleII to pieces  )  and give it a HDMI monitor and you're done. I don't see the point of this project at all.

Since many people (myself included) don't have the technical skill to put something like that together. It was my intent to produce something that would work for them out of the box. That was my main point of the project.

That being said I wish I would have knew more about those capabilities of the Raspberry Pi sooner. I knew about the Raspberry Pi but I didn't think to put one and one together. Tunnel vision I guess. I suppose if I'd known I would have gone that route instead.

An aside: I would have a very hard time tearing my c64 apart to use the keyboard on another project. That old machine is dear to me.

[AndyC_772]

Dan

The reason you've got such a roasting is very simple: you were asking for money. A *lot* of money.

As soon as you do that, you're making it clear that you're not messing about, you have a real commercially viable project and a very good chance of bringing it to market. It's your responsibility to make sure you're in that position, and you need to do your homework really, really thoroughly *before* you ask anyone to stump up their own hard-earned cash.

I'm afraid the reason you got so little help from professional engineers you spoke to, is that they're experienced enough to spot the difference between a commercially viable job that's worth investing time and effort in, and something so unlikely to ever see the light of day that it's not worth it. Bear in mind that whilst people on forums might be only too happy to give you the benefit of their time and advice for free, for a professional engineer time is money. You'll find them much more co-operative once you can show that you have a realistic commercial proposition.

What you need to do is take a step back, abandon any idea of making a commercial product for now, and start asking the right questions. Ask people what's actually involved in developing a saleable product, what the real difficulties and costs are, how long things take and what information you need to gather.

For what it's worth, I grew up with 8 bit home computers, and I like them. I have a BBC micro - but I bought it off Ebay for next to nothing, and it sits in a cupboard unused 99.9% of the time. I don't see a market for a modern copy of something I can easily buy a real example of, but I'm prepared to be proved wrong. Emphasis on "proved".

[mikeselectricstuff]

I don't think anyone seriously thought it was a scam - just hopelessly unrealistic.

[Ottomobiehl]

Dan

The reason you've got such a roasting is very simple: you were asking for money. A *lot* of money.

As soon as you do that, you're making it clear that you're not messing about, you have a real commercially viable project and a very good chance of bringing it to market. It's your responsibility to make sure you're in that position, and you need to do your homework really, really thoroughly *before* you ask anyone to stump up their own hard-earned cash.

I'm afraid the reason you got so little help from professional engineers you spoke to, is that they're experienced enough to spot the difference between a commercially viable job that's worth investing time and effort in, and something so unlikely to ever see the light of day that it's not worth it. Bear in mind that whilst people on forums might be only too happy to give you the benefit of their time and advice for free, for a professional engineer time is money. You'll find them much more co-operative once you can show that you have a realistic commercial proposition.

What you need to do is take a step back, abandon any idea of making a commercial product for now, and start asking the right questions. Ask people what's actually involved in developing a saleable product, what the real difficulties and costs are, how long things take and what information you need to gather.

For what it's worth, I grew up with 8 bit home computers, and I like them. I have a BBC micro - but I bought it off Ebay for next to nothing, and it sits in a cupboard unused 99.9% of the time. I don't see a market for a modern copy of something I can easily buy a real example of, but I'm prepared to be proved wrong. Emphasis on "proved".

Fair enough and understandable. The reality is that'll it'll probably be a long time, if ever, before I try something like this again.

I don't think anyone seriously thought it was a scam - just hopelessly unrealistic.

QFT.

I have been known to be overly optimistic about stuff before. I think in this case I was misguided by it and it bit me in the arse.

[FrankBuss]

I didn't even know of the negative criticism (though I'd assumed there would be some) towards the project when I attempted to reach out to Jeri Ellsworth and get some input. Looking for any contact info I came upon her Twitter account and her tweets mocking the project and calling it a scam. I do admire Jeri and look up to her so those tweets were crushing to say the least. A little more research lead me to this site and this forum post. Reading it didn't life my spirits either.

Don't take it personal. Engineers are not politicians and they say what they think.

Some red flags in your campaign were "I don't have the technical skills" and you didn't demonstrate in your campaign that you have done some research how much it costs to hire a company to do it for you, just wishing it should cost $75. I guess only recreating the old keyboard would cost 5 digits in tooling and design cost. And if you don't sell at least thousands of it, the price of each one will be too much to be in the limit for your desired system price.
Another point is the hardware compatibility. "Being able to use peripherals built for the machine" would make it even more costly, because just trying to 100% implement the behavior of the expansion port of this old computer is a mess.

Finally a 100% backward compatible C64 would be very difficult, with the VIC as the most difficult part. The best implementation I know so far is used in the Turbo Chameleon, and just the module, without keyboard or docking station, costs EUR 200. Take a look at their mailing list and read about the problems they have, and they are developing it for at least 5 years now (this is when the Yahoo group was created). For the C64 DTV they just patched the bundled games until they worked

That said, with a Raspberry Pi it might be possible to create a cheap solution, of course, not external hardware compatibility, but most people want to run the software only anyway. I've tested it a year ago: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=148184 and someone has created a full C64 with it: http://retrotext.blogspot.de/2012/06/its-complete-post-is-coming-soon.html I would recommend that you try to rebuild this, because this would help you to understand some of the problems that arise when you try to build something more difficult. The blog entry is very detailed and should be no problem. You don't have to use a working C64 for the keyboard, buy a broken one from eBay.

When you have a working prototype, you could ask manufactures for the keyboard and the case, and the Raspberry Pi foundation if they can deliver you the required many Raspis. Then start a new foundraising, if you have all the numbers, and don't use a flexible goal, because you can't pay the tooling and other setup costs from it. Maybe even easier would be to use a PC keyboard (you don't need that often the keyboard for gaming on the C64) and some laser cutted parts for the case. This would reduce the required number of units to make it cheap.

[sarm]

You should take a look to 2 great videos of Dave about printed circuit boards:
EEVblog #127 - PCB Design For Manufacture Tutorial - Part 1 http://youtu.be/VXE_dh38HjU
EEVblog #239 - PCB Design For Manufacture Part 2 http://youtu.be/Uemr8xaxcw0

[pickle9000]

Have a look at these handheld games from china, they are android or emulators for most of the popular systems. Read the fine print find gameboy, atari aand so on.

http://dx.com/c/video-games-699/other-game-consoles-610

[sarm]

EEVblog #72 - Let's Design a Product http://youtu.be/g7b5YZENvjY

[tom66]

If you wanted an "easier" project, I'd say start with perhaps a kit for building in a Pi to one of those C64 cases. You may be able to get a similar looking keyboard with custom keycaps made, although, I don't think this would be cheap, it would be cheaper than completely remaking a C64.

[Ottomobiehl]

I just wanted to say thank you for the insight, links and the attempts to gently nudge me in the right direction. I have been watching the videos and reading the blog posts/forum posts. I do believe I've learned more from spending a couple of hours watching those videos and pursuing this site than I did in the months of trying to contact people/companies leading up to my fiasco.

As far as a project I think I'm just going to order one of those 6502 compatible CPUs from Western Design Center and start playing around with that. Making it strobe an LED for example.

[EEVblog]

What puzzles me though is that not one person contacted me and said, "interesting project. Seems kind of like a scam though." I wish somebody would have though because I'd probably have asked what parts seemed scammy and some input into how I could have fixed it. My email was posted on the page and there is a messaging function built in too.

Sorry, but you put your butt on the line in public, and it got discussed in public based on your public content, that's how the world works. Lesson learned.
You can't expect everyone to privately email you and clarify everything before commenting.

To most hardware experienced people it was obvious that it wasn't a scam (and I'm sure that would be the same for Jeri too, and she didn't mean scam as in deliberate fraud). You were simply an enthusiastic amateur that didn't know what's involved in producing and delivering something like this.
 

Finally I just wanted to say I'm sorry about the whole affair. I'm sorry if anybody was hurt or offended. That was not my intention.

Don't apologise. You tried, which is more than most people do!
And you also had the good sense to pull the project, and did the right thing refunding the money.
And you learned some stuff, so it's a win 

[jucole]

Also, to the user that pointed out my YouTube channel. Yes it is my channel and I'm not sure what the "broken spoons" thing means. I'm assuming you don't like my channel or, perhaps, me.

Hi Dan,  thanks for your honest posts;  my comment joke was only about your project idea; and the fact you were asking a lot of money, it was in no way about you personally or your channel.

You made a mistake, so what, in a few weeks no-one will care anyway; so don't let any of these negative comments get you down or put you off your ideas and dreams!    I'd love to see a raspberry pi running a port of winVice inside a real C64 case with a real C64 keyboard.      Also CC65 is a pretty nice C compiler specifically if you wanted to play with programming the 6510 or 6502 chips without doing too much assembly.  http://www.cc65.org/

and welcome to the forum

[Ottomobiehl]

Sorry, but you put your butt on the line in public, and it got discussed in public based on your public content, that's how the world works. Lesson learned.
You can't expect everyone to privately email you and clarify everything before commenting.

To most hardware experienced people it was obvious that it wasn't a scam (and I'm sure that would be the same for Jeri too, and she didn't mean scam as in deliberate fraud). You were simply an enthusiastic amateur that didn't know what's involved in producing and delivering something like this.

Fair enough. I did put my butt out there and I guess I do deserve the arse chewing I got.
 

Don't apologise. You tried, which is more than most people do!
And you also had the good sense to pull the project, and did the right thing refunding the money.
And you learned some stuff, so it's a win 

I do appreciate the kind words and encouragement. I've read a lot of unkind things today from many different people at many different groups around the Internet. For a while I felt as if most people on the Internet disliked me. Made me want to hide under a rock in some remote location. Very disheartening indeed.

Hi Dan,  thanks for your honest posts;  my comment joke was only about your project idea; and the fact you were asking a lot of money, it was in no way about you personally or your channel.

You made a mistake, so what, in a few weeks no-one will care anyway; so don't let any of these negative comments get you down or put you off your ideas and dreams!    I'd love to see a raspberry pi running a port of winVice inside a real C64 case with a real C64 keyboard.      Also CC65 is a pretty nice C compiler specifically if you wanted to play with programming the 6510 or 6502 chips without doing too much assembly.  http://www.cc65.org/

and welcome to the forum

Thanks for the clarifications and no hard feelings.

Several people have mentioned the Raspberry Pi idea to me and the more I think about it the more I like the idea.

Also, I appreciate the link to the CC65 compiler as I've not heard of it. I'll have to download and play around with it a bit. I do enjoy messing around with that kind of stuff. Fortunately I know a little bit of 6502 assembly and have used the Acme cross-compiler for a few personal projects.

[JoannaK]

Hi Ottomobiehl.

In a way, you should consider yourself lucky. If you had managed to get project funded and *then* run into all those problems expected, it would have been a lot worse situation. With this, you got some good experience, didn't lose money nor ruined your name at public. Not to mention the fact you found yourself a new forum where to ask some help in the future.

I know that people like Jeri, Mike, Dave etc can sound a bit harash at time, but you have to understand that these are the things they (and I) do for living. And with decade (or two) experience of various projects, daydreams and failures one kinda learns to see and evaluate these things.

[Sionyn]

snooty soldering-iron wielders on electronics forums, the cheek or it
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/10/ellsworth_tweet_prompts_bread_bin_cancellation/

[Ottomobiehl]

snooty soldering-iron wielders on electronics forums, the cheek or it
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/10/ellsworth_tweet_prompts_bread_bin_cancellation/

Ouch! You guys seem to be caught in the peripheral of any press this thing is getting. I'm sorry about that.

[Bored@Work]

snooty soldering-iron wielders on electronics forums, the cheek or it
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/10/ellsworth_tweet_prompts_bread_bin_cancellation/

Ouch! You guys seem to be caught in the peripheral of any press this thing is getting. I'm sorry about that.

Oh come on,

snooty soldering-iron wielders on electronics forums

is actually funny. We are calling each other far less funny things occasionally.

[JoannaK]

As a somewhat related idea. I noticed this couple days old Tweet from Jeri:

Jeri Ellsworth ?@jeriellsworth 9 May

@kgagne Haha. They should've reached out to me, because I have 100k c64 dtv chips.

Makes me wonder how hard it acually would be for us hobbyists to use some of those chips for something? IIRC her design was quite compatible with a real C64 and even had some hackable IO ports???

[Corporate666]

Hi everybody, I'm the "clueless" guy who is behind "Project Bread Bin".

Dan,

I've started various businesses over the past 15 years, from dot.com's with lots of venture capital funding, to bootstrapped startups.

Here is the thing you need to appreciate and take away from all of this - you violated one of the MOST IMPORTANT rules of asking for investment, which is that you MUST respect the seriousness of people giving you their hard earned money to do something for them.  You were not qualified to take on this project, you did not do your due diligence, you did not mitigate risk, or have a solid business plan, or do much research, or invest your own time and money before asking others to give you theirs.  You had a dream and wanted other people to fund it. 

The *only* difference between your actions and that of a genuine scammer who has no intention of doing anything but collecting the money is that you are naive about what you were doing.  But that is the same difference between someone who causes a bus load of people to die because he forgot to do the maintenance on the bus, and someone who didn't care about doing the maintenance because he just didn't want to spend the money.  If the bus crashes and the people are all dead, does it really matter if you "didn't mean to" do it?

I'm not trying to bash you - I hope you will learn to respect the seriousness of taking money from people - whether it be in employment or for projects like this.  It is a very solemn responsibility and if you are not the one with the most to lose on the line, you really have no business asking others to put their money in.

[FrankBuss]

As a somewhat related idea. I noticed this couple days old Tweet from Jeri:

Jeri Ellsworth ?@jeriellsworth 9 May

@kgagne Haha. They should've reached out to me, because I have 100k c64 dtv chips.

Makes me wonder how hard it acually would be for us hobbyists to use some of those chips for something? IIRC her design was quite compatible with a real C64 and even had some hackable IO ports???

Should be possible. But Jeri's chips are not bonded, they are just the dies. But maybe it will be not too expensive to bond them, if enough people wants to buy a chip. Maybe a new Kickstarter project?

[justanothercanuck]

I think I said this in another thread, but the original consoles/microcomputers are still fairly cheap that it's probably cheaper to buy them instead of recreating them in FPGA/etc.  Just throwing it out there... 

[EEVblog]

I'm not trying to bash you - I hope you will learn to respect the seriousness of taking money from people - whether it be in employment or for projects like this.  It is a very solemn responsibility and if you are not the one with the most to lose on the line, you really have no business asking others to put their money in.

Yes indeed, taking other people's money is serious business, and I have always avoided that at all costs.
However, I have decided to try crowd funding for my next project and I hope to get that up and running in the coming weeks.
What will I have to show the "investors"? Not only a fully working and finished prototype, but the production PCB panel already made. I've put up the money for all that. All that is left is to buy the bulk parts from Digikey and ship to the assembler - job done. Practically zero risk for all involved.
I couldn't image offering up a project were I do not have at least have a fully working prototype. The odds of failure and/or extremely late delivery are almost even money.
IMO, if you can't fund a prototype yourself to prove the concept and show, you should not be allowed to crowd source anything.
Kickstarter agree and have that new rule. No prototype. no campaign.

[EEVblog]

In a way, you should consider yourself lucky. If you had managed to get project funded and *then* run into all those problems expected, it would have been a lot worse situation. With this, you got some good experience, didn't lose money nor ruined your name at public. Not to mention the fact you found yourself a new forum where to ask some help in the future.

In fact, he's made a name for himself!
His next campaign can start "From that enthusiastic guy that tried to bring back the C64!"
As I said before, that's more than most anonymous armchair ranters can claim.

[mikeselectricstuff]

As a somewhat related idea. I noticed this couple days old Tweet from Jeri:

Jeri Ellsworth ?@jeriellsworth 9 May

@kgagne Haha. They should've reached out to me, because I have 100k c64 dtv chips.

Makes me wonder how hard it acually would be for us hobbyists to use some of those chips for something? IIRC her design was quite compatible with a real C64 and even had some hackable IO ports???

Should be possible. But Jeri's chips are not bonded, they are just the dies. But maybe it will be not too expensive to bond them, if enough people wants to buy a chip. Maybe a new Kickstarter project?

Although a kickstarter to get some boards made and chips bonded would undoubtedly be popular, I suspect a major issue here is that she probably doesn't have rights  to the games, which AIUI were modified from the original versions to work on the new hardware, so it wouldn't be quite as simple to get something that was useable. However if at least some of the software suppliers could be got involved  for a percentage, that could work.

[Corporate666]

I'm not trying to bash you - I hope you will learn to respect the seriousness of taking money from people - whether it be in employment or for projects like this.  It is a very solemn responsibility and if you are not the one with the most to lose on the line, you really have no business asking others to put their money in.

Yes indeed, taking other people's money is serious business, and I have always avoided that at all costs.
However, I have decided to try crowd funding for my next project and I hope to get that up and running in the coming weeks.
What will I have to show the "investors"? Not only a fully working and finished prototype, but the production PCB panel already made. I've put up the money for all that. All that is left is to buy the bulk parts from Digikey and ship to the assembler - job done. Practically zero risk for all involved.
I couldn't image offering up a project were I do not have at least have a fully working prototype. The odds of failure and/or extremely late delivery are almost even money.
IMO, if you can't fund a prototype yourself to prove the concept and show, you should not be allowed to crowd source anything.
Kickstarter agree and have that new rule. No prototype. no campaign.

I think you also have a reputation that precedes you and based on your knowledge (and since I believe you already run a business), people would and should feel comfortable investing, even if you didn't have all of the pieces already in place.  I am very curious what your project is and I hope you will let us know about it because I would certainly like to participate in the funding - would be cool and fun!

The C64 project reminds me of the group my dad called me excitedly about some years back... they were looking for investors and were going to buy up land in Texas and mine it for oil.  That fell through because of mineral rights issues (lack of DD really), and their fallback plan was investing in Venezuelan offshore oil drilling platforms that made sweet crude the USA bought. I think that announcement was about the last communication my dad got - it was some months later he realized his $10,000 of fools money was gone forever.

As far as Kickstarter... one thing I would caution you about - I think everyone realizes that Kickstarter is really just a place to take pre-orders so one can get volume discounts on parts and not so much about actually funding the R&D of a thing anymore.  I decided to launch a project on there and I emphasized the "we're pretty much ready to go - we just need your $$$ to buy enough volumes of parts to make it happen".  My project was declined because it did "not meet the guidelines", which apparently included the fact that you actually do need the money.

I didn't really need the $$ to make my project a reality.  I doubt you do either.  I just wanted to pre-sell $100k worth of my stuff (and get paid for it!) before I had to make it. 

So I'd suggest not being too overt about the "we're all done, just need to buy volumes of parts" in the video, or you could face the Kickstarter hammer

Please post your project when it is live.

[amyk]

Finally a 100% backward compatible C64 would be very difficult, with the VIC as the most difficult part.

FYI the Visual6502 project has decapped one to reverse-engineer, although won't be done anytime soon probably.
http://visual6502.org/images/pages/Commodore_8565_die_shots.html

[EEVblog]

I think you also have a reputation that precedes you and based on your knowledge (and since I believe you already run a business), people would and should feel comfortable investing, even if you didn't have all of the pieces already in place.

I also have a lot more to lose than most in terms of name!

I am very curious what your project is and I hope you will let us know about it because I would certainly like to participate in the funding - would be cool and fun!

Sorry, nothing exciting. In fact it's positively boring and familiar I'm afraid. But it's something to try the whole crowd source thing with.

I didn't really need the $$ to make my project a reality.  I doubt you do either.  I just wanted to pre-sell $100k worth of my stuff (and get paid for it!) before I had to make it. 
So I'd suggest not being too overt about the "we're all done, just need to buy volumes of parts" in the video, or you could face the Kickstarter hammer

I can't use Kickstarter, I'm not a Yank, or a Pom.
I will be using Pozzible.
Yes, I don't need crowd funding. I can simply take the money out of the home loan and do whatever size run I like, like I always have. But it has the usual risk.
I could do pre-sales on my website to find out what numbers I need to produce, but I like the "meet the target or no charge" role of the crowd funding platforms.

I don't understand why Kickstarter has that silly rule, which is broken with a lot of projects anyway. Wouldn't people in our situation (paid for everything already except production) provide almost a "sure thing" for them? 
The person who can't pay for production is essentially no different to the person who can't pay for the prototype.

[FrankBuss]

I am very curious what your project is and I hope you will let us know about it because I would certainly like to participate in the funding - would be cool and fun!

Sorry, nothing exciting. In fact it's positively boring and familiar I'm afraid. But it's something to try the whole crowd source thing with.

Is it your USB power supply?

I don't understand why Kickstarter has that silly rule, which is broken with a lot of projects anyway. Wouldn't people in our situation (paid for everything already except production) provide almost a "sure thing" for them? 
The person who can't pay for production is essentially no different to the person who can't pay for the prototype.

I like the prototype rule. Usually a prototype is much less expensive than the production, if you build it with flying wires, hot glue etc., as a fun project in your spare time. It avoids scams and unrealistic projects.

[EEVblog]

I like the prototype rule. Usually a prototype is much less expensive than the production, if you build it with flying wires, hot glue etc., as a fun project in your spare time. It avoids scams and unrealistic projects.

That depends entirely on how close the prototype is to the real production item.
In my case it's practically the same. The only difference is I hand soldered the first (pre) production panel instead of a machine doing it.
In the case of say a C64 prototype on a ratsnest veroboard, it's streets (and maybe a few hundred K$) away from a finished market ready computer you can ship.

[EEVblog]

Is it your USB power supply?

Nope!

[TerminalJack505]

Golden Platypussy?  Sounds James Bond-ish.  Is this some sort of high tech spy equipment?

[FrankBuss]

I guess the platypus is a hallmark for Australia, because it lives there (and with an US family in one of my favorite cartoon series). The gold plating can be useful for BGAs, but on the photo it really looks like bragging .

[JoannaK]

Finally a 100% backward compatible C64 would be very difficult, with the VIC as the most difficult part.

FYI the Visual6502 project has decapped one to reverse-engineer, although won't be done anytime soon probably.
http://visual6502.org/images/pages/Commodore_8565_die_shots.html

VIC is indeed quite difficult. There are some interesting interactions with VIC and CPU at the C64 hardware and the demo coders tend to mis-use those really well. Muxin sprites, openng borders, expanding gfx up/down, some special modes (Fld) and the Display-hw cycle stealing are hard to emulate with 100% correctly.

For those who have interest.. this seems to be quite a good intro
http://www.cebix.net/VIC-Article.txt

Yeah.. I know I'm old. C64 was my first own computer and also the first machine I made some code for money. Oh, if I had back then only known half of the things I have later forgotten ...   

[FrankBuss]

And 100% SID compatibility would be difficult, too. Some years ago an effect was developed, which can play 4 channels of 8-bit samplerate, 2 channels of SID synth sound and all filtered:

Of course, it doesn't work in VICE.

And there are still unsolved mysteries. One was just explained this year by lft, why on some machines the VSP effect crashes, an interesting analog metastability effect: http://www.linusakesson.net/scene/safevsp/index.php

[justanothercanuck]

Of course, it doesn't work in VICE.

worked fine for me, albeit without video.  it sounded identical to the video as well...  in fact, the video says it should play on vice. 

[FrankBuss]

You are right, I've tested it with VICE 2.2, looks like they have improved it, it works without problems with VICE 2.4 (and the re-SID setting). But no video.

[Dennis FK]

meh... Its been done
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/04/08/commodore-64-welcome-back-old-friend/

I think that was just a PC with a commodore slant on the looks.


You can't really beat the Ellsworth C64 DTV joystick; it was the perfect form factor released at the perfect time using the perfect selling platform at the time. 
"QVC purchased the entire first production run of 250,000 units and sold 70,000 of them the first day they were offered"

Is this his utube channel?
https://www.youtube.com/user/dsbiehl/videos?view=0

btw if your spoon breaks, i've got some spare ones here! ;-)

I'm sure I read somewhere that she (jeri) was contacted by Commodore USA to do some work (I guess on the C=64 part )

[dexters_lab]

Is it your USB power supply?

Nope!

Spandau Ballet?

[Stonent]

Haven't people already made replicas of the processors in these computers on FPGAs? Even the legendary Commodore sound chip appears to be recreated.

Even Jeri made her own version of a Commodore. I love her projects, they are quite creative.

There are AVR based SID emulators. One even sits on a tiny circuit board that is plug compatible with the original SID chip.