Author Topic: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?  (Read 484061 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jay_Diddy_B

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2733
  • Country: ca
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #425 on: June 14, 2013, 08:25:05 am »
Hi,

I think we could help them out with their updates by recycling some of the comments from earlier ones. We could probably make a reasonable guess at what the next update is going to be.

It will probably start with:

I apologize for being late with the update but we had a busy weekend. (On the TV show 'Dragon's Den, the Dragons tend to steer clear of people who have day jobs because they are not 100% committed to their ideas).

Then it will follow:
The new reflow oven has arrived, but problems with the temperature profile caused our prototype boards to be destroyed. We now waiting for a new batch of boards to be delivered. (If they had someone who has built boards before, they would know that you can solder boards in a $40-80 toaster oven, using a thermocouple to monitor the temperature)

We have further refined the case and we are having new molds made.

The GUI has been further improved so I can now show you some thermal images (from a high resolution commercial camera or images we took through our office window and colored them in. I have lots of CGI/VFX experience from my day job)

We are happy to show you pictures of the GUI.

I would like to show you pictures of the camera and the PCB but NDAs with our key supplier prevent me from being able to do this.

We  expect to be shipping cameras in a few weeks.

We continue to have interest from major resellers.

Thank you for your patience.


Usual disclaimers apply. Any resemblance to reality is a coincidence.


 :D


Jay_Diddy_B

 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13736
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #426 on: June 14, 2013, 08:32:28 am »
Apparently the IR-Blue is actually shipping to backers: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/andyrawson/ir-blue-thermal-imaging-smartphone-accessory/posts/502053

That might mean that there is a shred of possibility of mu optics pulling through (however, very unlikely).

The two are completely unconnected. IR-Blue was clearly a realistic product based on an available part based on established technology.
There is NO available sensor that meets mu's spec/price point. If there was, someone more competent would be on the market with it already.
And there's no way that a manufacturer of any new & innovative sensor would (still) be granting idiots like mu any exclusivity on it.
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #427 on: June 14, 2013, 11:05:10 am »
There is NO available sensor that meets mu's spec/price point. If there was, someone more competent would be on the market with it already.
And there's no way that a manufacturer of any new & innovative sensor would (still) be granting idiots like mu any exclusivity on it.

And that's the trick. They have backed themselves into a corner by stating very clearly
Quote
The imager we’re using now is of the highest quality and has been in the market for some time.
That makes the sensor non-exclusive and essentially "off the shelf".
So based on their banner claim for the resolution of 160x120, that means if all this is true, a quality 160x120 thermal sensor has existed on the market for "some time" (and that claim was already made one month ago). Yet no one has a cheap 160x120 thermal meter on the marker at anywhere close to what Mu claim they can sell it at, nor is there any news of anyone even working on one. Nor can a host of inquisitive technical people who are backing and following this project find one.
Even if the sensor alone cost half of Mu's retail asking price (minus lens and everything else), such a cheap sensor would have caused a huge stir in the market and you'd have a dozen companies and hackers everywhere working on it. And "some time" is more than enough time for a hacker show something. Heck, a week would be enough.
So I can't see any way in which that claim can be true  :-//
« Last Edit: June 14, 2013, 11:07:24 am by EEVblog »
 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13736
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #428 on: June 14, 2013, 11:52:18 am »
such a cheap sensor would have caused a huge stir in the market and you'd have a dozen companies and hackers everywhere working on it.
Probably not hackers - due to export controls, manufacturers of these sensors are somewhat cautious about who they deal with. You won't see them in Digikey any time soon. 
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline uprightsquire

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 45
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #429 on: June 14, 2013, 11:57:25 am »
What kind of nefarious fun are the export controls trying to stop?
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #430 on: June 14, 2013, 12:03:25 pm »
Probably not hackers - due to export controls, manufacturers of these sensors are somewhat cautious about who they deal with. You won't see them in Digikey any time soon.

True, but not if the sensor isn't from the land of Uncle Sam.
 

Offline AndyC_772

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4223
  • Country: gb
  • Professional design engineer
    • Cawte Engineering | Reliable Electronics
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #431 on: June 14, 2013, 12:04:53 pm »
What kind of nefarious fun are the export controls trying to stop?
Heat seeking missiles, probably.

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #432 on: June 14, 2013, 12:10:34 pm »
What kind of nefarious fun are the export controls trying to stop?

The US paranoid delusional kind  ::)
Like you can't buy certain really fast trannies and other parts, because they could be used in an implosion nuke.
Heck, they even tried to export control the Playsation 2 because it might be used for nuke design:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/review/061399china-chips-review.html

 

Offline cyr

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 252
  • Country: se
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #433 on: June 14, 2013, 12:10:56 pm »
The military kind generally.

It's pretty hard to hide tanks and stuff from high quality thermal cameras.

Not impossible though:

 

Offline suoixon

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #435 on: June 14, 2013, 01:10:44 pm »
Wouldn't you say that the specs of this unit
http://www.pce-instruments.com/deutsch/messtechnik-im-online-handel/messgeraete-fuer-alle-parameter/waermebildkamera-pce-holding-gmbh-waermebildkamera-pce-tc-31-det_387592.htm?_list=qr.art&_listpos=1
is very similar to the Muoptics claimed specs?

Yes, I sure someone has already mentioned that way back, and I think one of the backers said it was likely the commercial one used in their promo shots.
 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13736
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #436 on: June 14, 2013, 01:10:59 pm »
Probably not hackers - due to export controls, manufacturers of these sensors are somewhat cautious about who they deal with. You won't see them in Digikey any time soon.

True, but not if the sensor isn't from the land of Uncle Sam.
Most other countries have export restrictions of some kind, so the situation is probably similar wherever things are made. And even if not, any manufacturer would not want to risk being barred from the US market, or having supplies of critical parts or materials for letting potential baddies have access to thermal imaging on their i-phones.
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline sleemanj

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3024
  • Country: nz
  • Professional tightwad.
    • The electronics hobby components I sell.
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #437 on: June 14, 2013, 02:19:02 pm »
Gotta wonder since everything is so secret if the shipping letter would go something like...

"Congratulations on your purchase of this world beating IR camera.  We are sure you will have many great years knowing that you own the best IR camera out there, thanks for your support which allowed us to develop this amazing camera!.  Naturally due to our many partner companies and the NDAs we have in place you can't see, touch or use it, so we have welded it into this steel box filled with the highest quality lead for your convenience!"
~~~
EEVBlog Members - get yourself 10% discount off all my electronic components for sale just use the Buy Direct links and use Coupon Code "eevblog" during checkout.  Shipping from New Zealand, international orders welcome :-)
 

Offline CanadianAvenger

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 179
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #438 on: June 14, 2013, 03:23:08 pm »

Yes, I sure someone has already mentioned that way back, and I think one of the backers said it was likely the commercial one used in their promo shots.

Actually the promo shots are at a higher resolution. Images with 3 different resolutions were posted [600x456, 279x214, 178x178]
 

Offline Rasz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2616
  • Country: 00
    • My random blog.
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #439 on: June 14, 2013, 04:44:25 pm »
Export controls might be their end game
-supplier refused to  ship us parts because we dont have super secrut clearance
-we shipped units to backers, but super secrut export police confiscated them

I still think it will be something more mundane
-warehouse fire
-main dev died with only copy of device plans and prototype in plane crash
Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
My fireplace is on fire, but in all the wrong places.
 

Offline tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6693
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #440 on: June 14, 2013, 05:53:52 pm »
Sadly, I reckon it'll be the same as most other crowdsourced projects... a slow, tapering off of updates, before completely stopping. 
 

Offline MacAttak

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 683
  • Country: us
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #441 on: June 14, 2013, 09:53:42 pm »
They still haven't played the "Men in black suits raided our research office" card, or the "John's Mother/Brother/Westie underwent radiation therapy and he had to take some time off to care for them". Nor have they tried the "PayPal froze our assets" card.

Still many more rounds to go in this dance.


Oh, and I agree that this is entirely different from the IR-Blue project. But I am going to bet that the majority of the 1900 backers of mu thermal don't understand that, or refuse to accept it. They will see that "well, this other heat-picture-making-gizmo was able to be made and delivered for even cheaper than this one" without realizing that it isn't a fair comparison beyond the most superficial level.
 

Offline dustout

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 24
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #442 on: June 18, 2013, 01:32:29 am »
"Hello All,

I thought that I’d go through and answer a few technical questions that have recently been asked.

Sensor -
We are using a 160×120 Microbolometer for infrared sensing. I’m sure most of you know what these sensors are, but here is the down and dirty wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microbolometer

Video Stream -
The data stream going from the camera to the host device is entirely raw data. That data is processed into video in the Mu App. By doing all of the processing in the app, we can push updates related to video without requiring hardware firmware updates.

Firmware -
That being said, the cameras will be firmware upgradable. JTAG, USB, and possibly OTA updates will be possible, however we will likely only support USB with the firmware that ships on the cameras. We will later release new firmwares that will enable the other update methods.

Open Source -
Although we haven’t settled on how much of the software and the project will be open sourced, we do want to enable the community to make interesting hacks and to expand the software to smaller or more niche platforms.

Cheers!
MuOptics"
 

Offline Pentode

  • Contributor
  • !
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: 00
  • User is banned.
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #443 on: June 18, 2013, 07:35:17 am »
Yeah....right.....whatEVER!!!! :-DD
 

Offline jubaowan

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #444 on: June 18, 2013, 07:39:46 am »
if Thermal Imager product became very cheap, isnot good things?
 

Offline AlfBaz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2184
  • Country: au
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #445 on: June 18, 2013, 08:00:55 am »
I'm building an electric train, that being said I'm providing an efficient furnace for steam generation  :palm:
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #446 on: June 18, 2013, 09:40:22 am »
if Thermal Imager product became very cheap, isnot good things?

Yes, but these guys (who have no experience in the industry) have absolutely no say in that what so ever.
They claim they are using an off-the-shelf 160x120 microbolometer that has been on the market for "some time".
If that is true, at an affordable price, then many companies would have products on the market already.
These guys don't have the volume to influence anything in the market.
 

Offline MFX

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 93
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #447 on: June 18, 2013, 08:55:45 pm »
BTW on the export restrictions point this map http://www.infraredcamerasinc.com/Export_license.html  suggests there are no restrictions for much of Europe/Australia/some other countries on imagers up to 384 x 288 .

Martin.
 

Offline tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6693
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #448 on: June 19, 2013, 09:25:34 pm »
On a recent update:
Quote
That being said, the cameras will be firmware upgradable. JTAG, USB, and possibly OTA updates will be possible, however we will likely only support USB with the firmware that ships on the cameras. We will later release new firmwares that will enable the other update methods.

How can you not support JTAG? I was under the impression that firmware installed has nothing to do with it -- other than perhaps an option to permanently disable the JTAG interface after production, to effectively create an OTP device.
 

Offline Hypernova

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Country: tw
Re: Mµ Thermal Imager - real or fake?
« Reply #449 on: June 21, 2013, 03:52:02 am »
They are just throwing around keywords they see on some random MCU datasheet.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf