1
Test Equipment / Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Last post by Fungus on Today at 02:32:59 pm »On the DHO800/900, with only 312 MSa/s per channel, you will be out of luck.
Yes, we know sampling theory, thanks...
On the DHO800/900, with only 312 MSa/s per channel, you will be out of luck.
when triying to use the mask feature on the zoom window, i then was not able to get the zoom window back to the state where it was before setting up the mask (see picture).
Edit: Did you attach the wrong picture maybe?
These PSU can be used directly. But this is just 750W power consumption.
If you are always working on 4ch and 200 Mhz you need better scope than Rigol that undersamples.
If you do the equivalent of using a hammer to insert screws, is it surprising that the results are sub-optimal?
I don't see that as much of a problem in practice, especially if you're aware of it. Four simultaneous 200MHz signals aren't easy for hobbyists to find. It's really easy to drop down to two channels if you're in doubt. You'll probably see a difference on the Siglent, too, if it's anything more than a simple sine wave.
If you're always working at 200MHz on four channels then you need a better 'scope than either of these. Probably active probes, too (if you're using probes).
It's an LED downlight with a 1m power cord attached to it. So you install it into your ceiling and then... ahhh... WTF?