you may occasionally experience tombstoning on some parts that didn't happen during the first reflow cycle.
That's impossible unless there was soldering defect to begin with. It cannot simply detach from the solder, surface tension won't allow it.
I do not completely agree with this, and happen to have seen this in a past project. This was not a module but a board that had to go through 2 reflow passes due to the way it was designed (not getting into details but basically it had to be tested after the first pass with incomplete assembly for testability reasons and due to very expensive parts).
Surface tension won't allow "detaching", unless there is enough unbalance between the two sides.
Although tombstoning is much more likely to happen on the first reflow cycle, this is not impossible for that to happen during a second cycle. It's due to an unbalance between the two sides and that unbalance may come from two main sources: wettability issues and surface tension. Obviously the wettability will become a non-issue during a second cycle, but there may still be an unbalance in surface tension during reflow if both sides have significantly different thermal masses. For very small parts such as 0201 or even 0402, that can cause enough torque to rotate the component. And yes this is usually a mix of a design issue (too different thermal masses at the pads), unsufficient or uneven solder paste quantity, and the reflow thermal profile.
The fact this is a module here and that the reflow profile during the first cycle and the second may be different could also be a reason why this could happen during the second cycle only.
Admittedly this is a relatively rare event and is bound to happen only with pretty small/light components and design specifics. Just thought it would be interesting to point it out.