Author Topic: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter  (Read 4576 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheSteveTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3753
  • Country: ca
  • Living the Dream
GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« on: July 02, 2017, 05:06:00 am »
I recently picked up an Agilent 53230A frequency counter. I thought I would use my GPSDO as the reference in and compare it to my Rubidium standard.
This is a plot of 10000+ readings, 12 digits, 1 second gate time, the min/max are set by the first 500 readings.

I know HighVoltage has the same counter,a GPSDO and Rubidium standard, hopefully he can post a shot of his to see how it compares.

« Last Edit: July 02, 2017, 05:31:12 am by TheSteve »
VE7FM
 

Offline 0.01C

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 91
  • Country: hk
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2017, 01:42:44 pm »
I will try >:D

0.01℃
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2384
  • Country: de
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2017, 02:13:52 pm »
GPSDO have mediocre short - and mid-term Allan stability, compared to an Rb standard.
Better use the TimeLab package and the 53230A as a T.I. counter for the 1pps signals, to adjust the Rb standard to 1E-11 level, which will at least take several hours to mitigate even these mid-term variations of the GPSDO.

Frank
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5473
  • Country: de
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2017, 08:48:29 pm »
My old HP GPSDO seems to be very stable but I do not have a working Rubidium standard at the moment.
I will set up this test with my stable external OCXO, it will be a good basis for a future RB test.
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline TheSteveTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3753
  • Country: ca
  • Living the Dream
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2017, 10:26:12 pm »
My GPSDO is a Trimble 63090 which came from a WCDMA site in Japan. My Rubidium standard is a repaired LPFRS-01. So neither are anything super exciting. The GPSDO does have a 1 PPS output but the Rubidium is 10 MHz only. I thought it might be interesting to see how others compared.
I'll certainly have to fire up TimeLab with the 53230A

I left it running overnight, 59000 + samples with the GPSDO as external reference and the rubidium as the input.
Here are the results:



VE7FM
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5473
  • Country: de
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2017, 12:42:53 pm »
I am warming up my equipment.
Last time I used these three counters was many month ago.
Isn't it just amazing how close they are to each other, when measuring the HP GPSDO?

The HP Z3805A needs about 2 hours to be in GPS Lock mode.
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5473
  • Country: de
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2017, 02:51:27 pm »
TheSteve
How did you get such a nice histogram of your measurement.
This was just measured on one channel, right?

Here is my attempt to get a good relationship between my GPSDO and external Piezo 10 MHz OCXO
Plus, how did you get a screen dump on your 53230A, it seems my instrument does not want to do that.

So, here is a picture of the screen
After 3587 measurements, only 582 pHz Pk to Pk
I find this kind of remarkable, or I am wrong?

The 53230A runs on its own internal OCXO reference.
 
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline VK5RC

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2672
  • Country: au
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2017, 01:48:35 am »
When I get home I can set up a similar trial, 53230, z3805 (it stays on continuously) and a Efratom lpro Rubidium.
Aren't we really comparing the different disciplining protocols, both use a quartz crystal one disciplined by the Ru RF transition, the other indirectly Caesium?
Whoah! Watch where that landed we might need it later.
 

Offline TheSteveTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3753
  • Country: ca
  • Living the Dream
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2017, 03:21:07 am »
HighVoltage - Saving a screen shot is anything but intuitive with these things - The sequence is Utility, System Setup, Manage Files, then for the action select "capture" - you can pick internal or external memory such as a USB drive.

VK5RC - I am really just looking at how my GPSDO and Rubidium references differ. Obviously any error I see can be from either device as my GPSDO is external reference for the counter and I am logging the data from the Rubidium standard.

My first post is a Histogram with a readings set to 500, a 1 second gate time, 12 digits. My second is the same config but I have math enabled which can display Allan Deviation.
I just bought another GPSDO today (Symmetricom 58503B), so once it arrives and has warmed up for a few days I'll compare it to my Trimble to see how much they wander around.

VE7FM
 
The following users thanked this post: VK5RC

Offline VK5RC

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2672
  • Country: au
Re: GPSDO vs Rubidium with a 53230A counter
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2017, 10:11:23 am »
When I got home my wife had unplugged my z3805 to charge some garden tool battery.
Yesterday I was getting result of 1000uHz StanDev and AllanDev of 150uHz or so in the first few hours.
Quite a lot better tonight.
After 24hrs warm up , I get the results below over 20mins or so.
Edit; input is 50 ohms (or so) via a 3dB attenuator.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2017, 10:13:12 am by VK5RC »
Whoah! Watch where that landed we might need it later.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf