Author Topic: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard  (Read 6831 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #25 on: August 20, 2017, 08:11:26 pm »
Here's an edited version of that pdf, which just has the circuit analysis, schematic, and parts list (attached).

It looks like the main reference zener is a 1N825.

The heated reference "can" might make a great training playground for gaining experience with building and tuning an oven and current driver for the 2DW232 zeners.
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #26 on: August 20, 2017, 08:41:59 pm »
Oh wow, hparchive has a gorgeous copy of the 6101A manual (which has the same schematic as the 6116A), which appears to have been digitally reconstructed / recreated!  Perfectly legible!

http://www.hparchive.com/Manuals/HP-6101A-Manual.pdf

I've attached a similarly condensed / edited version.
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #27 on: August 21, 2017, 04:59:09 pm »
The HP 61xx supplies use a 3 stage differential amp in the oven part. The unit shown here is just a 2 stage differential amp in the oven. Also not very many transistors outside. So the circuit seems to be even simpler, but i could very well follow the general structure.

The temperature regulation looks like a simple proportional regulator. Not sure the oven part is that good to reuse it in a more modern application. The circuit is still from the pre OP era - such circuits today are usually OP based and thus look much different. Today a transistor couple is usually more expensive than a complete OP with in many respects better performance - so precision circuits today prefer OPs over the old style pairs.
 

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #28 on: August 24, 2017, 05:29:52 am »
The circuit is still from the pre OP era - such circuits today are usually OP based and thus look much different. Today a transistor couple is usually more expensive than a complete OP with in many respects better performance - so precision circuits today prefer OPs over the old style pairs.

Thanks for your insights here.  I've been wanting to develop a better understanding of how op-amps work, so this is a useful circuit to consider.  Another thread on this forum advised studying the GAP/R P65 circuit, which was a primitive op-amp which only used 6 transistors.
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 

Offline manganin

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Country: fi
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #29 on: August 24, 2017, 01:01:36 pm »
Another thread on this forum advised studying the GAP/R P65 circuit, which was a primitive op-amp which only used 6 transistors.

It doesn't need to be that complex. See the circuit attached: 3 transistors and 3 resistors (if you replace the current sources with resistors). Works fine in applications like audio if you remember the drive capability, gain and PSRR limitations in your circuit design.

 
The following users thanked this post: cellularmitosis

Offline Zucca

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4306
  • Country: it
  • EE meid in Itali
Re: HP ET 5188 (in-house) Voltage Standard
« Reply #30 on: August 24, 2017, 01:54:23 pm »
cool, can't wait to see how this ends... 
Can't know what you don't love. St. Augustine
Can't love what you don't know. Zucca
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf