Author Topic: Measurements on emf-error of switches  (Read 21294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Muxr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1369
  • Country: us
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #50 on: July 12, 2017, 05:32:41 am »
Really cool Andreas! I was looking at TI's MUX506 or MUX507 as well which can handle 36V, but they don't mention much about protection, they also advertise low leakage. I don't really need anything above 16V.
 

Offline Andreas

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Country: de
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #51 on: July 12, 2017, 09:34:42 pm »
What do you mean with protection?

Most of the muxes have no protection against input voltages above supply voltage.

I am now trying some FETs (BSS138) on my 2:1 dividers to protect the unbuffered LTZs if I have a flat battery/bad battery contact on my ADCs.

On my relay mux I have high ohmic output resistors which can be shorted if the output voltage is within 1 mV of the expected value.

With best regards

Andreas
 

Offline Muxr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1369
  • Country: us
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #52 on: July 12, 2017, 10:04:03 pm »
Indeed, I am finding that most analog muxes don't have protection. The MCP508 zhtoor suggested does however:



 

Offline Andreas

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Country: de
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #53 on: July 13, 2017, 05:05:46 am »
Hello,

for a unbuffered LTZ a 1K resistor is relative low (compared to the 7V/4mA zener current).
I want a cirquit that limits the current below 2mA.
On the other side: a 1 K series resistor (additionally to the switch of 300-500 Ohms) is relative high when regarding leakage currents of up to 10 nA.

with best regards

Andreas
 

Offline Muxr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1369
  • Country: us
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #54 on: July 13, 2017, 01:52:41 pm »
Ahh, I see. All the references I will be measuring are buffered. Just the hodge podge of all the references I own and perhaps some more I make in the future.
 

Offline doktor pyta

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 488
  • Country: pl
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #55 on: December 05, 2017, 12:08:59 am »
« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 12:38:47 pm by doktor pyta »
 
The following users thanked this post: Andreas, Muxr, zhtoor, beanflying

Offline janaf

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 339
  • Country: se
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #56 on: February 06, 2019, 01:34:48 pm »
How do you measure EMF of relays?

Just zero the voltmeter, short the inputs, and then connect a (closed) relay and take a reading? Or what?

I saw this method somewhere (picture): connect a relay/switch, open and close the relay, take readings, the difference would be due to switch EMF. What's do you think is a reasonable resistor value, low to keep noise down but high enough not to load down the EMF? 1K?

(Otherwise, I kind of like that Japanese paper; it seems they measured a number of relays, selected pairs, two per channel, that more or less cancel each others EMF).
« Last Edit: February 06, 2019, 02:47:32 pm by janaf »
my2C
Jan
 

Offline janaf

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 339
  • Country: se
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #57 on: February 06, 2019, 01:42:01 pm »
...and the picture.
my2C
Jan
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14192
  • Country: de
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #58 on: February 06, 2019, 05:22:35 pm »
1 K might be more on the high side - the switch resistance should be much lower than even 10 Ohms. I would not be worried so much about noise, more about bias current. 1 K and 100 pA would already be 100 nV.  I would be less worried about the loading effect that might change a few percent of the voltage at most.

The other point would be possible thermal EMF from the resistor, if not at a constant temperature.

I would consider testing a few contacts at a time, by switching between the contacts.

If temperature is really constant all over the voltage reading should be zero, even for poor contacts. So one would also get a kind of typical, not so good thermal condition. How this is defined is not clear to me. Anyway a few temperature readings would be needed. With a mono-stable relay the self heating of the could could be the relevant heat source - so maybe check with a voltage close to the upper limit to get more effect.
 

Offline janaf

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 339
  • Country: se
Re: Measurements on emf-error of switches
« Reply #59 on: February 06, 2019, 09:30:16 pm »
I'd use a 7.5 digit DMM, don't think there'd be anything like 100pA there but would have to check what it looks like...

Once I tested thermocouples and was surprised what load they could drive.

 
my2C
Jan
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf