Author Topic: PX Reference  (Read 29503 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #100 on: February 28, 2018, 07:23:35 am »
Let's see, the noisefloor comes out with this LT1763 board. I'm building a little PS with mains-filtering and 2x200mA Blocktrafo for two LT1763.
 

Offline eurofox

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
  • Country: be
    • Music
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #101 on: March 05, 2018, 01:25:43 pm »
I got my 1st one ready, output 7.0666V on my Brymen BM869S, I just sold my Agilent 34401A and wait for my Keithley 2001 for more accurate data.

Just surprised with low voltages, usually is in the area of 7.1V

Next one will be with resistors from Edwin Pettis.

eurofox
eurofox
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2382
  • Country: de
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #102 on: March 05, 2018, 02:05:44 pm »
I got my 1st one ready, output 7.0666V on my Brymen BM869S, I just sold my Agilent 34401A and wait for my Keithley 2001 for more accurate data.

Just surprised with low voltages, usually is in the area of 7.1V

Next one will be with resistors from Edwin Pettis.

eurofox

Beneath sample variation, that depends also on the oven temperature.
Maybe you have used 15k/1k?

Frank
 

Offline eurofox

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
  • Country: be
    • Music
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #103 on: March 05, 2018, 02:18:50 pm »
I got my 1st one ready, output 7.0666V on my Brymen BM869S, I just sold my Agilent 34401A and wait for my Keithley 2001 for more accurate data.

Just surprised with low voltages, usually is in the area of 7.1V

Next one will be with resistors from Edwin Pettis.

eurofox


Beneath sample variation, that depends also on the oven temperature.
Maybe you have used 15k/1k?

Frank

Hello Frank,

I got 12K2955/1K, it should be a little bit higher than with a 13K  :phew:

eurofox
eurofox
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #104 on: March 05, 2018, 10:40:36 pm »
Hello Dr. Frank,

for what is this temp-resistor between the two primary 110V windings in your block-transformer? Is it necessary to use one, and what type is it?

Thanks
 

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #105 on: March 05, 2018, 10:55:37 pm »

I got 12K2955/1K, it should be a little bit higher than with a 13K  :phew:

No worries, the two boards which I have assembled so far are both using 12k2 /  1k dividers from the ebay hifi seller.  They seem fine in a less-than-72F environment so far.
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2382
  • Country: de
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #106 on: March 06, 2018, 07:03:53 am »
Hello Dr. Frank,

for what is this temp-resistor between the two primary 110V windings in your block-transformer? Is it necessary to use one, and what type is it?

Thanks

You're  referring to my Precision Current Source article?
That's been in the EAGLE lib only, it's a principle circuit diagram.
These BLOCK transformers sometimes have a thermal safety fuse (resettable) inside, though.

Frank
« Last Edit: March 06, 2018, 07:09:03 am by Dr. Frank »
 
The following users thanked this post: hwj-d

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #107 on: March 06, 2018, 08:25:28 am »
Hello Dr. Frank,

for what is this temp-resistor between the two primary 110V windings in your block-transformer? Is it necessary to use one, and what type is it?

Thanks

You're  referring to my Precision Current Source article?

Yes. Forgot the thread in the moment.

Quote
That's been in the EAGLE lib only, it's a principle circuit diagram.
These BLOCK transformers sometimes have a thermal safety fuse (resettable) inside, though.

Frank

Many thanks. Then I don't need it explicitly.
 

Offline Andreas

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3243
  • Country: de
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #108 on: March 06, 2018, 08:44:23 am »
I got 12K2955/1K, it should be a little bit higher than with a 13K  :phew:

eurofox

Hello,
I think it is the other way round:
The raw TC of the zener is around 50 ppm/K.
with 12K3 against 13K you lower the setpoint by around 14 deg C giving -700 ppm or around -5mV against nominal.

with best regards

Andreas
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #109 on: March 08, 2018, 10:45:11 am »
New kids on the block ;D

Build two little gem's with PX V2.4 and TEKO 371 54 x 50 x 26 mm

The pictures says it all:





The resistors i've used:





Thanks to cellular  :-+
« Last Edit: March 08, 2018, 10:55:14 am by hwj-d »
 
The following users thanked this post: quarks, cellularmitosis, kj7e

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #110 on: March 08, 2018, 10:58:03 am »
Some more pictures:







Size comparison:



« Last Edit: March 08, 2018, 11:01:46 am by hwj-d »
 
The following users thanked this post: quarks, kj7e

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #111 on: March 08, 2018, 11:04:47 am »
Some measurements: these are also very stable.




 
The following users thanked this post: cellularmitosis, zhtoor

Offline Echo88

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: de
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #112 on: March 08, 2018, 11:46:07 am »
Nice! I particularly like the close thermal coupling of the divider-resistors.
 
The following users thanked this post: hwj-d

Offline TiN

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4543
  • Country: ua
    • xDevs.com
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #113 on: March 08, 2018, 11:48:20 am »
Cute. However hanging binding posts are asking for a trouble  :P.
Also to apply term "very stable" to LTZ ref, one need use better measurement gear and talk about this after at least few months of ageing  ;).
YouTube | Metrology IRC Chat room | Let's share T&M documentation? Upload! No upload limits for firmwares, photos, files.
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #114 on: March 08, 2018, 12:24:32 pm »
Hello TiN,

yes, that's right. i know it all.  ;)

Shurely, the cuties are not there to be used with binding posts in this way, but to be used in another housing because of additionally RF shielding. That's an experiment at all.

Also, term "very stable" should mean for this early measuring of course. Maybe I should have expressed myself more cautious, but in the meantime we all know what we have from these ltz's on one or the other kind of this pcb's and costs and effort of them.
 

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #115 on: March 08, 2018, 02:48:49 pm »
I love it!  Great job hwj-d.  I have some TEKO cases on their way :)

Have you toyed with the temperature compensation resistor yet (400k)?  I’m waiting on more thermal epoxy to arrive before I can take another shot at making a heated enclosure.

You might try measuring two LTZ’s back-to-back, which will give you more resolution.  Connect the positive output of two refs to the inputs of your meter, then bridge the two negative outputs together.

Edit: Andreas mentioned using isolated supplies for this measurement.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2018, 02:51:02 pm by cellularmitosis »
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 
The following users thanked this post: hwj-d

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #116 on: March 08, 2018, 08:08:11 pm »
Quote
I love it!  Great job hwj-d.  I have some TEKO cases on their way :)

 :-+

But one little caveat are there with my solder posts and TEKO 371. Because they are interference fittings, I can't get out the pcb without destroying two of them (maybe not, i've not tried it yet).

Quote
Have you toyed with the temperature compensation resistor yet (400k)?  I’m waiting on more thermal epoxy to arrive before I can take another shot at making a heated enclosure.

No, that's one urgent next point to learn for me. Next step is to build this 2*200mA psu as compact as possible. Then bring it together with temp compensation, output other voltages, maybe multiples, and so on.

What's about a kj7e's 10V buffer pcb from osh?  ;D
(€: no, first, need to play arround with own measuring values, LTC2057, and so on, with respect to kj7e's suggestions.  :) )

I think, TiN and others are right. The measuring possibilities reach their limit with lm399 based instruments. Now I need a K7510...  :o unattainable ...

Quote
You might try measuring two LTZ’s back-to-back, which will give you more resolution.  Connect the positive output of two refs to the inputs of your meter, then bridge the two negative outputs together.

Edit: Andreas mentioned using isolated supplies for this measurement.

Yes absolutely. A big playground opens up.  :clap:
« Last Edit: March 08, 2018, 08:42:07 pm by hwj-d »
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #117 on: March 08, 2018, 08:25:24 pm »
After burn in a couple of weeks, i need a calibration of one or some of them.
(as free as possible, except shipping costs of course.  ::) )
Who can I address then, medium term, if possible in Germany or EU?
I know, maybe a difficult question...

Thanks
 

Offline Echo88

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: de
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #118 on: March 08, 2018, 08:59:35 pm »
You can ship it to me: I have a 3458A, last calibrated about 9 Months ago. Other users in Germany with a 3458A are Dr. Frank, Andreas, e61_phil and High Voltage (if memory serves me right).
 
The following users thanked this post: hwj-d

Online splin

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 999
  • Country: gb
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #119 on: March 08, 2018, 09:10:13 pm »
Some measurements: these are also very stable.




Min:+ 7.124 16,  Max:+ 7.124 18, Span: 0.000 01?
 

Offline cellularmitosisTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Country: us
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #120 on: March 08, 2018, 09:17:55 pm »
Oh, I just noticed that 7.12417 is repeated twice on the vertical scale.  What is the vertical scale of that graph?
LTZs: KX FX MX CX PX Frank A9 QX
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #121 on: March 08, 2018, 09:23:44 pm »
You can ship it to me: I have a 3458A, last calibrated about 9 Months ago. Other users in Germany with a 3458A are Dr. Frank, Andreas, e61_phil and High Voltage (if memory serves me right).

That's very sweet of you! Thanks.  :-+

After a couple of weeks burn in, I would like to use that, after PM.

Big, big thanks again :) :)
 

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #122 on: March 08, 2018, 09:52:49 pm »
@splin,

there is a small peak, going to Max:+ 7.124 18, that's not going to span, luckily.

@cellular,

yes, that's often criticized indistinctness from many people to Keysight.

But look at the average, that's says 7.124 166 above the middle line, that is 7.124 165 (wrong) roundet to 7.124 17. The whole y-achsis is 10µV, so the lower is 7.124 16 the upper is real 7.124 17.  ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: cellularmitosis

Offline hwj-d

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 676
  • Country: de
  • save the children - chase the cabal
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #123 on: March 08, 2018, 10:24:39 pm »
The other measurement picture seems to be even more opaque.  :-/O

Average says 7.153 564V. The y-scale span is again 10µV.

Now the upper line is (wrong, at this point) roundet to 7.153 57 but real 7.153 565.
The middle line is real 7.153 560,
and the lower line is real 7.153 555, but again wrong roundet to 7.153 56

 :)
 

Online splin

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 999
  • Country: gb
Re: PX Reference
« Reply #124 on: March 08, 2018, 11:34:01 pm »
@splin,

there is a small peak, going to Max:+ 7.124 18, that's not going to span, luckily.


I assume this comes from rounding issues - using 7 1/2 digits internally, but only displaying 6 1/2. One of the reasons that some prefer to use the DMM for datalogging and using a spreadsheet for the statistics calculations so you know exactly what is going on. 
 
The following users thanked this post: hwj-d


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf