Author Topic: Atmel SAM D20  (Read 3125 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tszabooTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7369
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Atmel SAM D20
« on: September 17, 2014, 07:47:35 am »
Hello,
I'm planning to use one of the Atmel SAM D20/D21 MCU in an upcoming project. I dont have any experience with Atmel's ARM products, nor with the M0+. It is considered because the communication interfaces, there should be a lot of separate SPI, DMA between them, and this is the cheapest with lot of SPI.
Did anyone use them before? What is the experience with them? Am I missing something, or it doestn have a ROM bootloader so you need ISP to program them after manufacturing? Is the Atmel studio a good software environment? The last time I worked with Atmel, it was a 8 bit AVR six years ago... Thanks for taking your time to reply!
 

Offline Spikee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 568
  • Country: nl
Re: Atmel SAM D20
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2014, 04:15:28 pm »
The new unreleased Arduino Zero is using the Atmel SAM D21 zo it should be a pretty good chip.
I have used AVR studio quite a lot and I must say that it is a pretty good IDE for programming. No major issues with it tbh.
You can put a bootloader on the chip to program it via usb or whatever. But ISP also works.
Freelance electronics design service, Small batch assembly, Firmware / WEB / APP development. In Shenzhen China
 

Offline tszabooTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7369
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Atmel SAM D20
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2014, 04:59:24 pm »
I usually prefer ROM UART bootloaders, because that makes production programming much easier. With a "bed of nails tester" when you have to integrate a third party production programmer for the ISP, it becomes a mess.
 

Offline Spikee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 568
  • Country: nl
Re: Atmel SAM D20
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2014, 05:06:22 pm »
I usually prefer ROM UART bootloaders, because that makes production programming much easier. With a "bed of nails tester" when you have to integrate a third party production programmer for the ISP, it becomes a mess.
It should all be possible
Freelance electronics design service, Small batch assembly, Firmware / WEB / APP development. In Shenzhen China
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf