Author Topic: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs  (Read 35849 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« on: March 27, 2014, 07:08:54 pm »
What are the low-end MCUs that you look forward to playing with?

For me, it is STM32F030F, a 20pin CM0 chip. For its form factor, performance, versatility and low price.

It is my replacement for the equally low-end 16F684.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2014, 07:10:16 pm »
Not to mention it's isp-capable.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline Laurynas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 47
  • Country: lt
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2014, 09:13:14 pm »
http://www.cypress.com/?rid=92146

MCU is available for some time and i already used about a dozen of them, but this prototyping kit is great when i want something simple like arduino, but with "proper" IDE and chip :)
 

Offline HackedFridgeMagnet

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2028
  • Country: au
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2014, 09:30:49 pm »
Just designed a board using the STM32F030F, finished and ordered yesterday. But only RS components seem to have the chips in stock now. Hopefully they will make more soon.

By ISP you mean the SWD on the STM32s?
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2014, 10:14:04 pm »
Quote
MCU is available for some time

Wow! That's really interesting.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline miceuz

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 387
  • Country: lt
    • chirp - a soil moisture meter / plant watering alarm
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2014, 10:59:53 pm »

Offline nuhamind2

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • Country: id
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2014, 01:01:09 am »
By ISP you mean the SWD on the STM32s?
I think he means the uart bootloader
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9939
  • Country: nz
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2014, 01:30:12 am »
I have a STM32F030  discovery kit here somewhere but ive not played with it yet.

Definitely seems like a good replacement for the larger AVRs which can get up to $10 each
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2014, 01:43:11 am »
http://www.cypress.com/?rid=92146

Nice!! 24MHz or 48MHz with programmable logic blocks? decisions decisions decisions, might as well get both! or many of each, but more of the 4200s.

Nah I'll start with one of each for now, Thank you VERY much!

 

Offline andyturk

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 895
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2014, 01:54:18 am »
... i want something simple like arduino, but with "proper" IDE and chip
A "proper" IDE would actually let you write C++ code. :-(
 

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2014, 02:07:22 am »
... i want something simple like arduino, but with "proper" IDE and chip
A "proper" IDE would actually let you write C++ code. :-(

Not with 32kB of Flash RAM, 4kB of SRAM and 4kB of ROM
 

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2014, 02:24:23 am »
More pricey PSOC 4200 at $25 but with Arduino header and capacitance slider, leds etc
http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-53992

Edit:
Features
PSoC® 4200 SoC
- ARM Cortex™-M0
- 48MHz CPU
- Supports an extremely low-leakage hibernate mode consuming only 150nA, and also 20nA best-in-class stop mode
Arduino® Shields and Pmod™ Compatible interface
CapSense® Slider with SmartSense™ Auto Tuning
RGB LED
User button and more!
« Last Edit: March 28, 2014, 03:53:50 am by miguelvp »
 

Offline true

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 329
  • Country: us
  • INTERNET
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2014, 04:03:01 am »
Waiting for general availability and general pricing for STM32F042...

Also using STM32F030F4P6, nice little chip.
 

Offline Laurynas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 47
  • Country: lt
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2014, 08:14:31 am »
That pioneer board also has a PSoC5 along with PSoC4 (M3 core, much more regular stuff and programmable digital blocks).
I got a couple of those boards, but I'm more excited about small, cheap, basic dev boards :)
 

Offline Seg

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 71
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2014, 08:36:07 am »
... i want something simple like arduino, but with "proper" IDE and chip
A "proper" IDE would actually let you write C++ code. :-(

Not with 32kB of Flash RAM, 4kB of SRAM and 4kB of ROM

By "C++" do you mean "STL"? Because STL on a micro is insanity.
 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13745
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2014, 08:41:04 am »
Most interesting thing for me at the moment, more mid than low end,  is PIC32MZ - 512K RAM, hi-speed USB, QSPI and external memory interface, in packages down to a 64QFP.
 
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Online hans

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1638
  • Country: nl
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2014, 08:49:51 am »
I've been looking at a PIC16F1455, as a $1 chip capable of USB without a crystal, in a 14-pin package.

But seeing all those interesting STM32F0 chips makes me think whether it's not more productive to change to ARM all together ;) :-/O

The PIC32MZ is an interesting.. should be capable of running Linux.
Also, finally, they have got a chip with proper external memory integration. However, with 512kB integrated RAM I don't see when you will need that anytime soon :)
Not too impressed with PPS on PIC32 though. I tried to design in a PIC32MX470 on a project last month, but it felt more like a clutter than a feature. SPI SCK was not on PPS matrix, not every pin supports SPI SDO/SDI at the same time. Maybe I'm spoiled with the PIC24 PPS where it is like "oh I need timer/UART/SPI, I just throw it on any RPx pin and sort it out when I write firmware"
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2014, 10:54:24 am »
Quote
I've been looking at a PIC16F1455, as a $1 chip capable of USB without a crystal, in a 14-pin package.

Yeah. Both 1455 and 1454 are quite interesting and competitive, particularly vs. older / other PIC16F chips.

Quote
PIC24 PPS

That remappable pin assignment implementation is absolutely the best, in my view - actually the whole pic24 family is very well done. No one has come close to Microchip in terms of PPS.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2014, 11:01:00 am »
Quote
A "proper" IDE would actually let you write C++ code. :-(

A "proper" IDE would actually let you get your job done. Period.

In this particular case, it actually allows you to write whatever code you wish to write, as long as you are able to set up your tool chain.

So if you cannot write C++ code on it, you have to blame yourself for that.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline gmb42

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 294
  • Country: gb
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2014, 11:19:44 am »
http://www.cypress.com/?rid=92146

Does anyone know where I can get these in (or shipped at non-exorbitant cost to) the UK, Farnell don't have stock, Mouser have a 15 week lead time?  I can't see any shipping costs on the Cypress site.
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2014, 11:26:31 am »
You will, once you go through the checkout process.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline Laurynas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 47
  • Country: lt
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #21 on: March 28, 2014, 11:36:48 am »
cypress online shop is best for chips, as they ship them for free and they keep lower costs than most distributors (i ordered 20 of these 4200 chips for 1$ each a couple of days ago).
for these prototype kits they have 15$ shipping so it's quite high for one device but not that exorbital when you're getting 5+.
for all other kits(like pioneer) they charge 25$ so it's usually more economical to get them from farnell or other distributors.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2014, 01:06:08 pm by Laurynas »
 

Offline poorchava

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1672
  • Country: pl
  • Troll Cave Electronics!
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #22 on: March 28, 2014, 12:12:53 pm »
I like PIC10F200: best replacement for 555 timer on dense boards.
I love the smell of FR4 in the morning!
 

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #23 on: March 28, 2014, 12:42:36 pm »
For that, I use 12F675 - you gain two extra pins.
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: Highly anticipated low-end MCUs
« Reply #24 on: March 28, 2014, 05:53:04 pm »
cypress online shop is best for chips, as they ship them for free and they keep lower costs than most distributors (i ordered 20 of these 4200 chips for 1$ each a couple of days ago).
for these prototype kits they have 15$ shipping so it's quite high for one device but not that exorbital when you're getting 5+.
for all other kits(like pioneer) they charge 25$ so it's usually more economical to get them from farnell or other distributors.

I ordered one of each last night and shipping to Chicago was $7.50 not terrible at all. Only thing is that you have to register and provide a web page address.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf