Author Topic: Microchip vs. MicroCHIPS vs. microchips: it is all about names!  (Read 1682 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dannyfTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8221
  • Country: 00
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/279323.php

It would have been nicer if the microchips used by MicroCHIPS were made by Microchip.

:)
================================
https://dannyelectronics.wordpress.com/
 

Offline Jay_Diddy_B

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2733
  • Country: ca
Re: Microchip vs. MicroCHIPS vs. microchips: it is all about names!
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2014, 05:40:57 pm »
I see that MicroCHIPS has the backing of Bill Gates.
Look forward to the message:

'Birth Control is unavailable - Installing Updates...'

Regards,

Jay_Diddy_B

 

Offline Precipice

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 403
  • Country: gb
Re: Microchip vs. MicroCHIPS vs. microchips: it is all about names!
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2014, 09:12:42 am »
Weren't they originally Arizona Microchip?
If so, you can sort of see how it evolved...
 

Offline qno

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 422
  • Country: nl
Re: Microchip vs. MicroCHIPS vs. microchips: it is all about names!
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2014, 04:19:02 pm »
I think they better can make a Birth Chip.

The couples who can can not get a pregnancy is growing faster.
Why spend money I don't have on things I don't need to impress people I don't like?
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf