Author Topic: Metrawatt M248B Post Summary (finding a blown fuse detection circuit)  (Read 6775 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
My take so far: No bar-graph and just because it's from Nürnberg doesn't mean we should bow down, kiss the dirt and hand over our wallets (err sorry, maybe purses too..)
(if you're my age, you'll need to buy new eye-glasses too)
Priced for the ISS https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01283LU8M/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_5_w
« Last Edit: June 12, 2017, 10:42:26 am by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11630
  • Country: us
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM/Theremin (Round 1 fail on a puggly-meter)
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2017, 12:55:48 am »
 :-DD :-DD   Hold on there...  We are just getting started with this review.  There is plenty more to come!

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM/Theremin (Round 1 fail on a puggly-meter)
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2017, 08:14:29 pm »
And the beat goes on... Screwdrivers still waiting to see action. You must have a ton of patience for H.O. to even cough a little (für das Produkt). Funny to see those DMM's moving along without any sub-titles or voice-over, but in the end I figured out what I was watching. It was nice to see an RF chamber.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2017, 09:42:15 pm by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM/Theremin (Round 1 fail on a puggly-meter)
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2017, 03:46:15 pm »
Part 3 - We see it sucks more juice than a Cadillac (and it's comparatively priced).
« Last Edit: May 19, 2017, 03:47:48 pm by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM/Theremin (Round 4 fail on a puggly-meter)
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2017, 08:31:15 pm »
Gossen still not responding.. great service? It'd be better if they told him to hang-on while they talk to the dumb-cuff's in engineering.
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM/Theremin (Round 4 fail on a puggly-meter)
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2017, 06:34:40 pm »
Testing with arb-gen waveforms...
« Last Edit: May 24, 2017, 10:44:44 am by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Round 5 on the killer Metrahit. Now latching relays can trip into states where high AC voltages measure as safe, giving operator a false reading of safety. Admittedly, a tape eraser emits a very strong field, but one wonders if this could be a killer meter after a side impact with enough G's to trip it the same way?

Edit: Those mixed-up terminals remind me of older idiot-style Volkswagen side mirror controls... while industry had accepted a joystick-style standard since the 70's, these guys used a dumb slide/rotary switch perpendicular mounted on the door (if you've used one, you'd remember it).

Another posted with a simple magnet..


An even smaller magnet (with proximity shown) what a piece of junk!
« Last Edit: May 24, 2017, 05:52:32 pm by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Take it apart!! :-+ 1st part of what many have waited for. The big transients are still to come..
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Gossen's Metra finally takes some hits.
Something in that HIT name, with all those MOV's and GDT's, it better not have failed!


I love this guys channel. I'm not sure who has more fun, him or us? Here, Fungus want's to throw it. OK..
 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM -Part 7 (finally throwing it some HV tests)
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2017, 12:54:13 am »
Joe, as I understand after hitting 100 users, you can update your channel with a custom URL.

If it's Ok with Dave, I'd like to suggest the channel photo: The old transient gen along-side the EEVblog DMM
« Last Edit: June 07, 2017, 01:10:30 am by Cliff Matthews »
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11630
  • Country: us
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM -Part 7 (finally throwing it some HV tests)
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2017, 03:59:16 am »
If you actually watched part 7, I ran that EEVBLOG meter again on the transient generator.   

I could pull a real URL and point to the YT channel or run one of the free domain servers but consider that the vast majority of the traffic comes from search engines.  YT is by far the largest.  EEVBLOG, even though this is pretty much the only place I post about the testing accounts for maybe 7% of the traffic.    Once the 121GW is released we will have a look at it.  My guess is that meter has a larger fan base than any meter I have looked at and you can't even buy it!       

Growing the channel it is not something I have been concerned with.       

Many very generous people have asked about donating but really I don't see that happening any time soon.  I hate to say how much time I have wasted on this GMC meter.  Three different distributors have asked about supplying me with products which I find very strange.  I can only assume they don't actually watch the videos or they would know better.    If a company sent me a meter to review, they would have to be VERY confident  in their product.  You saw how bad it went for that GMC meter.

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM -Part 7 (finally throwing it some HV tests)
« Reply #11 on: June 07, 2017, 11:51:43 am »
Yes, I watched part 7, but since someone else seemed intent on getting a good look at that cute decal..
Just thought a still shot of the two (like bad meets good) would frame-up the channel nicely.

Those distributors could be willing to gamble on getting good results, so they can link to the test and clear out overhead on dead stock (like the Garage Mechanic's Companion you bought). Reminds me of 35-years ago I was a manager at Radio Shack, and they gave sales guys an incentive called SPIFF's to clear out lazy-dog inventory.


 

Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
Re: Metrawatt M248B DMM -Part 7 (finally throwing it some HV tests)
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2017, 11:00:56 am »
So this is (I take it), the last focus on the Metrahit 248b for a while. Will you run tests with the new shield?

That's good news on the 121GW!! I've had my wallet itching me on that one for a while.
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11630
  • Country: us
Another follower asked about running the tests with the shield as well.  I did try the BT interface and that seems to work just fine from an easy 20' away but I am guessing you are concerned with the HV.  Keep in mind that the shield is downstream from the primary clamp.    What I will do is repeat the last test I ran and maybe use the ESD gun.  No need to ramp things up. 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11630
  • Country: us
Covers a few other questions people had about the meter, including if the meter will still survive the transient tests.


Offline Cliff MatthewsTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
  • Country: ca
    • General Repair and Support
And another "final reassembly" to clean up contacts etc. (some ohms readings were a bit low).
I thought poor contacts typically equal higher resistance..
 

Offline The Soulman

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 949
  • Country: nl
  • The sky is the limit!
And another "final reassembly" to clean up contacts etc. (some ohms readings were a bit low).
I thought poor contacts typically equal higher resistance..

Its not contact resistance that was the issue here, but a parallel resistance due to contamination on the pcb (fingerprints, spit, etc.).
A parallel resistance of 3,7941 G Ohm would have caused the difference between reading 9,9761 and 10,0024 M Ohm


BTW. the "official" thread is here: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/hear-kitty-kitty-kitty-nope-not-that-kind-of-cat/1305/
 
The following users thanked this post: Cliff Matthews

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11630
  • Country: us
And another "final reassembly" to clean up contacts etc. (some ohms readings were a bit low).
I thought poor contacts typically equal higher resistance..

Its not contact resistance that was the issue here, but a parallel resistance due to contamination on the pcb (fingerprints, spit, etc.).
A parallel resistance of 3,7941 G Ohm would have caused the difference between reading 9,9761 and 10,0024 M Ohm


BTW. the "official" thread is here: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/hear-kitty-kitty-kitty-nope-not-that-kind-of-cat/1305/

Soulman is correct.  It does not take much to screw things up.   


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf