I mentioned this in my other thread about choosing high-frequency DC blocking caps, but I thought I would spin it off into a separate thread.
I was inspired a little bit by Greg Charvat's MIT course stuff, but I wanted to go with something a little more ambitious than just screwing SMA connectors onto connectorised off-the-shelf building blocks. And to try teaching myself high-frequency layout.
Also, I wanted to keep the cost down as much as possible, and use components that were easy for me to source - and also create design materials that were suitable for hobbyists or students to re-use around the world at relatively low cost, using components that were accessible in small volumes. In my experience, here in Australia, it is difficult to access most components from Mini-Circuits for example, in small volumes compatible with low-budget hobbyist experiments. A nice goal, for example, would be to entirely have a BOM that can be sourced from the big distributors like Digi-Key so it's all easily accessible.
So, here are some photos of the early work I have come up with so far. It's a work in progress.
A center frequency of about 5.9 GHz was chosen, because the Hittite HMC431 and the HMC717 are the first LNA and VCO pair I could find to match the same frequency range I could find that were both stocked at Digi-Key. This also keeps the antenna size down a bit, and also matches Tony KC6QHP's "Radarduino" project.
I think the power level should stay within the LIPD class. Will check before firing it up I'm going to be using FR-4, sacrificing a little bit of RF loss at microwave frequencies to gain a substantial advantage in the price and availability of PCB manufacturing capacity, compared to the alternative of using something specialized like PTFE or Rogers fancy dielectrics. How much dielectric loss will there be in the FR4 at 5.8-6 GHz? But obviously FR-4 is very cheap and every cheap PCB fab in the world stocks the stuff, so there is an obvious advantage there over the more exotic RF substrates if you can accept a bit of loss.
Is it cheaper to use FR-4 and deal with the loss, or to fab the board out of unobtainium?
High-ish frequency 0603 chip inductors (3.3nH, Kemet L0603C3N3SRMST) were used in the DC bias path to the gain blocks, along with an appropriate resistor and some caps. Are those inductors suitable at this frequency? In one of the next prototype board revisions, pictured, I replaced the choke in the DC path with a thin meandered l/4 line in place of the 0603 chip inductor. This is really just an experiment so I can see how it behaves, see if it works.
On this board, all the solder mask is deliberately left off along the RF signal path between the VCO, gain blocks, transmit and receive antennas, and mixer. This makes it easier to show the signal path and explain how a radar works to an audience. It also probably makes the microstrip calculation model slightly more accurate because the thin layer of solder mask probably introduces a tiny error in that.
The original layout uses a Mini-Circuits MCA1-85 mixer, and a GP2X+ splitter (not yet placed on the board). However, it is difficult for me to get any stock of the GP2X here, so I have tried replacing it with a Wilkinson divider. 100 ohm resistors are much easier and cheaper to source! Not sure if it will work, but it's a learning exercise, an experiment in black magic.
In the next revision the mixer will be replaced with a Hittite HMC219, completely eliminating all the Mini-Circuits components and moving entirely to Hittite parts in the RF chain.
This board basically only consists of the RF stage - the filtering and processing of the IF output from the mixer, as well as the generation of the modulation voltage input to the VCO, is done on another external board which isn't finished yet.
Anyway, that's where things are at so far. I haven't quite gotten around to testing anything in a complete state, and it probably won't work on the first board. Or the first few boards. But it's an interesting educational project.
I don't have any access to a VNA, spectrum analyser for these frequencies or any instrumentation beyond my 100 MHz scope, so in terms of testing things it might just be a matter of pointing it at a
neighbour's 5.8 GHz WiFi AP retroreflector target at a certain range, with the VCO sweeping, and see what sort of IF signal comes back and see what happens.