Author Topic: A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator  (Read 1129 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline VanitarNordicTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 277
  • Country: 00
A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator
« on: October 21, 2018, 11:04:15 pm »
I am looking for a substitute of the general purpose 7812 which should introduce lower dropout and more stability, load regulations and so on ...  :popcorn:

No switching, only linear and easy to find
 

Offline oPossum

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1415
  • Country: us
  • Very dangerous - may attack at any time
Re: A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2018, 11:10:19 pm »
LM1117-ADJ

Proper capacitors must be used for stability.

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm1117.pdf

Also made by many other manufacturers.
 
The following users thanked this post: VanitarNordic

Offline VanitarNordicTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 277
  • Country: 00
Re: A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2018, 11:29:45 pm »
LM1117-ADJ

Proper capacitors must be used for stability.

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm1117.pdf

Also made by many other manufacturers.

Thanks, but I'm looking for a fixed output voltage, it is preferable. Besides, for SMD ones, the heatsink is a challenge. The current draw could reach 500mA.
 

Online DaJMasta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2297
  • Country: us
    • medpants.com
Re: A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2018, 12:00:44 am »
I mean, a variable regulator is a fixed regulator with external feedback resistors, but also the 1117 comes in flavors with integrated feedback resistors to have only the fixed output voltage.  Typically denoted as 1117-12 or 1117-3.3 or somesuch.  SMD packages also offer heatsinking through their tab through the board, and with lesser thermal transfer you can still stick a heatsink on the package itself.  There are options if you are not constrained to a TO-220 footprint.

Otherwise, there are both some other variants that could be good choices, and there are many circuit variations of the classic 7812 that give you more CMRR, lower drop out voltage, or are binned for tighter regulation.  There was a time when they were somewhat similar, but I think you'll find that a survey of several 7812 marked modern parts will turn up quite a number of differing implementations with different characteristics.
 
The following users thanked this post: VanitarNordic

Online SiliconWizard

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14463
  • Country: fr
Re: A susbstitute for the 7812 Regulator
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2018, 12:07:22 am »
 
The following users thanked this post: oPossum, VanitarNordic


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf