EEVblog Electronics Community Forum

Electronics => Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff => Topic started by: ocset on April 23, 2018, 07:42:35 pm

Title: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: ocset on April 23, 2018, 07:42:35 pm
¬¬Hello,

In the attached 6W Buckboost LED driver schematic, the high-side current sense is referred down to ground via the common base connected PNP  (FMMT560Q).

We are worried about   situations in which the collector and emitter currents of the PNP would start to differ  significantly. (eg, at  low [eg sub 1mA]   collector currents, or at high temperature, where  emitter-base leakage current may make collector and emitter currents differ.)

Can you confirm, in this schematic,  that  collector and emitter currents are always likely to  remain close in magnitude?


FMMT560Q datasheet
https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/FMMT560Q.pdf (https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/FMMT560Q.pdf)

LTspice simulation also attached.
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: T3sl4co1l on April 23, 2018, 07:50:02 pm
More or less by definition, the ratio (alpha) gets bad around saturation.

Tim
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: jmelson on April 23, 2018, 09:19:31 pm
Somebody has been smoking too much <something>.  That circuit is INSANE!  two op-amps, a switching power supply controller, several assorted transistors, 4 voltage sources, and on and on, for 6 W?

There are single chips that will do this very nicely, possibly with an additional resistor or two to set the parameters.

Jon
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: T3sl4co1l on April 24, 2018, 04:19:27 am
Somebody has been smoking too much <something>.  That circuit is INSANE!  two op-amps, a switching power supply controller, several assorted transistors, 4 voltage sources, and on and on, for 6 W?

There are single chips that will do this very nicely, possibly with an additional resistor or two to set the parameters.

Jon

You must be new here, look at his other posts too :P

Tim
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: ocset on April 24, 2018, 04:53:30 am
Quote
Somebody has been smoking too much <something>.  That circuit is INSANE!  two op-amps, a switching power supply controller, several assorted transistors, 4 voltage sources, and on and on, for 6 W?
There are single chips that will do this very nicely, possibly with an additional resistor or two to set the parameters.
Thanks, i should have said, Vin is from 18v to 137vdc....where it must work at 6w
But it must also work at 1.2w when vin = 8-14vdc.
And must work at 3.6w when vin = 14-18vdc.


Quote
More or less by definition, the ratio (alpha) gets bad around saturation.
Thanks, yes , i can see i have forgotten to add a base resistor, as in page 12, figure 3 of the following datasheet....

http://www.analog.com/en/products/power-management/led-driver-ic/buck-boost-led-drivers/lt3756.html (http://www.analog.com/en/products/power-management/led-driver-ic/buck-boost-led-drivers/lt3756.html)
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: BrianHG on April 24, 2018, 07:15:28 am
Try just using a lower voltage LED string, IE leds with some in parallel instead of just all serial, with either 1 buck converter (lower efficiency at high voltages) or 2 buck converters, with the higher one switching straight on when the voltage gets too low,  better efficiency at high voltage.
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: Zero999 on April 24, 2018, 08:04:01 am
Quote
Somebody has been smoking too much <something>.  That circuit is INSANE!  two op-amps, a switching power supply controller, several assorted transistors, 4 voltage sources, and on and on, for 6 W?
There are single chips that will do this very nicely, possibly with an additional resistor or two to set the parameters.
Thanks, i should have said, Vin is from 18v to 137vdc....where it must work at 6w
But it must also work at 1.2w when vin = 8-14vdc.
And must work at 3.6w when vin = 14-18vdc.


Quote
More or less by definition, the ratio (alpha) gets bad around saturation.
Thanks, yes , i can see i have forgotten to add a base resistor, as in page 12, figure 3 of the following datasheet....

http://www.analog.com/en/products/power-management/led-driver-ic/buck-boost-led-drivers/lt3756.html (http://www.analog.com/en/products/power-management/led-driver-ic/buck-boost-led-drivers/lt3756.html)
You should have stated the input voltage range in the first post.

I've noticed, you've posted quite a few questions relating to an 18V to 137V LED driver. It's certainly possible. I've seen commercial switched mode power supplies which can work off this kind of voltage range.  For example, the Rigol DS1054 oscilloscope, works from 36VDC to 400VDC, range of 1:111/9 even though it's only designed for 100VAC to 250VAC. Perhaps you can get the schematic for the PSU in the  Rigol DS1054 and work from that?
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: ocset on April 24, 2018, 11:22:29 am
I mean, the PNP in the schematic of the top post  cannot saturate because its Base-Collector junction cannot get forward biased in that schematic and setup.

It seems weird though that such a simple  method of referring a sense signal down from the high side is not more widely used? I mean, its just basically a cheap PNP transistor as shown in the top post. It makes you search for some hidden gremlin in  this PNP method.
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: Zero999 on April 24, 2018, 01:36:12 pm
I mean, the PNP in the schematic of the top post  cannot saturate because its Base-Collector junction cannot get forward biased in that schematic and setup.

It seems weird though that such a simple  method of referring a sense signal down from the high side is not more widely used? I mean, its just basically a cheap PNP transistor as shown in the top post. It makes you search for some hidden gremlin in  this PNP method.
Yes, the transistor can't saturate.

This seems odd: I'd expect the beta to be higher at higher temperatures and lower currents, down to a point of course.

Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: ocset on April 24, 2018, 07:24:46 pm
Thanks yes, i wonder how low the collector current has to go before the Hfe starts  getting really low?
Title: Re: Common base PNP where collector and emitter currents differ significantly?
Post by: jbb on April 25, 2018, 01:21:06 am
Oh treez, you don't disappoint  :D.

At risk of threadjacking, how about using a flyback converter to drive the LEDs? It'll probably be a little less efficient, but you get some advantages:

Alternatively, there are some options for pampas in the sensing system: