You post a question that suggests you haven't a clue about the physics involved.
A agree,I understand that from perspective of other person my question creates expectation that I "haven't a clue".The thing is,skill level in given field of knowledge isnt black and white,its alot more complex than that.For example,a teacher might know much more than student,but there might be one thing that student knows that the teacher doesnt know.
I take the time to offer an answer that'll put you on the right path and between first post and then you've learned enough physics to tell me I'm wrong.
I highly appreciate that you sacrificed your time to help,that is why I clicked SAY THANKS to give you thumb up for your effort.You claim I dismissed your post as "wrong",that is not completly true,I merely disagreed with one specific part.I agree with vast majority of your post.
Furthermore,I in detail wrote why I disagree,your reply was emotional outburst devoided of any counter argumenting logic.If it is wrong,write how and why,if you present evidence to your argument,I will happily agree.I have no motive to be hard headed and stubbornly hold my position as unshakable truth.If I am proven to be wrong I will not feel defeated,I will feel enlightened and delighted that I got rid off wrong understanding that holded in the past,all I wish for is to learn the truth.
If you know enough to know that I'm wrong you know enough to not need to ask the question in the first place.
That is not true,my question was rather complex one,it requires multiple "pieces" of knowledge.The part I disagreed is about difference between force and pressure.Just becose I know what is difference between force and pressure does not mean I must know about anything else except definition of force and pressure.
Just becose I disagreed on the force/pressure part does not mean I am master of electrostatic physics who is wasting time of people on internet by asking question which I already know.
Then you add insult to injury by changing the rules and throwing away all of the rules of physics that affect a practical, accurate answer - no dielectric breakdown, no fringe effects, no higher order effects
I appologize that I didnt clarified the dielectric constant and request to ignore electrical breakdown from the start.I forgot about it,as soon as I read your post I edited my original post and added this crucial information.That being said,I fail to see why this is such bad thing as you make it out to be.
In my first reply to you I wrote "I know about the air break down,still i appreciate that you warned me about it." Ok,I forgot to clarify these things outright,then you tried to teach me thing I already knew,I wrote that I already know it,and... whats the issue there? You seem to have anger problems,very short temper.I am surprised you make big deal out of such little unimportant things,I would never expect anybody to get angry becose of this.