It is looking more and more like a Arduino Uno.
So, why not make the layout compatible with the Uno, so shields will fit?
At first glance, the resistor with the crystal is not needed.
But the question remains: why do I want this board, and not a Uno/Uno Clone?
As Dave says: every board needs a "killer feature". What is the killer feature of this board?
About this part, I prefer having a lot of ground points, also the digital pins are now in a 14-pin header, instead of two messy seporate headers.
And what does the AREF have to do with digital pins? Blegh, that should be with a misc header or with the analog pins.
This is the basic set-up, eventually I will think about inserting more features, like a on-board Ethernet connection for either serial communication or real Ethernet connections.
I made the design different on purpose, this because I never intended on making it Arduino shield compatible.
My intention is to create a different board for people who enjoy fiddling with jumper wires(Hence the 6-pin ground header) to create prototypes, or learn to create electronic circuits to use with micro controllers, that is my goal.
And while I am at it, just keep it open source(Git page will be made in the near future).
The important thing is to have a solid basic, in my opinion.
Plus, I am just a hobbyist, All studies about electronics I did was 2 years of installation technology (Smart relays, PLC and wire pulling trough PVC tubes) [Een VMBO instal-techniek opleiding]
I see this as a good healthy challenge for myself, and I like to have feedback on my work.
The resistor on the crystal is there for a reason, you can find it back in the past comments.
Also, what's R2 for? Have never see that done before.
Answering my own question
https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=resistor+across+crystal&oq=resistor+across+cr&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0.8591j0j4&client=ubuntu-browser&sourceid=chrome&espv=2&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8
Seems more common with Microchip stuff.
@westfw:
Thanks, I will look into this, and perhaps swap some tiny parts for 0805 packages.
And indeed, I did mix some 0805 and 0603, I tried to keep them a bit compact where possible.
I put the auto-reset in due to it being rather default in circuits, yet I am aware of it's issues and it can be excluded if the community wishes for it.
Or I could do more research on how to stabilize it to where it functions properly.
After uploading the images I did a small circuit check in eagle and there were some errors, like:
* The trace running to pin 17 on the ATMEGA is shorting pin 18 &19.
* Some traces had a too tight or inappropriate bend.
* The IC4 pin4 copper slab created a collision issue(My bad, used a square instead of a polygon, fixed now and it has more copper to touch now.)
Personally I had a bit of a struggle with TO220's, not sure why.
Also, there seems to be an issue, I can't find an image in your reply.
With the sharp angles you mean where I join the wires in an angle, like a "Y"-split or angled trace-to-straight trace?
And I wonder, what other chip is there that's similar to the FT232RL but more up-to-date?
I chose this one for it's simple layout and ease of use, plus I never liked having to have a ICSP for the USB-to-serial chip itself, pure personal.
Though, how are the thoughts on the 2x3 + 2x5 pin connectors for ICSP? Good idea or more something to leave one of the two out?
Personally it's a feature I enjoy, having a choice whether to use a flat-cable to breakout or a 6 pin header.
And I am always open for examples and ideas, I really am, I just prefer positive-building-critic over the bashing critics, that's why I can take a tone in my writing at times, my apologies about that, it's nothing personal, just my mind making it a mess.
I really appreciate the hints and help, without it I can't learn to become better in my designs, thank you guys.
And about the Dave-quote, I know this, and it's true, hence this project won't stop with this main layout, it will grow bigger and better over time, maybe I will swap the 328-PU for a more heavy-duty one in the future, we will see.