Author Topic: New uRuler  (Read 48418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #100 on: September 25, 2015, 05:10:04 pm »
How about making the gerbers available like you did for the last version.

They are available as far as I know, you look for them.

hint: not in the forum but on the actual blog paged as I recall.
 

Offline timofonic

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 904
  • Country: es
  • Eternal Wannabe Geek
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #101 on: September 25, 2015, 06:13:56 pm »
Are there the original Altium files?

I would like to modify them with KiCad, try to add some stuff (logic probe? Not symbols? The symbols to draw? Suggestions welcome) and submit it here.

I may have issues, but I need to learn KiCad ASAP because I use Linux. I'm not going to use Windows or pirated OrCAD.
 

Offline pcbguy1927

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #102 on: September 29, 2015, 04:37:53 pm »
I only see gerbers for the old one.
 

Offline miguelvp

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5550
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #103 on: September 29, 2015, 04:44:42 pm »
my bad, saw two revisions and thought it was the newer one, I guess the original one had two revisions.
 

Offline DutchGert

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 257
  • Country: nl
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #104 on: October 01, 2015, 06:54:15 pm »
A little bit offtopic but does anyone know a (cheap) fab where I can order some selfmade rulers? A lot of cheap fab houses don't offer very good silk screen resolution and since that is key here i'd like to know what fab houses do offer high quality silk screen for a compedative price.
 

Offline DutchGert

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 257
  • Country: nl
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #105 on: October 11, 2015, 07:46:57 am »
A little bit offtopic but does anyone know a (cheap) fab where I can order some selfmade rulers? A lot of cheap fab houses don't offer very good silk screen resolution and since that is key here i'd like to know what fab houses do offer high quality silk screen for a compedative price.

Anyone?
 

Offline timofonic

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 904
  • Country: es
  • Eternal Wannabe Geek
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #106 on: October 11, 2015, 11:26:33 am »
A little bit offtopic but does anyone know a (cheap) fab where I can order some selfmade rulers? A lot of cheap fab houses don't offer very good silk screen resolution and since that is key here i'd like to know what fab houses do offer high quality silk screen for a compedative price.

Anyone?


I would like to know it too!
 

Offline nanofrog

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5446
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #107 on: October 12, 2015, 03:39:09 am »
+1  :-+
 

Offline thx130

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: gb
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #108 on: October 12, 2015, 02:20:31 pm »
A little bit offtopic but does anyone know a (cheap) fab where I can order some selfmade rulers? A lot of cheap fab houses don't offer very good silk screen resolution and since that is key here i'd like to know what fab houses do offer high quality silk screen for a compedative price.

Ask for Photoimagable Ident, it is more expensive but much sharper than the inkjet or silkscreened ident used as standard.

Source: work for a ciruit house
 

Offline MattHollands

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 313
  • Country: gb
    • Matt's Projects
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #109 on: October 13, 2015, 09:59:42 pm »
I'm in!!!!!!  :-+
Read about my stuff at: projects.matthollands.com
 

Offline timofonic

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 904
  • Country: es
  • Eternal Wannabe Geek
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #110 on: November 09, 2015, 01:08:09 am »
A little bit offtopic but does anyone know a (cheap) fab where I can order some selfmade rulers? A lot of cheap fab houses don't offer very good silk screen resolution and since that is key here i'd like to know what fab houses do offer high quality silk screen for a compedative price.

Ask for Photoimagable Ident, it is more expensive but much sharper than the inkjet or silkscreened ident used as standard.

Source: work for a ciruit house

That's interesting.

What about making symbols be able to be used to draw them? I posted some images about it, I think.

Maybe the manufacturer could get crazy about so many drilling?
 

Offline johnh

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 213
  • Country: au
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #111 on: November 09, 2015, 01:17:13 am »
i will take another set of 5
 

Offline tomy983

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: it
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #112 on: November 22, 2015, 09:48:54 pm »
Would love one!
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #113 on: October 19, 2016, 11:41:02 pm »
Wow, I can't believe it's been 2 years since I did this v3 µRuler  :o
Guess I should get off my arse and do some more.
I'm just looking at it again and thoughts on the back side imperial scale. Do I need all those different scales? (might be confusing?), or will just two different ones be enough? If so, which ones?, I'm not a Yank so I don't really know what are the most used imperial scales
Other stuff to add/remove?

« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 11:43:19 pm by EEVblog »
 

Online CatalinaWOW

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5226
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #114 on: October 20, 2016, 12:42:58 am »
I am sure there are many opinions on this, but the only imperial scales I use with any frequency are tenths, eighths, quarters.  Sixteenths occasionally.  Thirty seconds and sixty fourths never.  Same for twentieths and fiftieths and hundredths.  When needing more accuracy a ruler isn't the tool and decimal fractions are the answer, even in Imperial units.  I have never seen a micrometer calibrated in 512ths or whatever, and most of the calipers which have fractional scales also have sensible decimal scales.

I would consider extending the temperature conversion table to cover temperatures found worldwide.  -40C to 60C would cover ski areas and northern Europe, while getting most of the automobile in the sun temps.  The five deg C resolution is appropriate.  If you need tighter you go to your calculator or a bigger table.
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #115 on: October 20, 2016, 12:48:09 am »
I would consider extending the temperature conversion table to cover temperatures found worldwide.  -40C to 60C would cover ski areas and northern Europe, while getting most of the automobile in the sun temps.  The five deg C resolution is appropriate.  If you need tighter you go to your calculator or a bigger table.

Yep I was looking at that and thinking maybe it's a bit inadequate.
Many have said the Tantalum table is useless, and probably so, although I always forget the A/B/C/D package to metric conversions.
 

Offline chriswebb

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 143
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #116 on: October 20, 2016, 12:51:57 am »
« Last Edit: October 20, 2016, 12:54:34 am by chriswebb »
Always learning. The greatest part of life is that there will always be more to learn.
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #117 on: October 20, 2016, 12:55:34 am »
I am sure there are many opinions on this, but the only imperial scales I use with any frequency are tenths, eighths, quarters.  Sixteenths occasionally.  Thirty seconds and sixty fourths never.  Same for twentieths and fiftieths and hundredths. 

Yep, I was thinking of dropping the 64th and 50th as they are too small and maybe the the 0.5mm as well, as they are all a bit fine.
The 16th scale obviosuly handled the 1/4 and 1/8 as well.
 

Offline mpicker21

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: us
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #118 on: October 20, 2016, 03:19:42 am »
I'm a yank and although we were introduced to metric pretty well in school I still struggle sometimes with conversions between nano, micro, pico, etc. I know, I'm a noob. I feel ashamed that I have to leave a browser tab open with cap values.
 

Offline boffin

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1027
  • Country: ca
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #119 on: October 20, 2016, 03:29:35 am »
0.3" lead forming would be nice (small diodes, 1/8W res)
 
The following users thanked this post: vinicius.jlantunes

Offline rs20

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2318
  • Country: au
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #120 on: October 20, 2016, 03:41:53 am »
As a mostly metric animal, I think 20ths of an inch are occasionally useful, I think you may as well keep them there (at the very least, as the little minor ticks). I must point out that there are two separate sections of the ruler there marked "1/10" and "1/20", but they look identical. It's obvious that tenths are the big ticks and 1/20 are the small ticks, but it still irks me that they're labelled as if to imply that the two sections are different in some way.

I'd be very keen to keep the 32nds. So I guess I'm suggesting, drop the 1/50, and drop the 1/64. At least that's symmetrical, one off each side.

I really like the design in the 1/32 section, with the ticks of 3 different lengths -- there is some argument perhaps for just extending this along the entire ruler?
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #121 on: October 20, 2016, 03:45:31 am »
I really like the design in the 1/32 section, with the ticks of 3 different lengths -- there is some argument perhaps for just extending this along the entire ruler?

Yep, only argument against is clutter I guess.
 

Offline JS

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 947
  • Country: ar
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #122 on: October 20, 2016, 05:04:58 am »
  Finer than finer isn't needed, in analog meters was quite acceptable to use up to 1/10th of a division, and good luck to fine a pencil of 1/10th of a mm to write with.

  Resistance of a square could be useful along the copper thickness.

JS
If I don't know how it works, I prefer not to turn it on.
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37730
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #123 on: October 20, 2016, 05:37:32 am »
  Resistance of a square could be useful along the copper thickness.

I've got miliohms/in vs trace sizes
 
The following users thanked this post: JS

Offline alexanderbrevig

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 700
  • Country: no
  • Musician, developer and EE hobbyist
    • alexanderbrevig.com
Re: New uRuler
« Reply #124 on: October 20, 2016, 05:45:07 am »
Maybe use your proposed OSH cog wheel?  :)
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf