Thanks for the responses, that gives me something to chew on...
To clarify, the converter rates I'm considering here are in the 100+ MHz range, at 16 bit resolution (~12.5 ENOB). I would like to eventually move to the GSPS range (and do RF sampling), but the ENOB drops dramatically. I was wondering if it would be possible to get back a sufficient SNR by combining multiple channels. Since this is for a relatively narrow-band application, I do consider the effects of time-averaging (one gets log4(N) bits improvement in ENOB by time-averaging N samples).
One of my existing designs uses a downconverter feeding an ADS5485 running at 200 MHz, with an FPGA digital downconverter running between 1-5 MSPS (depending on the mode). The datasheet lists the SNR at -75 dBFS (=12.5 ENOB) for a ~70 MHz input. With the highest downconversion rate available, I can expect to get 3.8 bits by time averaging (which is what the downconverter's filters do) for a total of 16.3 bits. I can verify this on my setup. I was considering, for example, the ADC12DJ2700 that can operate at 5.4 GSPS, but only gives me -48 dBFS (=8 ENOB) SNR at 6 GHz input frequency. Assuming the same 1 MSPS output rate, I would expect an improvement of 6.2 bits, for a total of 14.2 ENOB at the output, considerably worse than the original design. Since this would be a beam-formed multichannel receiver, I was wondering if I could exploit that fact to improve the SNR some.
Rhb, you may be on to something regarding use of broadband noise as the input during a bench test. All of the sources at my disposal are low ENR (HP 346B) and won't put out enough to measure directly with the ADCs, but I could try amplifying them. Thanks for the reference, I'll look it up. Bendat and Piersol also have an "engineering applications" book that I have on hold at my library.
The article [1] by Reeder et al seems to indicate that averaging multiple converters does result in an SNR improvement, and ADI apparently even sold a standard product to do this. The details are a bit hazy (the assumption is that all sources of noise are uncorrelated), but they do show measurements from time-averaging four converters. If indeed the quantization noise is correlated, I would expect that once one gets below 14 ENOB (for the AD6645 used by Reeder et al), you'd no longer see any improvement in SNR, right?
[1]
Pushing the State of the Art with Multichannel A/D Converters