Author Topic: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!  (Read 4279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 74HC04Topic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 49
  • Country: gb
  • Lifetime Electronics Nerd and full-time EE.
My shiny new copy of TAoE 3rd edition arrived today. However it is *full* of proofreading symbols in many of the chapters (e.g. ¶ and §). Does anyone else have a copy like this?
 

Offline dom0

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1483
  • Country: 00
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2015, 01:18:49 pm »
Like in the review part of all chapters? Maybe it's meant as a somewhat ... odd enumeration symbol?
,
 

Offline 74HC04Topic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 49
  • Country: gb
  • Lifetime Electronics Nerd and full-time EE.
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2015, 01:25:59 pm »
D'oh! Thanks, I think you might be onto something there dom0  :-[.

Example 1 - page  24  "use a hefty solid-state relay (SSR, §12.7)"... I have read that § means 'section' so perhaps that was intentional?
Example 2 - page 126 (Chapter review) "¶A. Pin-Labeling Conventions."

Is yours the same?




 

Offline Stupid Beard

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 221
  • Country: gb
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2015, 01:32:55 pm »
D'oh! Thanks, I think you might be onto something there dom0  :-[.

Example 1 - page  24  "use a hefty solid-state relay (SSR, §12.7)"... I have read that § means 'section' so perhaps that was intentional?
Example 2 - page 126 (Chapter review) "¶A. Pin-Labeling Conventions."

Is yours the same?

§ = section, ¶ = paragraph. They are using them to refer you to specific parts of the text. Nothing weird going on here.
 

Offline 74HC04Topic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 49
  • Country: gb
  • Lifetime Electronics Nerd and full-time EE.
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2015, 01:39:41 pm »
D'oh! Thanks, I think you might be onto something there dom0  :-[.

Example 1 - page  24  "use a hefty solid-state relay (SSR, §12.7)"... I have read that § means 'section' so perhaps that was intentional?
Example 2 - page 126 (Chapter review) "¶A. Pin-Labeling Conventions."

Is yours the same?

§ = section, ¶ = paragraph. They are using them to refer you to specific parts of the text. Nothing weird going on here.

Thanks for that. Methinks my initial flick through the book was a bit too brief! This must be the most embarrassing forum thread I have ever authored. :palm: To add to my embarrassment, I was once a trained typist!

FWIW, these managed to confuse the heck of my colleagues too! 
 

Offline Stupid Beard

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 221
  • Country: gb
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2015, 01:47:57 pm »
D'oh! Thanks, I think you might be onto something there dom0  :-[.

Example 1 - page  24  "use a hefty solid-state relay (SSR, §12.7)"... I have read that § means 'section' so perhaps that was intentional?
Example 2 - page 126 (Chapter review) "¶A. Pin-Labeling Conventions."

Is yours the same?

§ = section, ¶ = paragraph. They are using them to refer you to specific parts of the text. Nothing weird going on here.

Thanks for that. Methinks my initial flick through the book was a bit too brief! This must be the most embarrassing forum thread I have ever authored. :palm: To add to my embarrassment, I was once a trained typist!

FWIW, these managed to confuse the heck of my colleagues too!

In fairness, this falls under the category of stuff that's easily forgotten through disuse.

Still a bit funny though :-DD

 

Online tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 19503
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2015, 02:04:49 pm »
Thanks for that. Methinks my initial flick through the book was a bit too brief! This must be the most embarrassing forum thread I have ever authored. :palm: To add to my embarrassment, I was once a trained typist!

I've never embarassed myself like that. Oh no. perish the thought. Never never never ever.

(But the trick is to simply admit it and move on. Obviously you realise that, but not everybody does!)
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline German_EE

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2399
  • Country: de
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2015, 08:51:17 pm »
Nothing to worry about, I've just learned what § and ¶ mean from this thread and I've been seeing them for decades.
Should you find yourself in a chronically leaking boat, energy devoted to changing vessels is likely to be more productive than energy devoted to patching leaks.

Warren Buffett
 

Offline radioFlash

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 163
  • Country: us
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2015, 02:03:56 am »
The paragraph symbol is called a pilcrow. Now you can read all about it on Wikipedia!
 

Offline Fred27

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 726
  • Country: gb
    • Fred's blog
Re: The Art of Electronics 3rd Ed. Full of proofreading symbols?!
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2015, 07:54:33 am »
@radioFlash Thanks. That's exactly what I've just done, with some more sidetracking into other unusual typography and punctuation.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf