Author Topic: The uBeam FAQ  (Read 277064 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #900 on: July 28, 2017, 03:26:19 pm »
And as many people predicted how this would end, out comes to the misogyny card  ::)
She probably whispered in his ear about all the misogyny and hate she's hate to go through because she's female, and that's the reason why she is struggling and will be the ultimate reason why she won't succeed.
Had nothing to do with her idea being stupidly impractical from the get-go, and her trash talking TED talk and other self-grandiosing interviews ::)
 

Offline PaulReynolds

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Country: us
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #901 on: July 28, 2017, 03:37:06 pm »
Quite a heated discussion on Twitter the other day between the uBeam CEO and a VC.

https://twitter.com/meredithperry/status/889504937163476992

 :-DD

She knows everyone has jumped ship and the product isn't even close to working how she imagined. She knows the game is over and it's just shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic at this point.

Since it's been deleted by all parties, here's today's public service announcement reminding us all that the internet is forever.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170728003852/https://twitter.com/meredithperry/status/889504937163476992

 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #902 on: July 28, 2017, 04:33:10 pm »
Seems like Matt Ocko deleted all his tweets.
Maybe he was scared he might have upset the VC club?
 

Offline djos

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Country: au
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #903 on: July 28, 2017, 04:37:03 pm »
Seems like Matt Ocko deleted all his tweets.
Maybe he was scared he might have upset the VC club?

Seems plausible, extremely funny tho.
The impossible often has a kind of integrity which the merely improbable lacks.
 

Offline brainwash

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 438
  • Country: de
    • Hack Correlation
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #904 on: July 28, 2017, 05:57:13 pm »
It does sound like there is some personal stuff involved there and/or some missed business opportunity. However, it's just a reminder that anything you post on the Internet will follow you forever.
2/ Why do these people have to underline their PC in their profile? I thought their business was to make money, does PC somehow give a business advantage? Or does it draw in more investors? Or is it just a friendly warning?
3. Fighting in PUBLIC internet is worse than even doing it over the company email. Are followers impressed somehow by displays of bravado? Why not launch into a private email discussion or (gasp) a face-to-face one?

That was just my small rant on how I don't understand this newfangled stuff.
 

Online daqq

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1315
  • Country: sk
    • My site
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #905 on: July 28, 2017, 06:34:33 pm »
Quote
And as many people predicted how this would end, out comes to the misogyny card  ::)
Next up: How racist is math? Is gravity discriminating fat people?
Believe it or not, pointy haired people do exist!
+++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8171
  • Country: 00
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #906 on: July 28, 2017, 06:46:58 pm »
So, Matt Ocko wants me to take down my tweet of the screen shot of his tweet above:

What a wuss.

PS: Is Meredith on Twitter all day, leaping in whenever anybody says anything bad about her?

 

Online mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11146
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #907 on: July 28, 2017, 06:50:29 pm »
Quote
And as many people predicted how this would end, out comes to the misogyny card  ::)
Next up: How racist is math? Is gravity discriminating fat people?
Apparently, carbon fibre is sexist :
https://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/crazy-academic-feminist-thinks-carbon-fibers-are-misogynistic
Original paper : http://research.gold.ac.uk/11135/
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #908 on: July 28, 2017, 07:31:40 pm »
2/ Why do these people have to underline their PC in their profile? I thought their business was to make money, does PC somehow give a business advantage? Or does it draw in more investors? Or is it just a friendly warning?

It's important to remember that VC's spend other people's money.
Their entire business is built around networking and not pissing people off or rocking the boat, otherwise the money might dry up.
Seems like in this case he spoke the truth and what he really thought (that uBeam numbers didn't add up, and Perry was too snarky), and then realised that could potentially hurt his business (no doubt people he knows invested in uBeam). Hence his request for me to delete my tweet so it doesn't show up in his timeline.

Quote
3. Fighting in PUBLIC internet is worse than even doing it over the company email. Are followers impressed somehow by displays of bravado? Why not launch into a private email discussion or (gasp) a face-to-face one?

He asked me to take the discussion to private PM (I didn't), and a few hours his tweets were all gone.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2017, 07:36:49 pm by EEVblog »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #909 on: July 28, 2017, 07:33:17 pm »
What a wuss.
PS: Is Meredith on Twitter all day, leaping in whenever anybody says anything bad about her?

Don't know, she blocked me way back  ;D
I need to Shift-Ctrl-N to watch the show.
 

Online daqq

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1315
  • Country: sk
    • My site
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #910 on: July 28, 2017, 07:55:54 pm »
Quote
And as many people predicted how this would end, out comes to the misogyny card  ::)
Next up: How racist is math? Is gravity discriminating fat people?
Apparently, carbon fibre is sexist :
https://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/crazy-academic-feminist-thinks-carbon-fibers-are-misogynistic
Original paper : http://research.gold.ac.uk/11135/
...wow... just wow...I mean, wow?
Believe it or not, pointy haired people do exist!
+++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
 

Offline brainwash

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 438
  • Country: de
    • Hack Correlation
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #911 on: July 28, 2017, 08:39:10 pm »
Quote
3. Fighting in PUBLIC internet is worse than even doing it over the company email. Are followers impressed somehow by displays of bravado? Why not launch into a private email discussion or (gasp) a face-to-face one?

He asked me to take the discussion to private PM (I didn't), and a few hours his tweets were all gone.

Well, I don't mean your discussion, I think that was pretty civil on both sides.

Quote
And as many people predicted how this would end, out comes to the misogyny card  ::)
Next up: How racist is math? Is gravity discriminating fat people?
Apparently, carbon fibre is sexist :
https://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/crazy-academic-feminist-thinks-carbon-fibers-are-misogynistic
Original paper : http://research.gold.ac.uk/11135/

Ok, I was initially ready to dismiss this, as "avoiceformen" sounds pretty biased. But the article seems written by a woman. Then I started reading the abstract and article paper and it made references to masculinity, which doesn't sound too bad/biased, it's just a quality, like 'sensual'. I thought it would be one of those wank studies on literature that we had to do in highschool and read into stuff that wasn't there. But then the article paper shows a standard picture of a cyclist crossing the finish line and adds this:

Quote
"For example, the advertising image selling bicycle helmets (Fig. 1) literally positions the bicycle as the penis/phallus, the man triumphantly holding his hands in the air, framing the object between his legs as the centre of his own and others’ attention. The man pictured is producing himself around the object in between his legs. the semiotics of the image suggests that the bike (like the man’s penis?) is to be celebrated for helping him dominate other men. This is a clear example of power being produced by matter (the light, fast nature of the carbon fibre) and by bodies (the winning man) and through competitive intimacy between men."

Wow.
So my executive summary: the man looks like a dick, points to his dick, rides the bicycle between his legs because he wants to hump other men.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2017, 08:46:31 pm by brainwash »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #912 on: July 28, 2017, 11:13:12 pm »
More from Matt Ocko
Again he wants me to delete information from one part of the Internet (Twitter), but not another (this forum).

 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #913 on: July 28, 2017, 11:25:42 pm »
More on why he wants me to delete the tweet, and Paul's forum post:



 

Offline Rbastler

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 281
  • Country: it
  • Wörk Wörk
    • Rbastlers Blog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #914 on: July 28, 2017, 11:32:40 pm »
More from Matt Ocko
Again he wants me to delete information from one part of the Internet (Twitter), but not another (this forum).
Woudn't count this forum as a third party ?

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

http://rbastlerblog.jimdo.com/
Gamma spectrometer works. Now some yellow crystals need regenerating and testing.
 

Online StillTrying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1330
  • Country: gb
  • 100% Brand New and High Quality, in theory.
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #915 on: July 28, 2017, 11:56:23 pm »
"the founder has the right for her work to be vetted by customers at this point,"

I can see a slight problem there.

After 6 years and $30m have uBeen sold even $0.01 yet. (selling old furniture doesn't count!)
« Last Edit: July 29, 2017, 09:18:54 am by StillTrying »
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8171
  • Country: 00
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #916 on: July 29, 2017, 12:04:51 am »
Oh, dear, he's making it much worse!   :popcorn:

At this rate it'll be on every major news site within 24 hours.
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8171
  • Country: 00
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #917 on: July 29, 2017, 12:23:50 am »
More from Matt Ocko
Again he wants me to delete information from one part of the Internet (Twitter), but not another (this forum).

How will he delete it from the internet archive?
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #918 on: July 29, 2017, 12:53:04 am »
"the founder has the right for her work to be vetted by customers at this point,"
I can see a slight problem there.
After 6 years and $30m have uBeen sold even $0.01 yet. (old furniture doesn't count!)

Nope, and they aren't even close to a pre-production prototype.
Also, they refuse to publish any information on efficiency or any real performance data, nor have they ever addressed any technical criticism.

Matt's problem is that he has broken the golden rule of VC club, you don't diss another VC's investments. Because the entire VC process is predicated on the need to sell to the next (non VC) sucker up the money pyramid. So you don't ruin another VC's chances at doing that, that's bad form.
uBeam are still looking for the next bigger round of funding (probably desperately so at this point), so it wouldn't surprise me if someone has tapped him on the shoulder and reminded him of that.
 

Online helius

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2372
  • Country: us
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #919 on: July 29, 2017, 01:34:55 am »
VCs depend entirely on "deal flow": a constant stream of entrepreneurs coming to them to pitch business plans. If for whatever reason a VC annoys a founder, they risk getting a bad reputation and founders deciding to pitch somewhere else.
This is also the reason it's so hard to get an honest "no" from a VC. They prefer to string you along with vague encouragement, never telling you they have already invested in a rival company to yours. The more they can enforce a one-way flow of real, actionable information, the better their position is. Telling you what they really think is out of character.
 

Offline Howardlong

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4311
  • Country: gb
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #920 on: July 29, 2017, 01:41:04 am »
Something I was wondering whether to draw attention to or not is the positive discrimination Perry has used to her advantage, but now she's pulled the sexism/misogyny card, it seems a reasonable time to do so.

At least one of her VC investors, and uBeam board member, Mark Suster, appears to regard her blondeness as a key reason to invest, meanwhile taking the opportunity to throw in a string of pejorative stereotypes in the process. Had the Jimmy Choo been on the other foot, you can be sure there'd have been an outrage. Irrespective I find the following statement to be rather cringeworthy to say the least,and ironically, rather awkward:

Quote
Were she a shy, pimply, awkward male engineer with a pocket protector she would fit an archetype that would make sense to observers. But she’s not. She’s confident, communicative, outspoken, young and blonde.

(From Suster's blog https://bothsidesofthetable.com/what-is-it-like-to-wake-up-and-have-the-press-ready-to-torpedo-your-business-351f27ca6d67)

If I were a betting person, I'd also suggest that Marissa Mayer, among others, wouldn't have invested either, had the self-described "inventor" not been female.

While I have been wary to bring this up, I strongly suspect she'd never have received funding had she been a bloke.

 
The following users thanked this post: Fungus

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8171
  • Country: 00
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #921 on: July 29, 2017, 06:57:08 am »
VCs depend entirely on "deal flow": a constant stream of entrepreneurs coming to them to pitch business plans. If for whatever reason a VC annoys a founder, they risk getting a bad reputation and founders deciding to pitch somewhere else.

From the exchange with Meredith it looks like she'd already rejected him, so...  :-//

While I have been wary to bring this up, I strongly suspect she'd never have received funding had she been a bloke.

It's certainly a weird game of cat and mouse they play. One side trying to pull a scam (Meredith), the other trying to build a reputation as a "winner" by choosing the right sort of scammers.

The quality of the product doesn't seem to enter into it. It's all about appearances.

I assume all the worthwhile ideas go right past the VC system, they don't really need it.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2017, 07:00:56 am by Fungus »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #922 on: July 29, 2017, 08:13:53 am »
Something I was wondering whether to draw attention to or not is the positive discrimination Perry has used to her advantage, but now she's pulled the sexism/misogyny card, it seems a reasonable time to do so.

At least one of her VC investors, and uBeam board member, Mark Suster, appears to regard her blondeness as a key reason to invest, meanwhile taking the opportunity to throw in a string of pejorative stereotypes in the process. Had the Jimmy Choo been on the other foot, you can be sure there'd have been an outrage. Irrespective I find the following statement to be rather cringeworthy to say the least,and ironically, rather awkward:

Quote
Were she a shy, pimply, awkward male engineer with a pocket protector she would fit an archetype that would make sense to observers. But she’s not. She’s confident, communicative, outspoken, young and blonde.

(From Suster's blog https://bothsidesofthetable.com/what-is-it-like-to-wake-up-and-have-the-press-ready-to-torpedo-your-business-351f27ca6d67)

If I were a betting person, I'd also suggest that Marissa Mayer, among others, wouldn't have invested either, had the self-described "inventor" not been female.

While I have been wary to bring this up, I strongly suspect she'd never have received funding had she been a bloke.

Careful now, Matt Ocko has already basically implied that all her critics like me, Paul, the tech media, and everyone here are misogynist  ::)
Everyone's so misogynistic that she got $28M :palm:
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26337
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #923 on: July 29, 2017, 08:25:48 am »
If I were a betting person, I'd also suggest that Marissa Mayer, among others, wouldn't have invested either, had the self-described "inventor" not been female.

A huge part of the VC game is publicity, and you get publicity by being different and being able to make a juicy tech headline. Not fitting existing sterotypes plays a big part in that. They know this, she had a good back story the media would lap up - no engineering background, just "stumbled" upon the idea, struggled against the expert naysayers, won a contest, and yep, you guessed it, being female and attractive in media photos.
People want to believe that someone who doesn't fit the sterotype can be a success.
Not misogyny, it can in fact be a huge advantage to female in the business, it's the realistic world of how the media works. And it happens to those technically worthy and based on merit, and also those not.
It could happen in other appearance ways too, like having orange hair and face tattoos or something, the media want a photo and a story headline people will click on.
Of course that's not to say her tenacity, gift of the gab, and belief in the idea didn't pay a big part. She wasn't handed $28M on a silver platter just for being female.
Had she been an ultrasonics researcher at MIT with no backstory struggle it's unlikely she would have gotten the money either. Her entire TED talk is a textbook narcissistic rant about that.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2017, 08:38:33 am by EEVblog »
 

Offline brainwash

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 438
  • Country: de
    • Hack Correlation
Re: The uBeam FAQ
« Reply #924 on: July 29, 2017, 09:31:43 am »
Quote
Were she a shy, pimply, awkward male engineer with a pocket protector she would fit an archetype that would make sense to observers. But she’s not. She’s confident, communicative, outspoken, young and blonde.

(From Suster's blog https://bothsidesofthetable.com/what-is-it-like-to-wake-up-and-have-the-press-ready-to-torpedo-your-business-351f27ca6d67)

...
While I have been wary to bring this up, I strongly suspect she'd never have received funding had she been a bloke.


I hate to say it but it's taken a bit out of context. He says that she is a geek on the inside but looks nothing like one. That's all I could read.
However, that's just his description, a true geek would use the facts and science, which doesn't seem the case here. I feel the geek word is being thrown around too lightly these days, without being earned. Just like 'rockstar'.
I also agree with Dave, looks make a sale a lot of the time, it's just how stuff has worked since forever. Any attractive person will get a lot more attention and have a definite advantage. Or is that also discrimination? I should file a complaint or write a paper, feeling left outside as a pimply nerd...
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf