Copper is a heavy (toxic) metal which should not end up in the surface water because no matter how much you dillute it, it will be accumulated somewhere in nature (and end up in your food).
Sure, in huge amounts, copper is problematic in nature, food and body.
On the other hand, copper is necessary for life. The vitamin supplement I'm taking right now while writing this gives me 0.5 mg, which is 50% of the daily intake value (EU). Why is this added in this multivitamin product? Because some research has probably shown that many food products don't have enough.
We literally eat copper, and we would literally die without it. You probably urinate copper down the drain during a few years more than what the OP is going to dispose of, so stop urinating first before blaming others.
Copper's everywhere in the nature, and life would end without it. It's not comparable to elements usually called "toxic heavy metals", which are not only unnecessary but very toxic (many orders of magnitude more than copper): lead, mercury, cadmium...
But yes, copper is kind like sodium (table salt) in your system, and in ecosystem, too; it has to be in balance. That's why wasting is controlled, and large companies producing a lot of copper waste must be very careful with it. A PCB hobbyist getting rid of an etchant? Not a problem. This is similar to a traditional photography hobbyist getting rid of used fixer solution, releasing a bit of silver. At a commercial level, at times when all photography was film-based, that would have been a problem if it was unregulated.
There are elements that are really toxic in nature, even in small amounts, so that no wasting can be allowed, even on hobbyist level. Copper is not one of them.
Any questions?