This is a set of...
of...
...nonlinear resistors!
Yeahhhhh!
Now take this big huge set of nonlinear resistors, and put it near the set of linear resistors (they also have their own symbol).
What have you got now? What is the set formed by the set of linear and nonlinear resistors?
It's a set of...
...
Resistors!
Yeahhhh!
I hoped (it was somewhat intentional on my part), that my recent post(s) in this thread, would elisit, more information from you (the OP), as to what you thought was going on, and it seems to have worked, as you seemed to have done that.
In summary and as a sort of analogy, this is how I seem to understand, the point(s)/concept(s) you seem to be trying to portray.
(Hypothetically speaking, i.e. I have NOT just done this).
I create an interesting and long new thread on here, describing my new $50,000 electric car, which happens to have (very approximately), a 100 volt battery set up, along with a 100kW motor (engine if you like). I have then described the technical details, of all its (interesting to some) systems and functionalities.
You have now jumped into my (hypothetical) thread, and said ...
"no no NO NOOOOOOO!!!!, what nonsense MK14 is talking ......"
This is all really a 1 milliohm resistor (non-linear resistor), with a supplied link to a set theory YouTube video, for very young people.
So, although there is a little bit of technical merit (correctness), and the $50,000 new car, is a bit like (sort of, at a stretch of the imagination), a 1 milliohm resistor (non-linear).
The vast bulk of the time, and to almost everyone, it is NOT a useful, interesting or good way of expressing, what it is.
E.g. Which thread title would people be more likely to click on?
"I just bought my great new, $50,000 super fast electric car, technical details of all its electronic systems included, with advanced AI self-driving to level 3"
Or
"Today I bought a 1 milliohm, (non-linear) resistor"?
The start of the thread then says...
100V 100kW (max)
I hope my analogy is accurate?