Recent Posts

Pages: Prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
31
General Technical Chat / Re: new propellantless drive company
« Last post by woofy on Today at 08:36:00 pm »
Professor Eric Laithwaite came up with similar nonsense, suggesting that the behaviour of gyroscopes violated the law of conservation of energy. He said there was a device which could displace itself outside of its own center of mass. It ultimately destroyed his reputation and career.
32
Beginners / Re: buying a oscilloscoop
« Last post by tggzzz on Today at 08:35:43 pm »
OP: please note that pcprogrammer's and baldurn's last posts contain a lot of wisdom :) It is worth understanding why they make those points.

Be cautious of those claiming newer==better. Frequently older is sufficient :)

Be very aware that the type of tests you do for repair are very different to those when developing something.
33
Microcontrollers / Re: RIP Z80
« Last post by PCB.Wiz on Today at 08:34:13 pm »
The Zilog one might be stopping, but the Toshiba and Sharp units are likely to stay in production for a good number of years still, as they also have all the peripherals of the Z80 family inside the package, and thus you can make a complete SOC with them, as they all now have 32k of RAM and 32k of flash built in, though there are still a fair number made with older OTP Eprom memory, which is in a lot of industrial equipment, copiers and such, along with lots of other applications where they have a very long code base life, and are familiar with the design.

Yup, the process FAB that makes Zilog's CMOS version of the NMOS Z80, is being terminated. The NMOS Z80 is long gone.

Zilog still have other CMOS process Z80 variants, as do other companies.

Just like intel no longer publicly sells stand alone 8051, there are many companies making new-process 80C51 variants.
The original 8051 has 8 bit opcode fetch, and 12 clocks per opcode.

The newest 80C51's can fetch 24 bits of opcode in a single clock cycle, and run at 45Mhz +
The 80C51 is the most widely sourced 8 bit MCU on the planet.
 
34
PCB/EDA/CAD / Re: JLCPCB alters soldermask without any notice
« Last post by wraper on Today at 08:34:09 pm »
This time they changed it without any engineering query. Instead of one large polygon, they made the sodlermask opening as 4 small slits for each row of ICs and a fifth hole for the ground pad.       
I've experienced Chinese fabs messing up with stencils in a similar way by reducing aperture in different ways, even when explicitly requested not to. Probably because many hobbyists just leave 100% aperture everywhere.  Why in hell you'd mess with solder mask though. Picture would certainly help to see the issue as it's hard to understand what it was and what they did. Row of ICs or did you mean row of pads?  :-//
36
Repair / Re: Sony J30 PSU repair
« Last post by Harry_22 on Today at 08:30:27 pm »
Next connect DC power supply +12,5V to central pin of FCH30A04 (red circle on PCB). And check the rest voltages (in circles).
37
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SDS3000X HD and upgraded SDS1000X HD
« Last post by Martin72 on Today at 08:30:08 pm »
At the time, my SDS2104X HD came with probes (5050A) that did not appear to be of such high quality:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sds2000x-hd-12bit-(published-for-chinese-domestic-market-only)/msg4236166/#msg4236166

39
Test Equipment / Re: EIP 545B Frenquency counter
« Last post by rplabs on Today at 08:26:15 pm »
Hello,

Sorry to post in this old thread but I think it is better to have all info in one thread.

I have an EIP 578B later version it seems. Date code on the ICs are from 1994.
I has the options 05 and 06. I wanted to add option 02 and I followed the info here but is not working as it should. I added the AD7524 and the CR3 diode and removed R39 and R40 but I still had Error 13. So I started to investigate the CAL EEPROM X2816CP.

Offset 0x0 had 0x55 so I modified it to 0x00. Now option 02 is active and it doesn't give the Error 13 but is showing meaningless digits.
For example at 0.0dBm from my generator I see 096 at -30dBm I see 362 at +13dBm I see 268.

It never shows the dot or the minus sign. I guess I need some calibration values in the EEPROM but I cannot find any CAL EEPROM from a 578B.

I also dumped my firmware from the other EEPROM 27C512 and it is dated 1994.

I attached both files here in case someone needs them

Thanks!
40
PCB/EDA/CAD / Re: JLCPCB alters soldermask without any notice
« Last post by thm_w on Today at 08:20:38 pm »
Photo would help.

I'm surprised they bother to look at any gerbers that don't obviously violate the rules. It seems like a waste of time to me.
Just have the disclaimer "we make your design if your design is bad no refunds."
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next