Author Topic: Automotive Control Unit Teardown  (Read 6703 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline luky315Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 226
  • Country: at
Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« on: July 31, 2015, 05:31:15 pm »
I had the opportunity to have a quick look at the control unit for a 20.000€ aftermarket four-wheel drive conversion for a van.
And I must say that I'm not impressed...
 

Offline bitseeker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9057
  • Country: us
  • Lots of engineer-tweakable parts inside!
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2015, 06:35:26 pm »
Was looking at the top side and thinking, "hmm, OK". Then, I looked at the back. :o
« Last Edit: July 31, 2015, 06:39:29 pm by bitseeker »
TEA is the way. | TEA Time channel
 

Online HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5473
  • Country: de
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2015, 07:33:56 pm »
What brand and model is that?
Link to a website?
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline luky315Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 226
  • Country: at
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2015, 08:49:29 pm »
It's from a VW Crafter 4x4 by Oberaigner http://www.oberaigner.com/produkte/volkswagen/crafter-4x4/
 

Offline rvalente

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 726
  • Country: br
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2015, 12:29:28 am »
Have no checked all components but they do not seem  to be AEC-Q100 certified and as far as I understand, they are not required to be, since it is an aftermarket module, its self regulated...
 

Offline marshallh

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
  • Country: us
    • retroactive
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2015, 03:26:11 am »
It's either Protel/dxp or Eagle with ELECTRA autorouter. Eww
Verilog tips
BGA soldering intro

11:37 <@ktemkin> c4757p: marshall has transcended communications media
11:37 <@ktemkin> He speaks protocols directly.
 

Offline max_torque

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1282
  • Country: gb
    • bitdynamics
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2015, 12:25:21 pm »
Not a lot of heat sinking on those power switches (BTS/IPS)!   Have to hope they have seriously overated them for the load they are driving.......
 

Online tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7377
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2015, 03:08:51 pm »
DAT USB routing  :o
I guess it is short and kinda works. They should have gone for 4 layers if they cannot be bothered with this boring so called hand routing everyone else does.
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2384
  • Country: de
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2015, 05:24:37 pm »
A horrible electronic - absolutely non-automotive concerning components, layout and soldering.

All solder joints look bad, no pronounced, shiny solder meniscus visible. => reliability problem , will fail temperature shock test (1000..2000 cycles)
It's also eye-catching, that the chicken food (R + C) all sit askew on their pads.. too small capillarity.. obviously the reflow soldering profile / peak temperature was too low, or the solder depot was too less.
Or has this PCB been soldered manually??
Look at these gruesome bodgers of the H-bridge drivers!

The pad geometry of several components are really bad, especially many power components have too small pads, or not sufficient cooling area.

On top side, the big 22 Ohm resistor has no copper cooling area at all. (The heat normally  is dissipated to 90 % over the solder junctions into the cooling area.)
The solder junctions look, as if it already de-soldered itself.. getting too hot.

The big size of this component is also critical, as it will destroy the solder junction simply by temperature changes (mismatch PCB vs. resistor ceramics).

All these glass diodes are also no preferred automotive components, due to reliability issues.

This big axial electrolytic caps is no-name.. also bad..
The SMD UHF type maybe from Nichicon, that would be ok.


On the bottom, the crystal quartz is absolutely not suited to automotive vibration requirements. (1G .. 5G)
If this is a powertrain electronics, not at all.

The legs of this construction are sharply bent and will be torn very soon.


Even if this electronic is sold as an aftermarket product, it should anyhow fulfill basic automotive requirements.

If this is intended  for a 4W drive function,  it's even dangerous.

Frank
 


« Last Edit: August 21, 2015, 05:29:49 pm by Dr. Frank »
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8517
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2015, 07:46:04 pm »
There is even silkscreen on top of silkscreen  :palm:

These people should be for idden to touch or make anything elctronic ever again...
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9504
  • Country: gb
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2015, 08:16:03 pm »
Nobody noticed that the large axial Electrolytic doesn't seem to be tied down in any way and its mounting holes are virtually empty of solder???
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline rvalente

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 726
  • Country: br
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2015, 10:16:24 pm »
hahah makes me laugh of the time I was at continental automotive and visteon...
 

Offline AF6LJ

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2902
  • Country: us
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2015, 10:26:49 pm »
You can tell for sure the soldering on the back side was done without tinning the hot brick first.
Sue AF6LJ
 

Offline NiHaoMike

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9016
  • Country: us
  • "Don't turn it on - Take it apart!"
    • Facebook Page
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #13 on: August 22, 2015, 02:27:58 am »
DAT USB routing  :o
I guess it is short and kinda works. They should have gone for 4 layers if they cannot be bothered with this boring so called hand routing everyone else does.
It also helps that USB 1.1 is very tolerant of bad wiring. Even USB 2.0 isn't particularly hard to make work, but USB 3.0/3.1 is very picky.
Cryptocurrency has taught me to love math and at the same time be baffled by it.

Cryptocurrency lesson 0: Altcoins and Bitcoin are not the same thing.
 

Offline firewalker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2450
  • Country: gr
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #14 on: August 22, 2015, 05:44:21 am »
ECUs for converting gasoline car to natural gas are also the same quality like the one above. At least the one I have taken apart.

Alexander.
Become a realist, stay a dreamer.

 

Offline rvalente

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 726
  • Country: br
Re: Automotive Control Unit Teardown
« Reply #15 on: August 22, 2015, 01:36:04 pm »
Yehp, I'd could say 9 of 10 aftermarket electronics in a car are poorly designed, this includes: Car alarms/anti theft systems, natural gas and ethanol converters, car audio amplifiers, HID lamps ("xenon" lamps") and many other ECUs....  and why?

Well, there is not much regulations for aftermarket. In the other hand the OEM (Bosch, Magneti Marelli, Delphi, Sagem...) have such a high standard because they and the car companies want to avoid at any possible way recalls process (they can get amazingly expensive).

Even though I can share, while I was at continental we developed car radio, toke us 9 revisions of board to get to a decent product. Absolutely stupid... why? Was the team crap? Nope, actually all guy had 10+ years of experience but the project manager was a stupid mind and we had almost no T&M equipment in the lab.

What I'm trying to say is, maybe the electronics engineer of this board is a good professional, but his PM cut all costs possibles: AEC Q100 qualified parts, good assembly, other brandy components and hired a bad layout company .
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf