Author Topic: Cheap smoke absorber  (Read 19682 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pigrew

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 680
  • Country: us
Re: Cheap smoke absorber
« Reply #50 on: August 10, 2017, 06:11:45 pm »
I just purchased a 493-clone smoke absorber. The parts looks nearly identical to the actual Hakko model, though I have a few issues with it:

  • Strain relief is a zip-tie that isn't tightened enough.
  • Sharp wood-screws used to hold the fan in place are placed with their threads touching wires.
  • The neutral wire was switched, not the hot wire. (Not that it really matters since there is no exposed metal).
  • Why did they use a three-prong power-plug? The ground-wire is floating. An unpolarized two-prong plug would be nicer, and they could have used two thicker wires instead of the three 0.5mm^2 wires they used (for the same price).
  • The fan is Sumom. Why do they have to call it something so similar to a name brand? Upsetting. Does CE mean chinese-export? Somehow I can't believe that it's actually meets CE standard. Since it's sold in the USA, I'd expect it have the UR mark, too.
  • There are no marking on the exterior of the unit to state its required voltage or current, or that it's UL certified.
  • I doubt it's actually ESD-dissipative plastic, but I don't know how to verify that.
  • The power cord is a little bit short, especially after redoing the strain relief.
  • The labels on the unit's top are just stickers. I really don't understand why the put the on/off stickers on the unit, as it'd look more professional without them.

Do I regret buying it? Somewhat, it seems to be false advertising, and unsafe as sold. The major remaining issue is if the plastic is ESD-safe. But, for $22 after shipping, I can't complain too much.

I've redone the strain-relief and made the unit a bit safer, as shown in the attached photos. I'd suggest that others do the same.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf