Has anyone had any luck with non-Engineer(PA-09,PA-20,orPA-21) "dupont-ish" crimpers?
Everyone who's used the "Engineer" crimpers seem to say:
1) they are the best ever, and,
2) everything else is junk.
Alas, I am frugal - Engineer is $40usd; thus, we have a problem.
Crimping is a **metal-forming** operation. Repeat: metal-forming - the metal is formed; this involves forming of the metal. In my limited metal-forming experience:
1) tool must have proper shape & contour;
2) tool surface must be super-smooth, so metal can easily slide over the tool
3) tool must be lubricated, for the same reason.
In sleemanj's picture above, the SN-28B tool contour looks pretty good - it has the proper "butt cracks" needed to form the metal. And the jaws seem to align&interlock OK. So I'm wondering: why it is crap?
I've seen jaw pictures of other ebay $12 ratchet crimpers, and yes, there is a wide variety - many do not have the required buttcracks. And the ratcheting tools seem to all be the "crimp insulation and copper both at the same time" variety (unlike the Engineer tool, which requires you to crimp the copper wire, then crimp around the wire's insulation) - they have dual-stage "stepped" jaws, which IMO exponentially increases the machining precision required.... and the manufacturers of $12 ratchet tools are usually not known for precision machining... and junk results.
But sleemanj's SN-28B *looks* pretty good... so what's the problem?
If anyone has crap ratchet crimpers that *look* good, but crimp poorly, I'd like to know:
1) is the tool surface rough? you may need a microscope to find out. Does fine-sanding help?
2) does lubrication help? A dab of grease or spot of olive oil can make **huge** difference, when placed right where the metal sliding occurs (near the, umm, buttcrack). Grab your tool and try some lube!