Advantage of ersa i-tool in not just in spec. It's a much smaller tool size and much lower tip-to grip distance, especially compared to 888D, ergonomics, UI. Also construction of heater and tips make it perform as if those were cartridge tips. Hakko clone vs i-tool. Don't be fooled by it's size, it has 150W heating power.
It's a much smaller tool size and much lower tip-to grip distance,
One potential drawback of this is reach. Certain tips have to be held at a specific angle for specific operations. I have found, for instance, that with T12 iron, I can not get the same amount of reach when drag soldering an IC, using the equivalent tip type. Holding the iron farther back is perfectly comfortable for me, and the T12 handle is slightly longer, even. But the angle of the tip is slightly different. Even though the mechanical drawing of the tips show they are supposedly the same bevel angle, the T12 tip is in fact slightly blunter, which I suppose is necessary if you want to use the tip when choked up at the shortest possible tip-grip distance. Probably many on the forums do prototyping and repair more than anything else. So I grant this is a minor quibble for most and concede in general, the shorter the tip to grip, the better, for most. Me, I want the iron and tips to be designed for the the reach I'm comfortable with, and the 888 is just about perfect. Any shorter is just short-changing me. Esp if you solder under a microscope, it makes a difference. With the 888 I have normal grip, which is slightly shorter than my max reach. And I can extend that out a bit when needed. With the 951 style grip, I find I usually hold it back at about the same distance, anyway, at least as far back as I can still grip the foam part of the grip. Varying grip too much ends up wasting time finding the tip under the microscope. That said, Ersa looks more ergonomic to me than the 951.
ergonomics,
ergonomics are subjective, to some degree. Also, clone handle is not the same ergos as an 888, IMO. The thin rubber overgrip is really not good.
construction of heater and tips make it perform as if those were cartridge tips
Yes, indeed. Ersa response/warm-up is great. I don't think you need to compare it to cartridge tips. There are some "theoretical" advantages of cartridge tips which don't seem to be that big a deal when you look at what Ersa can do. (I don't personally realize any advantage of T12 clone over 888, either, though, lol; this is just the reality of what kind of soldering I do to this point in my life).
it has 150W heating power
I'm sure this is useful if you're using it. But if you don't have specific need, the bigger number isn't helping you solder.
One big quirk for me is the retaining screw nut thing. It looks like it makes changing tips a pain, and this part eventually destroys itself. Or you buy one of these for every tip, adding another 5.00 and making organizing and selecting the right tip a big PITA due to this extra bulk on each tip. This is why I wondered, why don't Ersa user just ream out this part so it doesn't stick on the tip so tight.
But mostly, I think having and using the right tip is priority 1. I'll use multiple stations if I need to, to use the right tip for the job.