I have worked with stereo magnifier as both hobbyist and geology. I have experienced all types in academia and self owned ones. There are many inexpensive microscopes being made in China and India. I have three stereo microscopes in my sleeping room along with my Philips analog and Rigol digital. Stereo microscopes comes in two types. Greenough design with the microscope for each eye provides great relief 3 dimensional views, but lower N.A., numerical aperture, angular resolution. Common objective provides the greatest resolution, higher N.A. and narrow, but higher angular resolution. That is why semiconductors are inspected with reflected light microscopes with single compound objectives with really high N.A. and sharp images. The working distance is long a few millimeters and the depth of field is little. The resolution and sharp images are for the really flat and shiny objects. I have the plastic Zeiss DR1040, slightly blurry images compared with the compound microscopes, because of low N.A. and larger separation distance between the two objectives, a Greenough design. I have used that to inspect my soldering in powered amplifier, when I repaired my Sony stereo. Greenough design have great working distance, around 3 inches, 80 mm and good depth of field. My Zeiss DR1040 has only two magnifications in steps, 10X and 40X. My cheap, Meiji Techno SKT-2 is a portable Greenough stereo microscope with only 10X and 30X. My best stereo microscope is an expensive Nikon SMZ-U, 7.5 X to 75X stepless, common objective design with better N.A. by an adjustable f/stop like in a camera, but two optical path from a single objective system. I used them to study rocks and minerals with their ground mass and euhedral (distinct crystals) and anhedral (crystals mixed into the ground mass of the rock). I can pick out the individual minerals in beach sand. It is true that we could use it to identify parts and labels in electronics.
The working distance, depth of field, brightness of the image, and sharpness decrease with increasing magnification. LED lights are sometimes too cold white temperature. Any goose neck flexible desk lamp will work, too.
The most expensive brand of microscope you could buy is the Wild Heerbrugg line that was made in Switzerland. There are some models of the Olympus and Nikon that are expensive, like the 1:10 zoom common objective design microscopes are expensive. The current model Zeiss V-8 series are expensive, too, a common objective design. Yours is a Greenough design like my inexpensive Meiji Techno or Zeiss DR1040. Wild Heerbrugg in plastic body is the Leica M and MS series. Leica Microsystem got bought out by Wild Heerbrugg. American makes are the Bausch and Lomb Stereo Zoom series in a pod and offered second hand at fixed single magnification for $250.00 at 10X from Nightingale Sales in Florida, U.S.A. There are no spare parts for the Bausch and Lomb models, too old and the supporting company is not interested.
I am not familar with the Mantis, but the only advantage is it is ocular less, fiber optic microchannel projection screen view, which is handy when soldering surface mounted components. This is what a geology person would buy. Mantis is made by a company in the U.K., Vision Engineering:
I cannot afford this 8X, three dimensional magnifier for $1,872.00 USD. Surf here:
http://www.all-spec.com/products/MCHBS.htmlI have heard about these awhile ago, but it is not something we used for mineral identification. I just use my geology microscope for checking soldering, because it is available in my room and already paid for many years ago. I have seen pictures of the Mantis in magazines, but never tired one myself, ocularless, comfortable while soldering and viewing through it simultaneously. Dave Jones is right about the possibilities at 8X.
http://www.visioneng.com/stereo-inspection-microscopes-overview.phpThe Queen of Elizabeth of England got to tour Vision Engineering office and factory. The Queen got to view through a Mantis.
http://www.visioneng.com/company-profile.phpLawsen