Author Topic: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?  (Read 2157 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
I've asked same question -> HERE, but no answer yet, so I think maybe I will get it here.

It's about getting an attenuator for my spectrum analyzer to prevent overloading the input.

My SA input range is 9KHz-3GHz, should I buy the one say capable of DC-3GHz, or the higher the better say like DC-10GHz or even DC-20GHz ? Or any other comments or suggestions ?

Thanks in advance.

Offline Neganur

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1138
  • Country: fi
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2018, 11:21:12 am »
Worst thing to happen is that it's not attenuating "well" beyond its rated bandwidth.

That could mean that if the signal you're sending though it has a strong 2nd or 3rd harmonic and some parts of the signal chain somehow manage to have mixing products that fall into the DC-3GHz range of your SA, then you may see some spur.

I don't think this will be significant enough to worry about it, the power of the harmonics will be less than the fundamental in any case.
 
The following users thanked this post: BravoV

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2018, 11:41:34 am »
Neganur, thanks for replying !  :-+

Worst thing to happen is that it's not attenuating "well" beyond its rated bandwidth.

That could mean that if the signal you're sending though it has a strong 2nd or 3rd harmonic and some parts of the signal chain somehow manage to have mixing products that fall into the DC-3GHz range of your SA, then you may see some spur.

Noted, especially on the possible spurious signal beyond my SA's range.

Which is pointless right ? CMIIW


I don't think this will be significant enough to worry about it, the power of the harmonics will be less than the fundamental in any case.

Actually I'm planning to use it with my old time mark generator, as a comb generator as it generates really narrow sharp pulse, in order to see it's harmonics and it's linearity at my SA as its used one, will this matter ?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2018, 11:52:52 am by BravoV »
 

Offline Karlo_Moharic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 100
  • Country: hr
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2018, 06:19:15 pm »
Just use the one that matches your SA bandwith and that's it
 

Offline TheSteve

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3753
  • Country: ca
  • Living the Dream
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2018, 07:32:24 pm »
What are the chances you'll eventually get another analyzer with a higher top frequency? It would be nice to keep using the same attenuators.
VE7FM
 

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2018, 07:58:45 am »
What are the chances you'll eventually get another analyzer with a higher top frequency? It would be nice to keep using the same attenuators.

Pretty slim chance. Guess I will stick to 3GHz or at least near it, thanks.

Offline eb4fbz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 178
  • Country: es
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2018, 11:06:54 am »
The bigger the better. Attenuators bandwidth is usually specified by their return loss bandwidth instead of the att flatness. Attenuation flatness is better on precission attenuators, and ir ripples when the RL is degraded.
 

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2018, 04:18:05 pm »
Still in context of protecting SA input, how about the DC Block adapter low range ? As most I've noted starting from 10 MHz.

Offline Neganur

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1138
  • Country: fi
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2018, 05:17:30 pm »
That means that the block you're looking at does not have any significant insertion loss after 10 MHz.
It's a cap after all, think of how large a cap must be to not pose much resistance (reactance) at 9 kHz

You probably have blocking caps in circuits at below 10 MHz anyway, or what is it that you want to measure?
 

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2018, 07:05:52 am »
That means that the block you're looking at does not have any significant insertion loss after 10 MHz.
It's a cap after all, think of how large a cap must be to not pose much resistance (reactance) at 9 kHz

You probably have blocking caps in circuits at below 10 MHz anyway, or what is it that you want to measure?

Yeah, what strange is I just purchased an used one that is 9KHz-8GHz, a Rosenberger brand, weird isn't it ?  :-//
Its still on it's way here, and attached photo from the seller.

Edit :
Some spec on this DC Block from Rosenberger

Return loss
>= 25 dB, 9 KHz to 1 GHz
>= 18 dB, 1 GHz to 4 GHz
>= 15 dB, 4 GHz to 8 GHz

Insertion loss
<= 1.10 dB, 9 KHz to 8 GHz

Is this decent ?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 10:23:28 am by BravoV »
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28335
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2018, 07:29:42 am »

Yeah, what strange is I just purchased an used one that is 9KHz-8GHz, a Rosenberger brand, weird isn't it ?  :-//
Its still on it's way here, and attached photo from the seller.
Brave Bravo, first steps into the RF rabbit hole.  :clap:

Brave bunny Bravo or Bravo brave bunny.......................never mind.  :)
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2018, 08:25:33 am »
LOL .. stop provoking me  :-DD , as I'm already deeply infected by TEA.   :-\

As the SA without a TG, pretty sure you already can guess what is next subsequently ...  :palm:

Still, feeling noob and much to learn.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 08:29:37 am by BravoV »
 

Online BravoVTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7547
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: [ASK] Attenuator bandwidth range, does bigger always better ?
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2018, 04:32:50 am »
Does Midwest Microwave brand fixed attenuator considered a good one ?


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf